Hi William,
I built gcc 4.4.0 myself, and used it:
[r...@sagenb ~]# gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
Target: i686-pc-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../gcc-4.4.0/configure --prefix=/usr/local --with-
bugurl=http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla --enable-bootstrap --with-
gmp=/usr/local --with-mpfr=/usr/loc
Great, glad to see this! Thanks for the updated spkg.
On Jul 26, 9:47 pm, Marshall Hampton wrote:
> Ok, I posted my spkg at:
>
> http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6634
>
> It would be great if you (tkeller) got a trac account, since currently
> I don't know any other sage developers who
Ok, I posted my spkg at:
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6634
It would be great if you (tkeller) got a trac account, since currently
I don't know any other sage developers who have any real interest in
this (partial exception of William Stein but clearly he has a lot on
his plate).
-M
Hi Golam,
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 12:01 PM, Golam Mortuza
Hossain wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> While doing some symbolic computations that require
> Maxima interface, "timeit" reports progressively
> longer duration for the same computation.
>
> -
> sage: f(x) = function('f',x);
> sage: timeit('boo
2009/7/26 William Stein :
>
> Hi Sage-Devel (in particular, people who know about electrical circuits),
>
> I just happen to be meeting with an undergrad tomorrow at Univ. of
> Washington about him possibly working with me, and he mentioned that
> he wrote the following himself
>
Hi,
While doing some symbolic computations that require
Maxima interface, "timeit" reports progressively
longer duration for the same computation.
-
sage: f(x) = function('f',x);
sage: timeit('bool( f(x) == 0 )')
5 loops, best of 3: 71.6 ms per loop
sage: timeit('bool( f(x) == 0 )')
5 lo
that is wonderful!!
by the way, I am looking forward to see those LTI and Fourier
Transform features applied to our powerful symbolic system :D
Maurizio
On Jul 26, 9:23 pm, Rafael Cardoso Dias Costa
wrote:
> The problem is solved!
>
> http://www.sagenb.org/home/pub/677/
>
> Thanks, Jason!
> Th
Wow, my field! :)
I would like to add that SAGE can open a new door to circuit analysis,
thanks to its symbolic manipulation.
A friend of mine adopted the techniques to solve the circuits defined
by a netlist like in SPICE. If you adopt that same technique in SAGE,
you are allowed to define one
Hello,
http://www.circuitengine.com is my site. It uses Gaussian elimination
and a fifth order adaptive step-size Runga-Kutta solver to simulate
electric circuits that are drawn by the user. I created a login for
the sage development team to use. Please feel free to experiment with
my program.
This seems interesting.
I teach circuits and networks every semester as an application of
ODEs/systems of ODEs. The EMF is not necessarily constant
and occasionally we might have a variable term (eg, a variable capacitor).
Questions:
1. Does his program allow non-constant terms and symbolic term
The problem is solved!
http://www.sagenb.org/home/pub/677/
Thanks, Jason!
Thanks, everyone!
On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 10:40 PM, Jason Grout
wrote:
>
> Rafael Costa wrote:
> > Why Sage not execute the python code?
> >
> > from scipy import *
> > from pylab import *
> >
> > sample_rate=1000.00
> >
Hi Sage-Devel (in particular, people who know about electrical circuits),
I just happen to be meeting with an undergrad tomorrow at Univ. of
Washington about him possibly working with me, and he mentioned that
he wrote the following himself
http://www.circuitengine.c
Hi,
Thanks for pointing that out. I have made a 1.51b spkg, but decided
to wait a week or two for the final 1.51 to come out. But I didn't
realize that the 1.49b install was broken.
Anyway if you have any interest in helping out, you should get a trac
account. Just email William Stein for one
Thanks for all the recent work upgrading the base python distribution
to 2.6, I imagine it was quite a task. I noticed that installing the
biopython-1.49b spkg is broken from the upgrade . I have upgraded the
spkg to 1.51b and it installs and works fine on my sage-4.1
installation. Is there a plac
>
> I gave a plenary talk at a big MAA meeting a few months ago. It was
> entirely a live demo using the Sage notebook. It went perfectly.
> Stan Wagon gave another talk in using the Mathematica notebook, and it
> surprisingly had numerous bugs/problems as a result of bugs in
> Mathematica's no
I thought I had reviewed that ticket, but apparently I have tried it
out but not yet reported.
As wjp says on the ticket, to try it out you only need to install the
new spkg and the second patch. But to adopt this spkg as part of Sage
proper would need a vote here. I suggest that wjp helps that
16 matches
Mail list logo
