On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 10:30 PM, Alex Clemesha wrote:
>
> Hi Ondrej,
>
> I'll reply from a purely codenode point of view. You sent this
> email to both lists, but I'm only qualified to describe the details
> of codenode's current architecture.
Yes. In fact, one reason I wrote it is so that you
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 10:21 PM, William Stein wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 9:02 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I finally learned javascript and AJAX, so that I can help with the
>> notebook. I also studied it's sources.
>>
>> First things I like:
>>
>> * I like the user interface, i
Hi Ondrej,
very nice work!
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 9:02 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
> a) the keyboard handling is horrific, why not to use some standard
> library for that, that works across all browsers
> b) it uses some custom format for transfering data (which has bugs,
> like
> http://groups
Hi Rob,
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 4:03 PM, Rob Beezer wrote:
>
> Minh Nguyen wrote:
>
>> This is the first release of the Sage 4.1.1 release cycle.
>
> I get the following error building from source on 64-bit Ubuntu 9.04
> on Intel Core Duo
>
> error: could not create 'build/temp.linux-x86_64-2.6':
On Jul 20, 9:02 pm, Ondrej Certik wrote:
[snip]
> Also, question to all, do you like the In [3] and Out[3] lines? I
> don't have an opinion on it yet myself, so I implemented them, to see
> how it looks like.
How easy would it be to add a way to toggle them on and off?
> Also, please let me k
Hi Ondrej,
I'll reply from a purely codenode point of view. You sent this
email to both lists, but I'm only qualified to describe the details
of codenode's current architecture.
> a) the keyboard handling is horrific, why not to use some standard
> library for that, that works across all brow
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 9:02 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I finally learned javascript and AJAX, so that I can help with the
> notebook. I also studied it's sources.
>
> First things I like:
>
> * I like the user interface, it's usable, especially the attention to
> little details, like bord
Hi folks,
This is the first release of the Sage 4.1.1 release cycle. William and
I are co-chairing this release cycle. The source tarball and the
sage.math only binary are available at
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mvngu/release/sage-4.1.1.alpha0.tar
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/m
Marshall and David: thanks very much for these suggestions.
Dave
On Jul 20, 4:59 am, David Joyner wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 3:33 PM, davidp wrote:
>
> > I have been working on a Sage package for doing computations involving
> > the
> > Abelian Sandpile Model. In addition, this summer I
Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
> I've officially reported this bug to Sun, as the machine on which it was
> observed is under a support contract.
>
> Hopefully they will fix the library code.
I've been given a work-around, which is to unmount the library
# umount /platform/sun4v/lib/libc_psr.so.1
wh
(Just in case Markus isn't subscribed.)
-- Forwarded message --
From: Markus Hohenwarter
Date: Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 6:24 PM
Subject: Re: [sage-devel] Re: Sage and JSXGraph
To: William Stein
Cc: sage-devel@googlegroups.com, Alfred Wassermann
, Michael Borcherds
Dear William,
William Stein wrote:
> So I vote +1 to inclusion of Frobby in Sage, modulo having the issues
> that have been discussed in this thread being sorted out (e.g.,
> Solaris support).
>
> -- William
If someone does make a package, I could test it here home to give
another data point in addition to
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 3:53 PM, casbon wrote:
>
>
> On Jul 11, 6:59 pm, William Stein wrote:
>> 2009/7/11 casbon :
>> Any chance you could try out http://sagenb.org and give similar feedback?
>> [to what you gave for codenode]
>
> This seems a lot clearer - the evaluate button works, blocks wor
I've officially reported this bug to Sun, as the machine on which it was
observed is under a support contract.
Hopefully they will fix the library code.
The following bit of code, which was a modification of a program wirten
by Gonzalo Tornaria is the simpliest I can find which shows it with b
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 1:39 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> if you execute this in the notebook:
>
> print "___S_A_G_E___"
>
> the cell will get deleted and "" will endup instead of it.
> That's a bug, but you might argue that noone should be executing this
> in the first place.
Thanks. Fi
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 2:27 PM, Robert Miller wrote:
>
>> Is the slideshow mode for the notebook in usable form with the patches
>> in trac #6342?
>
> I found a few (minor) bugs when I was working with it. I spent the
> time it takes to make a set of slides. After that I knew it well
> enough to
I was curious, so I tried to apply the patch to 4.1 but it was
rejected. It wasn't clear to me why, maybe it needs to be rebased.
-Marshall
On Jul 20, 3:27 pm, Robert Miller wrote:
> > Is the slideshow mode for the notebook in usable form with the patches
> > in trac #6342?
>
> I found a few (
> Is the slideshow mode for the notebook in usable form with the patches
> in trac #6342?
I found a few (minor) bugs when I was working with it. I spent the
time it takes to make a set of slides. After that I knew it well
enough to use it during a talk. In other words, there are issues, but
you d
Hi,
Is the slideshow mode for the notebook in usable form with the patches
in trac #6342?
I will be giving a few talks using Sage next week. After seeing the
slideshow mode in action in Barcelona, I can't belive we lived
without this for such a long time. However, I really don't have much
time a
I am trying to bring tachyon.py to 100% coverage, and I am wondering
if the TachyonPlot class is actually used for anything. It doesn't
seem to be, but I wanted to double-check.
Incidentally, I am finding that our tachyon interface is missing some
functionality, such as rings and axis-aligned bo
Hi,
if you execute this in the notebook:
print "___S_A_G_E___"
the cell will get deleted and "" will endup instead of it.
That's a bug, but you might argue that noone should be executing this
in the first place.
Ondrej
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this grou
Hi John,
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 5:50 AM, John H Palmieri wrote:
> This much I think I understand: if you change the end of the line
> before the doctest from
>
> "the following equation::"
>
> to
>
> "the following equation:
>
> ::"
>
> Then doctests fail, as you report that they should. So
On Jul 20, 12:34 pm, Minh Nguyen wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 4:18 AM, Minh Nguyen wrote:
> > Hi folks,
>
> > I'm getting the following error when working through this part of the
> > Sage tutorial
>
> >http://www.sagemath.org/doc/tutorial/tour_algebra.html#solving-equati...
>
>
>
> Here's
Hi,
On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 3:11 PM, William Stein wrote:
>>> Or should we just restore old "diff" by simply sub-classing it
>>> from SFunction like what is being done for "integration"
>>> and others?
>
> At first glance doing this sounds like a really good idea. How hard
> would it be for you
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 4:18 AM, Minh Nguyen wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I'm getting the following error when working through this part of the
> Sage tutorial
>
> http://www.sagemath.org/doc/tutorial/tour_algebra.html#solving-equations-numerically
Here's a weird thing: The example concerned is in th
On Jul 20, 2:41 pm, Jason Grout wrote:
> As I understand it, the -upgrade downloads just the spkgs it needs.
> However, if all that is available on the mirror is the complete .tar
> file (i.e., not extracted), there are no spkgs to download. You would
> have to download the .tar file in order to
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 12:20 PM, Ezra Miller wrote:
> For what it's worth, I agree with your analysis, William.
> Ezra
>
> -
> Ezra Miller
> Mathematics Department (919) 660-2846
> Duke University, Box 90320 e...@math.duke.edu
>
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 5:36 AM, Jason Grout wrote:
>
> William Stein wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 2:05 AM, Alfred
>> Wassermann wrote:
>>> Dear William,
>>> Tatsuyoshi Hamada from the Knoppix/Math project told me about
>>> your wonderful projects Sage (in fact I have heard about it before)
>
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 10:37 AM, Tim Dumol wrote:
>
> I've started a ticket on it ( http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6568
> ) and uploaded a small patch implementing the migration of a few
> functions in notebook.py to Jinja -- although not in idiomatic Jinja,
> to be done later.
Why is
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 11:22 AM, gsw wrote:
>
>
>
> On 17 Jul., 00:36, William Stein wrote:
>
>>
>> That said, I *do* think it is a good idea to considering getting
>> Frobby into standard Sage, simply because it provides much new
>> optimized functionality. That said -- I want to ask a questi
On 17 Jul., 00:36, William Stein wrote:
>
> That said, I *do* think it is a good idea to considering getting
> Frobby into standard Sage, simply because it provides much new
> optimized functionality. That said -- I want to ask a question of
> people who are voting +1 to this proposal: have
Hi folks,
I'm getting the following error when working through this part of the
Sage tutorial
http://www.sagemath.org/doc/tutorial/tour_algebra.html#solving-equations-numerically
[mv...@sage ~]$ sage
--
| Sage Version 4.1, Rel
On 20 Jul., 19:42, William Stein wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 10:33 AM, gsw wrote:
>
> > Hi,
>
> > I'm downloading these sources (the file name is "sage-4.1.comb.tar"
> > BTW, i.e. without "inat") and will build a Mac OS X 10.4 32bit Intel
> > version (I can't build 64bit versions for the t
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 10:33 AM, gsw wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm downloading these sources (the file name is "sage-4.1.comb.tar"
> BTW, i.e. without "inat") and will build a Mac OS X 10.4 32bit Intel
> version (I can't build 64bit versions for the time being), which
> should work fine on OS X 10.5 (on
I've started a ticket on it ( http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6568
) and uploaded a small patch implementing the migration of a few
functions in notebook.py to Jinja -- although not in idiomatic Jinja,
to be done later.
On Jul 20, 2:12 am, William Stein wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at
Hi,
I'm downloading these sources (the file name is "sage-4.1.comb.tar"
BTW, i.e. without "inat") and will build a Mac OS X 10.4 32bit Intel
version (I can't build 64bit versions for the time being), which
should work fine on OS X 10.5 (on a MacIntel), too. I'll post a note
with the link to the r
Hi John,
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 2:25 AM, John H Palmieri wrote:
>
> On Jul 20, 9:10 am, Minh Nguyen wrote:
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> I'm about to release Sage 4.1.1.alpha0. But before doing so, I have a
>> question about the Sage banner. As you know the banner currently
>> reads:
>>
>> ---
On Jul 20, 9:10 am, Minh Nguyen wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I'm about to release Sage 4.1.1.alpha0. But before doing so, I have a
> question about the Sage banner. As you know the banner currently
> reads:
>
> --
> | Sage Version 4.1,
Here's the ouptput on the Blade 2000 of the code Gonzalo posted.
drkir...@kestrel:[~] $ more u.s
.file "u.c"
.section".rodata"
.align 8
.LLC0:
.asciz "%d %d\n"
.section".text"
.align 4
.global main
.type main, #fun
Hi folks,
I'm about to release Sage 4.1.1.alpha0. But before doing so, I have a
question about the Sage banner. As you know the banner currently
reads:
--
| Sage Version 4.1, Release Date: 2009-07-09 |
|
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 9:07 AM, David Kirkby wrote:
>
> How to I force gcc to output the assember like this?
$ gcc -S t2.c
will create t2.s. You can compile the asm (possibly modified) with
$ gcc t2.s -o t2
etc.
Gonzalo
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this g
Marshall Hampton wrote:
> Hi Jan,
>
> I thought you could do something like:
>
> sage -upgrade ftp://ftp.sun.ac.za/pub/mirrors/www.sagemath.org/
>
> i.e. you can give an explicit URL, but that doesn't seem to work. I
> guess the tarball needs to be unpacked on that mirror for it work - ?
As I
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 12:33 AM, Jan Groenewald wrote:
>
> Hi
>
>> > I build sage from source as I believe someone told me
>> > that you can do the partial downloads of only new SPKGes
>> > with sage -upgrade, but you cannot do this if you untarred a
>> > binary. Correct?
> On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 a
Hi
> > I build sage from source as I believe someone told me
> > that you can do the partial downloads of only new SPKGes
> > with sage -upgrade, but you cannot do this if you untarred a
> > binary. Correct?
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 12:05:18AM +1000, Minh Nguyen wrote:
> If previously you used a b
Hi Jan,
I thought you could do something like:
sage -upgrade ftp://ftp.sun.ac.za/pub/mirrors/www.sagemath.org/
i.e. you can give an explicit URL, but that doesn't seem to work. I
guess the tarball needs to be unpacked on that mirror for it work - ?
-Marshall
On Jul 20, 7:56 am, Jan Groenewal
Hi Jan,
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 11:56 PM, Jan Groenewald wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> I build sage from source as I believe someone told me
> that you can do the partial downloads of only new SPKGes
> with sage -upgrade, but you cannot do this if you untarred a
> binary. Correct?
If previously you used a b
Hi
I build sage from source as I believe someone told me
that you can do the partial downloads of only new SPKGes
with sage -upgrade, but you cannot do this if you untarred a
binary. Correct?
Can I tell sage -upgrade to use a South African mirror?
Are components (SPKGes) mirrored?
regards,
Jan
On Jul 20, 8:31 am, Jason Grout wrote:
> Rob Beezer wrote:
> > William Stein wrote:
>
> > * No license fees or budget hassles.
> > * Easy setup for a central notebook server.
> > * Rapid startup time to productive student use.
>
> I don't have any marketing ideas at the moment beyond what ha
William Stein wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 2:05 AM, Alfred
> Wassermann wrote:
>> Dear William,
>> Tatsuyoshi Hamada from the Knoppix/Math project told me about
>> your wonderful projects Sage (in fact I have heard about it before)
>> and Sage notebook.
>> Do you think our project JSXGraph (ht
Rob Beezer wrote:
> William Stein wrote:
>
> * No license fees or budget hassles.
> * Easy setup for a central notebook server.
> * Rapid startup time to productive student use.
I don't have any marketing ideas at the moment beyond what has already
been mentioned. However, I do have to s
Hi David,
Thanks for the clarification. If this is the only reason, I would really
prefer a more subtle reminder. Or maybe a command that tells me the
precision of my computation when I ask for it?
Cheers
Stan
davidloeffler wrote:
>
>> Could someone point me to a reason why anything should
2009/7/20 Gonzalo Tornaria
>
> Really funny... What would you expect the following program to output?
>
> #include
> #include
>
> int main (void)
> {
> int i = 1 , j = -1;
> char c = 1, d = 1;
>
> memset(&c, 2, i + j);
> memset(&d, 2, i + j);
>
> printf("%d %d\n", c, d);
>
> return 0;
> }
On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 11:35 PM, Rob Beezer wrote:
>
> William Stein wrote:
>> Probably I've cc'd this respond to the sage-devel mailing list to see what
>> the many other sage developers think:
>
> I spent a few minutes looking at this. Most of the examples look like
> many Sage interacts - sl
On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 3:33 PM, davidp wrote:
>
> I have been working on a Sage package for doing computations involving
> the
> Abelian Sandpile Model. In addition, this summer I am the mentor for
> a Google
> Summer of Code project which is a java application for visualizing and
> analyzing sa
> Could someone point me to a reason why anything should be printed as
> 1.*var?
To remind you that the computation you're doing is only correct to 8
decimal places? If you want exact computations you shouldn't be using
the real field as base.
David
--~--~-~--~~
Dear all,
I'm not a mathematician, so I am probably asking a very naive question here:
Could someone point me to a reason why anything should be printed as
1.*var? Those factors of 1.000 that turn up in otherwise
pretty equations are among the most annoying 'features' to me. I woul
William Stein wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Sun Microsystems wants Sage to be much more well known, so they are
> throwing some of the considerable marketing resources at this problem.
>
> Ellen Fellenz from Sun asks several specific *marketing* questions
> about Sage below. If anybody here has any thoug
57 matches
Mail list logo
