Burcin Erocal wrote:
> Hi Jason,
>
> On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 12:30:11 -0600
> Jason Grout wrote:
>
>> It would be nice if we could do something like:
>>
>> sage: f(x,0)=e^x
>>
>> sage: f(x,t)=x*t
>>
>>
>> or
>>
>> sage: f(0)=0
>> sage: f(x)=sin(x)/x
>>
>> Is there an elegant way to have multiple def
Hi,
Dozens of times over the years, people have complained because in Sage
symbolic variables names don't magically spring into existence, and
also about object-oriented method call notation. We have defended
this design forever, not even considering providing a non-default
optional mode what
All tests passed on both 32 and 64 bit. I can't guarantee that I can
test every build, but I'll let you know if anything breaks when I do.
On Nov 16, 12:14 pm, William Stein wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 10:11 AM, Matt Rissler wrote:
>
> > Yes, I've been building from source. And both 32-b
William Stein wrote:
>>> have to explicitly tell the build process about the fortran
>>> compiler and library location. Do this by typing
>>>
>>> export SAGE_FORTRAN=/exact/path/to/gfortran
>>> export SAGE_FORTRAN_LIB=/path/to/fortran/libs/libgfortran.so
>>
>> Okay,
>> have to explicitly tell the build process about the fortran
>> compiler and library location. Do this by typing
>>
>> export SAGE_FORTRAN=/exact/path/to/gfortran
>> export SAGE_FORTRAN_LIB=/path/to/fortran/libs/libgfortran.so
>
>
> Okay, that worked. I didn't un
William Stein wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 1:05 PM, Jason Grout
> wrote:
>> François Bissey wrote:
>>> On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 08:23:39 Jason Grout wrote:
I have a fairly fresh installation of 64-bit Ubuntu 9.10, and I'm
compiling 4.2.1. I've installed gfortran and build-essential, plus
Dan Drake wrote:
> ? Hmm, that might hard. I'm not sure how to do that. Right now, when you
> do \sage{diff(sin(x), x)}, it runs something like
>
> latex(diff(sin(x), x))
>
> and I don't know how to tell latex() to not fully evaluate the diff().
This is an oft-discussed subject (and oft-re
Hi Nicolas,
On Tue, 17 Nov 2009 at 11:32PM +0100, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
> I have a feature request: an environment where I could use the same
> syntax as in usual doctests (without the sage results):
>
> \begin{sageexample}
> sage: 1 + 1
> sage: def f(x):
> ... x^2
>
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 09:56:09AM +1100, Minh Nguyen wrote:
> This is indeed good news: another Sage workshop. On the workshop
> website, I see that reflection groups algorithms is a tentative topic.
> I didn't know you guys do reflection groups. I better get started on
> reading some literature o
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 12:37 PM, Alejandro Serrano Mena
wrote:
>> Are these -- PyQt4, QT 4.5.1, etc. -- all standard Ubuntu packages?
>> Or did you have to build them from source?
>
> QT and PyQT are standard Ubuntu packages. You need both installed to run the
> QT environment. However you also
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 11:53:27PM +0100, Florent hivert wrote:
> Just to be sure: do we agree to let this verbose list is the
> documentation of a non-trivial category to expose the tests which
> are actually run, and to systematically remove it everywhere else ?
I just made a grep, and I think s
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 1:05 PM, Jason Grout
wrote:
> François Bissey wrote:
>> On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 08:23:39 Jason Grout wrote:
>>> I have a fairly fresh installation of 64-bit Ubuntu 9.10, and I'm
>>> compiling 4.2.1. I've installed gfortran and build-essential, plus the
>>> other packages liste
Hi there,
I really like to see the following questions answered and the answer
implemented in sage. There has been already at least 5 or 6 discussion on
sage-devel about improving the doc... few of them are conclusive. I think we
should push this discussion to its end...
Though I'm far from
Hi Franco,
This is indeed good news: another Sage workshop. On the workshop
website, I see that reflection groups algorithms is a tentative topic.
I didn't know you guys do reflection groups. I better get started on
reading some literature on that topic (I can't attend the workshop,
but I heard th
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 09:35:18AM -0600, Jason Grout wrote:
>
> Rob Beezer wrote:
> > A few quick comments:
> >
> >> * I think talk=True was a bad choice of option name. It's limiting,
> >> potentially conflicts with other options, etc.
> >
> > +1 This seems to happen often; an option gets
I honestly didn't get the chance to work with it, but when I installed
sage-mode in emacs, I found it very useful, because it does this
integration of a powerful editor (also sufficiently newbie friendly)
with a sage embedded terminal
Try sage-mode and emacs!! :)
Maurizio
On 17 Nov, 17:31, Jan G
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 11:18 AM, William Stein wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 10:52 AM, Francois Maltey wrote:
>>
>> Dear all,
>>> I'm looking for success stories from people who have used Sage in
>>> their undergraduate teaching, particularly at the lower years.
>>>
>>> Also, any advice in co
Hi Dan!
I played with sagetex today. That's cool stuff :-)
I have a feature request: an environment where I could use the same
syntax as in usual doctests (without the sage results):
\begin{sageexample}
sage: 1 + 1
sage: def f(x):
... x^2
sage: f(3)
\end
On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 10:05:55 Jason Grout wrote:
>
> I haven't modified anything:
>
> /dev/shm/sage-4.2.1/local/bin% cat sage_fortran
>
> #!/bin/sh
>
> sage_fortran.bin -fPIC $...@%
>
>
>
> Of course, sage_fortran.bin is a binary executable.
>
> Checking the SAGE_FORTRAN bit:
>
> /dev/shm/s
François Bissey wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 08:23:39 Jason Grout wrote:
>> I have a fairly fresh installation of 64-bit Ubuntu 9.10, and I'm
>> compiling 4.2.1. I've installed gfortran and build-essential, plus the
>> other packages listed in step 1 of the README. I even set
>> SAGE_FORTRAN=/usr
On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 08:23:39 Jason Grout wrote:
> I have a fairly fresh installation of 64-bit Ubuntu 9.10, and I'm
> compiling 4.2.1. I've installed gfortran and build-essential, plus the
> other packages listed in step 1 of the README. I even set
> SAGE_FORTRAN=/usr/bin/gfortran before building
2009/11/17 William Stein
>
> On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 1:57 PM, Alejandro Serrano Mena
> wrote:
> > Hello again,
> >
> > 2009/11/16 William Stein
> >>
> >> On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 5:40 AM, Alejandro Serrano Mena
> >> wrote:
> >> > It usually means that you need to install libqscintilla2-dev and
> > Yeah, but occasionally enormously useful. So I think it should be
> > advertised, at least in sage -advanced, if not just so that I don't
> > ask Mike about it a third time. I'll post a patch to trac.
>
> Also, it could *easily* be fixed so that it 100% works. I just never
> got to that. So
OK, I tested it and it seems fine.
-Marshall
On Nov 17, 6:37 am, mhampton wrote:
> OK, I put one up at:
>
> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mhampton/sage-4.2.1-osx-10.5-32b...
>
> My home connection was flaky, so I had to split that into pieces and
> re-assemble it. I'll try to test it la
I have a fairly fresh installation of 64-bit Ubuntu 9.10, and I'm
compiling 4.2.1. I've installed gfortran and build-essential, plus the
other packages listed in step 1 of the README. I even set
SAGE_FORTRAN=/usr/bin/gfortran before building. I get the following
error when building R:
make
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 1:57 PM, Alejandro Serrano Mena
wrote:
> Hello again,
>
> 2009/11/16 William Stein
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 5:40 AM, Alejandro Serrano Mena
>> wrote:
>> > It usually means that you need to install libqscintilla2-dev and
>> > libqt4-dev,
>> > so development files are
On Nov 17, 8:35 am, Nathann Cohen wrote:
> And is there any known way to have eclipse use auto-completion on Sage
> classes ?
That would probably be tough within Eclipse proper although there may
be another approach...
First, I have used Eclipse successfully with Sage using PyDev and
PyDev Ex
And is there any known way to have eclipse use auto-completion on Sage
classes ?
Nathann
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.
Hi
Something in between the IDE (eclipse, spe, idle, whatever)
and the text editor (YaY vim!) that is very newbie friendly is gedit
with an embedded terminal (which we use to teach) with ipython
(or sage) in the embedded terminal. It is the standard gnome
terminal, and needs gedit-plugins to be i
Hi,
I used to use this IDE for Sage development, long ago:
http://eric-ide.python-projects.org/eric4-screenshots.html
I know that Glenn Tarbox's uses Sage from Eclipse.
Now I use a mix of emacs, vim and the notebook, depending on what I'm doing.
-- William
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 4:00 AM
Nathann Cohen wrote:
>> What sort of features are you looking for? Eclipse has a PyDev plugin
>> which can be used to write Python code.
>
> I have been told ( on #sage-devel ) that it was not possible to use
> Sage through Eclipse as we are shipping our own version of Python,
> which prevented
Hi,
The official Clay Math Institute website and schedule are up for Sage Days 18:
http://www.claymath.org/workshops/sage/
-- William
--
William Stein
Associate Professor of Mathematics
University of Washington
http://wstein.org
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To p
On 17 lis, 13:00, Mike Hansen wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 4:32 PM, Nathann Cohen
> wrote:
> > I am using Emacs ( and I am interested in knowing which softwares you
> > are using ), but so far I mainly failed to convince people this was
> > also the best option for them.
>
> I
On Nov 17, 1:33 pm, Nathann Cohen wrote:
> I have been told ( on #sage-devel ) that it was not possible to use
> Sage through Eclipse as we are shipping our own version of Python.
If you start eclipse from inside the sage environment it should work.
I remember doing something similar with netbea
Dear category fans,
Latest status report for the category patches:
- They apply smoothly on 4.2.1 with all test passing :-)
(This is on a macbook pro ubuntu 9.4 with everything up to
sage-4.3.patch in the Sage-Combinat queue)
Remains to do:
- Final comments on Groupoid (Robert)
OK, I put one up at:
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mhampton/sage-4.2.1-osx-10.5-32bit-i386-Darwin.dmg
My home connection was flaky, so I had to split that into pieces and
re-assemble it. I'll try to test it later today, or perhaps someone
else can before its put on the download page.
-M
> What sort of features are you looking for? Eclipse has a PyDev plugin
> which can be used to write Python code.
I have been told ( on #sage-devel ) that it was not possible to use
Sage through Eclipse as we are shipping our own version of Python,
which prevented the two from working together.
Hello,
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 4:32 PM, Nathann Cohen wrote:
> I am using Emacs ( and I am interested in knowing which softwares you
> are using ), but so far I mainly failed to convince people this was
> also the best option for them.
I use Emacs for everything.
> Most of the people I talked
My impression is that the notebook is best for demonstrations,
exploration and rapid development. When I need to turn the results of
a worksheet into a module, I use emacs and/or the sage shell to
aggregate the code developed in a worksheet and test it.
I'd look at the features of Eclipse you'd w
Hi Florent,
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 09:05:23AM +0100, Florent hivert wrote:
> > > I just spent/lost one hour on the following missfeature (at least in my
> > > opinion) of TestsSuite... Mind the "..." ;-) Those dots are particularly
> > > heavy
> > > dots... Still don't get it ?
> > >
>
How can you edit a plot in real time programatically? I have found
Ptplot useful in the past. It allows points to be added to a plot,
zooming, etc. Is there functionality like this in Sage? Would Ptplot
make a good addition to Sage? I would like some way to graph
quantities as they are changi
Hi !
With the forthcoming bunch of sage-combinat patches, to test a parent we call
sage: TestSuite(P).run()
which by default returns nothing if everything is ok and raise an
AssertionError
if not. There is also a verbose mode
sage: TestSuite(P).run(verbose=True)
42 matches
Mail list logo
