Alexander Dreyer wrote:
> Dear Dave,
>> From
>> http://developers.sun.com/solaris/articles/cmp_stlport_libCstd.html
>> I read, that one might have to build with -library=stlport4 .
>>
>> I'll try it out.
> Ok, that was the right direction. I did some experiments with standalone
> PolyBoRi, I had t
I'm not sure if it's in the public release, but he looked at it today
and saw that it wasn't getShift but rather what was done with
getShift. Namely kappamax isn't initialized correctly. I saw an
update of the code but I don't know if it's public or private as of
yet.
Anyway it's a simple fix, t
Alexander Dreyer wrote:
> Dear Dave,
>> From
>> http://developers.sun.com/solaris/articles/cmp_stlport_libCstd.html
>> I read, that one might have to build with -library=stlport4 .
>>
>> I'll try it out.
> Ok, that was the right direction. I did some experiments with standalone
> PolyBoRi, I had t
On Dec 4, 3:42 pm, Dan Drake wrote:
>
> On Ubuntu 9.10 amd64, I don't get any of those doctest errors except the
> graph_generators.py one. Is there a trac ticket for that? It looks like
> there's supposed to be a .sobj file somewhere that probably didn't get
> included.
It looks like the sobj fi
Hi Burcin,
On Fri, Dec 04, 2009 at 11:42:52PM +0100, Burcin Erocal wrote:
>
> I guess all except the first one is my fault, caused by the pynac
> update at #7490. Numerical noise is expected, though I have no idea why
> we get the sign changes for complex numbers.
>
> I'll try to build things o
On Dec 4, 10:45 pm, "Dr. David Kirkby"
wrote:
> I think just making the binaries in lzma format would be unwise.
But's it's a problem if the mirror size grows too much. It already
takes days to sync! I don't see a problem in providing lzma compressed
tars only, if these archives are supported by
On Sat, 05 Dec 2009 at 08:51AM +1100, Alex Ghitza wrote:
> On my dell laptop running archlinux, i.e.
>
> [ghi...@artin ~]$ uname -a
> Linux artin 2.6.31-ARCH #1 SMP PREEMPT Tue Nov 10 19:48:17 CET 2009 i686
> Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU T9300 @ 2.50GHz GenuineIntel GNU/Linux
>
> built 4.3.alpha1
Dear Dave,
> From
> http://developers.sun.com/solaris/articles/cmp_stlport_libCstd.html
> I read, that one might have to build with -library=stlport4 .
>
> I'll try it out.
Ok, that was the right direction. I did some experiments with standalone
PolyBoRi, I had to change the code at some places (
On Fri, Dec 04, 2009 at 09:28:11AM -0800, Nick Alexander wrote:
>
> On 4-Dec-09, at 12:33 AM, Pierre wrote:
>
> >> I know you have other things to do, but do you think you could
> >> write a
> >> quick-start guide to sage-mode?
>
> Thanks for posting the basics, Pierre. Allow me to add a few
On Dec 4, 2009, at 2:27 PM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
> It would appear when creating a binary for Sage, one would normally
> put
> something like
>
> sage -bdist 4.1.2-Solaris
>
> or similar to create a binary for Solaris of version 4.1.2 of Sage.
>
> It would be relatively easy to get Sage to re
On Sat, 5 Dec 2009 09:08:43 +1100
Alex Ghitza wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 05, 2009 at 08:51:12AM +1100, Alex Ghitza wrote:
> >
> > Apart from the first one, the others look like a combination of
> > numerical noise and change of sign in the imaginary part of complex
> > numbers.
> >
>
> In fact, they
Hi Alex,
On Sat, 5 Dec 2009 08:51:12 +1100
Alex Ghitza wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 04, 2009 at 02:15:04PM +0700, Mike Hansen wrote:
> >
> > Sage 4.3.alpha1 is out. This should be pretty close to the final
> > release for 4.3. Source and binary are available at
>
> On my dell laptop running archlinux
It would appear when creating a binary for Sage, one would normally put
something like
sage -bdist 4.1.2-Solaris
or similar to create a binary for Solaris of version 4.1.2 of Sage.
It would be relatively easy to get Sage to report the version number, so one
does not have to specify that. I'd s
On Sat, Dec 05, 2009 at 08:51:12AM +1100, Alex Ghitza wrote:
>
> Apart from the first one, the others look like a combination of
> numerical noise and change of sign in the imaginary part of complex
> numbers.
>
In fact, they probably have to do with this:
--
Dan Drake wrote:
> On Thu, 03 Dec 2009 at 05:12AM -0800, Harald Schilly wrote:
>> Is the compression ratio the same?
>
> From the pbzip2 manpage:
>
>> Files that are compressed with pbzip2 are broken up into pieces and
>> each individual piece is compressed. This is how pbzip2 runs faster
>>
On Fri, Dec 04, 2009 at 02:15:04PM +0700, Mike Hansen wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> Sage 4.3.alpha1 is out. This should be pretty close to the final
> release for 4.3. Source and binary are available at
>
> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mhansen/release/4.3/alpha1/sage-4.3.alpha1.tar
> http://sa
William Stein wrote:
> 2009/12/3 Harald Schilly :
>> On Dec 3, 6:21 pm, Robert Bradshaw
>> wrote:
>>> Yep. We don't want a repeat of the .7zip fiasco ...
>> i don't know how big it was, but linux users are a bit different from
>> windows users. also for example for me on ubuntu extracting a .lzma
On Dec 4, 8:46 pm, Paul-Olivier Dehaye wrote:
> In a different direction, maybe, anyone knows of the GoogleLookup
> feature in Google Spreadsheets?
I'm not sure how useful that is, I tested it some time ago, and you
get mixed numerical and string results,...
A more interesting task would be to in
I am trying to build Sage 4.2.1 on a 32-bit 2.4 Ghz P4 running Ubuntu
9.04. The following error message is shown at completion:
--
Collecting examples for package ‘utils’
Running examples in package ‘utils’
Error: testing 'uti
Am I reading correctly that the per diem fee is 80 USD per person per
day? Those must be some serious refreshments...
Kiran
On Dec 4, 12:06 pm, kcrisman wrote:
> Just FYI:
>
> From an email forwarded to the Maxima list:
>
> *---*
>
>
OK. It seems anyway like one would have to pay per request in order to
use the API, even as an individual...
In a different direction, maybe, anyone knows of the GoogleLookup
feature in Google Spreadsheets?
See
http://beahburger.com/blog/2009/05/11/googlelookup-do-things-you-never-thought-possible
Hi,
Sage-4.2.1 and sage-4.3.alpha1 build ok on my brand new computer with Fedora 12:
new Intel i7 860 (quad core with Hyper Threading) processor, 8 Gig ram, etc.
Building ATLAS took a lot of time :(
But I have consistently problems with doctesting: mysterious failures
(segfaults):
The followin
On Dec 2, 12:12 pm, Nick Alexander wrote:
> > In the Python environment, if someone detects an error in a Python
> > function FF, then the function can be replaced in the run-time
> > environment, e.g. at a command line by:
>
> This is technically true but in practice not useful. Most Python code
>
> > Following the very short discussion on
> >http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7595, I am just asking whether the
> > function crt should be renamed to chinese_remainder_theorem ( and the crt*
> > functions too ).
>
> Please, no.
No, that wouldn't be good. On the other hand, there is
On Dec 4, 2009, at 9:17 AM, Nathann Cohen wrote:
> Hello everybody !!
>
> Following the very short discussion on
> http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7595
> , I am just asking whether the function crt should be renamed to
> chinese_remainder_theorem ( and the crt* functions too ).
>
> I
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 5:58 PM, Fredrik Johansson
wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 7:55 PM, j. arias-de-reyna wrote:
>> [...]
>>
>> I pretended to send with this message my program and a pdf file with
>> some benchmarks. But I do not know how to do it. I will send it to you
>> if you are intereste
On 4-Dec-09, at 12:33 AM, Pierre wrote:
>> I know you have other things to do, but do you think you could
>> write a
>> quick-start guide to sage-mode?
Thanks for posting the basics, Pierre. Allow me to add a few
interesting snippets.
> ** open a .sage file in emacs, and go "ctrl-c ctrl-c"
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 12:17 PM, Nathann Cohen wrote:
> Hello everybody !!
>
> Following the very short discussion on
> http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7595, I am just asking whether the
> function crt should be renamed to chinese_remainder_theorem ( and the crt*
> functions too ).
Plea
Hello everybody !!
Following the very short discussion on
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7595, I am just asking whether the
function crt should be renamed to chinese_remainder_theorem ( and the crt*
functions too ).
It was just a shy remark to begin with, as it is not my area of compet
Just FYI:
>From an email forwarded to the Maxima list:
*---*
Call for Proposals for Workshops
ISSAC 2011
June 8-11, 2011
*
I recommended Juan to post to sage-devel because there are people here
who are knowledgeable about zeta and L-function computations. The code
and results look good to me, and I would like to add it to mpmath, but
maybe some people here have comments and can provide a more in-depth
review of the alg
Hi everybody,
Any chance to get an answer to that one ? I think this is indeed a bug but I'd
rather have to point of view of the designers...
Cheers,
Florent
> When inheriting from Element, copy does not copy the dictionary:
>
> sage: from sage.structure.element import Element
> sage: cl
On Dec 4, 1:58 am, Robert Dodier wrote:
> OK, here's the input I tried:
>
> kk:1;
> ll:10;
> dz:1;
> ghomo(zl,zg):= 2/ll*sin(kk*zl)*sin(kk*(ll-zg))/(kk*sin(kk*ll)) ;
> gfourn(z,zd,n):=sin(npi*n*z/ll)*sin(npi*n*zd/ll)/((npi*n/ll)^2 -
> kk^2) ;
> uhomo(z):=integrate(ghomo(zl,z)*f1(zl),zl,0,z)+inte
William Stein wrote:
> 2009/12/3 Harald Schilly :
>> On Dec 3, 6:21 pm, Robert Bradshaw
>> wrote:
>>> Yep. We don't want a repeat of the .7zip fiasco ...
>> i don't know how big it was, but linux users are a bit different from
>> windows users. also for example for me on ubuntu extracting a .lzma
In about a week, I'll (finally!) have much much more time
to do some Sage reviews. I guess it will be too late for 4.3
by then, but I'll start to work on refereeing some of your patches
after next week if no one beats me to them.
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 3:52 AM, Nathann Cohen wrote:
> Hello every
On Dec 4, 4:52 am, William Stein wrote:
> I checked with the build farm, and lzma does *not* come by default
> with CentOS (hence RedHat); at least, there is no lzma command.
>
Thank's for checking! So I'll be careful and only trans-compress these
where the system has support!
H
--
To post to
On Dec 4, 12:26 pm, Paul-Olivier Dehaye wrote:
> Any news on this?
>
No, I sent the request from the form on the api-request webpage (same
day, so Nov 21st), explaining in general how it would be used, but no
answer so far.
H
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups
Any news on this?
On Nov 21, 6:22 pm, Harald Schilly wrote:
> On Nov 20, 5:17 am, Jason Grout wrote:
>
> > Has anyone applied for awolframalphaapi id for Sage?
>
> Not that I would know of. I'll do it right now, let's see if i get a
> response!
>
> H
--
To post to this group, send an email to
This is now:
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7602
Can you let us know if/when Damien publishes his fix?
Cheers,
Martin
--
name: Martin Albrecht
_pgp: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x8EF0DC99
_otr: 47F43D1A 5D68C36F 468BAEBA 640E8856 D7951CCF
_www: http://www.inf
Hi folks,
When upgrading from Sage 4.3.alpha0 to 4.3.alpha1, I was asked to
commit changes to the file sage-latest-online-package. I suspect this
is due to executable bits of that file being either turned on or off.
--
Regards
Minh Van Nguyen
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-dev
Hello everybody
I just read Mike's message that version 4.3 may be published soon...
Incidentally, I had begun yesterday to split the last "old" patch from the
Graph Theory section into smaller ones, so that they would be easier to
review.. I just finished it the most important, and I hope th
> I know you have other things to do, but do you think you could write a
> quick-start guide to sage-mode?
here are the very basics :
** install sage-mode as instructed, and modify your .emacs accordingly
(you didn't have any trouble there did you ?)
** go "alt-x run-sage" to start the thing.
42 matches
Mail list logo
