On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 10:36 PM, Minh Nguyen wrote:
>
> On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 1:57 PM, Tim Lahey wrote:
>
>
>
> > Oh, the OS X Readme should really be updated (and the 64-bit build
> > instructions added).
>
> On OS X 10.5.8 with GCC 4.0.1, I ran the following commands
>
> $ SAGE64=yes
> $ ex
I've seen various spkg-install files where there is something like:
if [ `uname` = "Darwin" -a "$SAGE64" = "yes" ]; then
echo "Building 64 bit OSX version of Sage"
CFLAGS="-O2 -g -m64 " && export CFLAGS
LDFLAGS="-m64"
fi
I've yet to find any linker for which -m64 is a flag. Neither t
On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 1:57 PM, Tim Lahey wrote:
> Oh, the OS X Readme should really be updated (and the 64-bit build
> instructions added).
On OS X 10.5.8 with GCC 4.0.1, I ran the following commands
$ SAGE64=yes
$ export SAGE64
$ make
prior to building these versions of Sage: 4.0, 4.0.1,
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 8:57 PM, Tim Lahey wrote:
>
>
> On Aug 29, 2009, at 11:49 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>
> >
> > How would this work on Mac? It'd be awesome to just use gfortran
> > everywhere, because petsc4py doesn't install with g95, and it would
> > save me some hours if I don't have to d
On Aug 29, 2009, at 11:49 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>
> How would this work on Mac? It'd be awesome to just use gfortran
> everywhere, because petsc4py doesn't install with g95, and it would
> save me some hours if I don't have to debug g95 no more.
>
> Ondrej
>
It's my understanding that the 64
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 12:00 PM, William Stein wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 11:17 AM, Chris Swierczewski
> wrote:
>>
>> sage-devel and Randy, (cc. Kyle Mandli)
>>
>> > Chris is working on a Sage spkg interface so that it can be easily
>> > installed as an optional package.
>>
>> This rai
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 4:13 PM, Dr. David Kirkby
wrote:
>
> The readline spkg-install script is a bit broken, as it has
>
> if [ `grep 11.1 /etc/SuSE-release > /dev/null; echo $?` == 0 ]; then
> ...
>
>
> Surely the most sensible thing would have been to check for the
> existence of /etc/SuSE-rel
The readline spkg-install script is a bit broken, as it has
if [ `grep 11.1 /etc/SuSE-release > /dev/null; echo $?` == 0 ]; then
...
Surely the most sensible thing would have been to check for the
existence of /etc/SuSE-release before trying to run grep on it. It
generates a warning on Solari
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 12:25 PM, Jason Grout
wrote:
>
> William Stein wrote:
>
> > Now for a development question: should I include automatic svn/hg/git
> > checkout and compilation of the above packages (those that aren't
> > already in Sage) in Clawpack's spkg-install script? Is tha
William Stein wrote:
> Now for a development question: should I include automatic svn/hg/git
> checkout and compilation of the above packages (those that aren't
> already in Sage) in Clawpack's spkg-install script? Is that the
> standard procedure for optional spkgs? I can of cour
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 11:17 AM, Chris Swierczewski wrote:
>
> sage-devel and Randy, (cc. Kyle Mandli)
>
> > Chris is working on a Sage spkg interface so that it can be easily
> > installed as an optional package.
>
> This raises another licensing-related issue: Clawpack requires the
> following
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 11:14 AM, Maurizio wrote:
>
>
> On 29 Ago, 19:21, William Stein wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 4:30 AM, Maurizio >wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > > Hi!
> > > I have a question.
> > > Would you please consider adding a feature in the notebook, if you
> > > happen to work on thi
sage-devel and Randy, (cc. Kyle Mandli)
> Chris is working on a Sage spkg interface so that it can be easily
> installed as an optional package.
This raises another licensing-related issue: Clawpack requires the
following libraries and Python packages (these requirements are,
unfortunately, not
On 29 Ago, 19:21, William Stein wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 4:30 AM, Maurizio wrote:
>
>
>
> > Hi!
> > I have a question.
> > Would you please consider adding a feature in the notebook, if you
> > happen to work on this?
>
> > My desire would be to have the chance to choose a slightly diffe
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 10:25:54AM -0700, William Stein wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 10:20 AM, Willem Jan Palenstijn
> wrote:
> > Ok, done. This is now http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6843 .
>
>
> Awesome. Could you post an example broken worksheet to the ticket (or link
> to one)
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 10:20 AM, Willem Jan Palenstijn wrote:
>
> On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 10:15:46AM -0700, William Stein wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 6:04 AM, Willem Jan Palenstijn >wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > We're in the process of setting up a notebook server for use by our
> > > stud
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 10:15:46AM -0700, William Stein wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 6:04 AM, Willem Jan Palenstijn
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > We're in the process of setting up a notebook server for use by our
> > students, and ran into a (minor) issue.
> >
> > We are uploading an old sage wor
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 4:30 AM, Maurizio wrote:
>
> Hi!
> I have a question.
> Would you please consider adding a feature in the notebook, if you
> happen to work on this?
>
> My desire would be to have the chance to choose a slightly different
> type of worksheet: a "single cell"-like mode, that
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 6:04 AM, Willem Jan Palenstijn wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> We're in the process of setting up a notebook server for use by our
> students,
> and ran into a (minor) issue.
>
> We are uploading an old sage worksheet .sws file that someone prepared some
> time ago to the notebook. When
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 10:10 AM, Jason Grout
wrote:
>
> Fredrik Johansson wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > How about supporting n! as a shortcut for factorial(n)? This syntax is
> > very convenient and makes a huge difference for combinatorial
> > expressions with many factorials. M&M (Maple & Mathematica)
Fredrik Johansson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> How about supporting n! as a shortcut for factorial(n)? This syntax is
> very convenient and makes a huge difference for combinatorial
> expressions with many factorials. M&M (Maple & Mathematica) allow this
> notation, as do many scientific calculators.
>
> Al
2009/8/29 Fredrik Johansson :
>
> Hi,
>
> How about supporting n! as a shortcut for factorial(n)? This syntax is
> very convenient and makes a huge difference for combinatorial
> expressions with many factorials. M&M (Maple & Mathematica) allow this
> notation, as do many scientific calculators.
>
William Stein wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 10:25 AM,
> Juanjo wrote:
>> On Aug 28, 3:01 pm, "Dr. David Kirkby"
>> wrote:
>>> Using the first release of Solaris 10 should iron out any other
>>> portability issues, since perhaps our build process makes some
>>> assumptions about Solaris 10 whic
Hi,
How about supporting n! as a shortcut for factorial(n)? This syntax is
very convenient and makes a huge difference for combinatorial
expressions with many factorials. M&M (Maple & Mathematica) allow this
notation, as do many scientific calculators.
Although Python doesn't have any other post
You could use the multivariate power series in Maxima.
There are 2 versions, maximum total degree and (recursively)
maximum individual variable degree.
As for design, if you were writing it from scratch, I think the
Maple system has a somewhat more flexible implementation.
I think Axiom may have
Thanks for the feedback, and apologies for not replying earlier. I
have posted an updated draft on
http://www.gingerlime.com/20090829__sage_msc_proj_draft.pdf
Please see sections 4.1 and 5.4.4 where I documented the sagenb.org
setup more clearly. I mentioned it is already using virtualisation an
Hi William,
Thanks for the clarification. To start the discussion, let me ask if
there is a good place for learning about how Sage deals with
generators, the syntax X., and what classes to inherit to get this
functionality working in a class?
-Jon
=)
On Aug 29, 2:16 am, William Stein wrote
27 matches
Mail list logo
