2009/6/27 Dr. David Kirkby :
>
> John H Palmieri wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Jun 27, 6:50 pm, "Dr. David Kirkby"
>> wrote:
#!/usr/bin/bash
if [ `uname` = "SunOS" -a "`ld --version 2>&1 | grep GNU`" = "" ]; then
echo "Solaris system. The linker is NOT the GNU linker"
echo "The
Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
> twisted-8.2.0 is messing up on my Solaris box, but it looks odd. The
> error message is saying there's no spkg-install script,setup.py or
> configure script. But there is.
Oops, somehow I seem to have cut out the most important bit of the error
message, which is "The
twisted-8.2.0 is messing up on my Solaris box, but it looks odd. The
error message is saying there's no spkg-install script,setup.py or
configure script. But there is.
drkir...@kestrel:[~/sage/sage-4.1.alpha2/spkg/build/twisted-8.2.0] $ ls -l
total 9
-rw-r--r-- 1 drkirkby other 1466 Jun
John H Palmieri wrote:
>
>
> On Jun 27, 6:50 pm, "Dr. David Kirkby"
> wrote:
>>> #!/usr/bin/bash
>>> if [ `uname` = "SunOS" -a "`ld --version 2>&1 | grep GNU`" = "" ]; then
>>>echo "Solaris system. The linker is NOT the GNU linker"
>>>echo "The correct compiler flags are '-Wl,-h,'"
>
On Jun 27, 6:50 pm, "Dr. David Kirkby"
wrote:
> > #!/usr/bin/bash
> > if [ `uname` = "SunOS" -a "`ld --version 2>&1 | grep GNU`" = "" ]; then
> > echo "Solaris system. The linker is NOT the GNU linker"
> > echo "The correct compiler flags are '-Wl,-h,'"
> > elif [ `uname` = "darwin" ]
> #!/usr/bin/bash
> if [ `uname` = "SunOS" -a "`ld --version 2>&1 | grep GNU`" = "" ]; then
>echo "Solaris system. The linker is NOT the GNU linker"
>echo "The correct compiler flags are '-Wl,-h,'"
> elif [ `uname` = "darwin" ]; then
>echo "OS X"
>echo "Correct compiler flags
I better buy a book on python, but in the mean time, can anyone help me
here.
In 'polibori'
/polybori-0.5rc.p7/patches/SConstruct
there is this bit of code:
def sonameprefix(env):
if env['PLATFORM']=="darwin":
return "-Wl,-dylib_install_name -Wl,"
else:
return '-W
On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 1:09 AM, Bjarke Hammersholt
Roune wrote:
>
> As far as I can determine, Sage does Hilbert-series only for the
> grading given by the vector (1,...,1). I need Hilbert series with
> respect to any vector. The optional Frobby spkg I just wrote allows to
> compute this, and I'm
As far as I can determine, Sage does Hilbert-series only for the
grading given by the vector (1,...,1). I need Hilbert series with
respect to any vector. The optional Frobby spkg I just wrote allows to
compute this, and I'm trying to determine if this is the best way to
do this in Sage. Are there
On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 11:58 PM, Bjarke Hammersholt
Roune wrote:
>
> In working on the Frobby interface, I needed to use the type mpz_ptr
> that MPIR/GMP defines. This type is not defined for Cython in sage/
> libs/gmp/types.pxd, which is the file that defines mpz_t and friends.
> This is probabl
On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 12:25 AM, Bjarke Hammersholt
Roune wrote:
>
> I'm looking at sage/rings/ideal.py, and it has error messages like
>
> "need at least one argument"
> "unable to find common ring into which all ideal generators map"
> "R must be a commutative ring"
>
> The first isn't a com
> Craig: thanks for pointing out SAGE_CHECK. But it strikes me that
> there is no way I can run those tests now, without recompiling the
> corresponding spkgs from scratch. Is there any way one can get spkgs
> to provide a test script, separate from the installation procedure, so
> something like
Hi Bjarke!
On 28 Jun., 00:17, Bjarke Hammersholt Roune
wrote:
> How do I doctest Cython functions taking C data structures? I don't
> seem to be able to construct Cython data in the doctest.
Once, someone gave me the hint to create a function that takes usual
Python/Cython classes as input but
Hi David,
> I've got a build running on my laptop at the moment, and I was
> wondering: why does the install script not run the Flint test suite?
> I'm puzzled by this since it did run Flint tests when I installed
> 4.0.2, which was actually the same Flint spkg version
> (flint-1.3.0.p1.spkg)
>
David Joyner wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 3:39 PM, Pat LeSmithe wrote:
>> Fedora 10 and 11 packages for the Chromium browser and V8 JavaScript
>> engine:
>>
>> http://spot.fedorapeople.org/chromium/
>> http://spot.livejournal.com/308900.html
>
> The ubuntu debs are here:
> http://dev.chromiu
I'm looking at sage/rings/ideal.py, and it has error messages like
"need at least one argument"
"unable to find common ring into which all ideal generators map"
"R must be a commutative ring"
The first isn't a complete sentence, and the other two aren't
capitalized and don't end with a period
How do I doctest Cython functions taking C data structures? I don't
seem to be able to construct Cython data in the doctest. E.g. suppose
I have a function
cdef foo(bar baz):
...
where bar is a Cython data structure. Is there no way to doctest this,
other than doctesting other Python-level f
In working on the Frobby interface, I needed to use the type mpz_ptr
that MPIR/GMP defines. This type is not defined for Cython in sage/
libs/gmp/types.pxd, which is the file that defines mpz_t and friends.
This is probably because mpz_ptr, while convenient, is not part of the
official GMP interfa
On SuSE, 32-bit, sage -testall -long passes except for errors in the
same three files Jaap reported above (and a harmless timeout in
elliptic curves).
Craig: thanks for pointing out SAGE_CHECK. But it strikes me that
there is no way I can run those tests now, without recompiling the
corresponding
On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 12:44 PM, Rob Beezer wrote:
>
> On Jun 27, 9:11 am, Kevin Horton wrote:
>> The first two were reported before. The details of the last one are:
>>
>> sage -t -long "devel/sage/sage/graphs/graph.py"
>> A mysterious error (perhaps a memory error?) occurred, which may have
>
On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 3:39 PM, Pat LeSmithe wrote:
>
> Fedora 10 and 11 packages for the Chromium browser and V8 JavaScript
> engine:
>
> http://spot.fedorapeople.org/chromium/
> http://spot.livejournal.com/308900.html
The ubuntu debs are here:
http://dev.chromium.org/getting-involved/dev-ch
Fedora 10 and 11 packages for the Chromium browser and V8 JavaScript engine:
http://spot.fedorapeople.org/chromium/
http://spot.livejournal.com/308900.html
I needed to install a few missing 32-bit dependencies on 64-bit F10.
Examples:
http://mdp.cti.depaul.edu/3d
http://www.benjoffe.com/code/t
On Jun 27, 9:11 am, Kevin Horton wrote:
> The first two were reported before. The details of the last one are:
>
> sage -t -long "devel/sage/sage/graphs/graph.py"
> A mysterious error (perhaps a memory error?) occurred, which may have
> crashed doctest.
> [69.8 s]
I wasn't clear on
On Jun 27, 12:04 pm, davidloeffler wrote:
> On Jun 27, 8:43 pm, Minh Nguyen wrote:
>
> > #6418: John Palmieri: ref manual fixes for 4.1.alpha1 [Reviewed by
> > Minh Van Nguyen]
>
> \begin{pedantry}
>
> We're going to need another reference-manual-fixing ticket, as there
> are three documentation
Tom Boothby wrote:
> Sage 4.1.alpha2 has been released, find it at
>
> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/boothby/releases
>
> As with 4.1.alpha1, there are two known doctest failures. One is very
> simple to fix, and the other might be tricky. I made an attempt at
> solving them, but Willia
On Jun 27, 8:43 pm, Minh Nguyen wrote:
> #6418: John Palmieri: ref manual fixes for 4.1.alpha1 [Reviewed by
> Minh Van Nguyen]
\begin{pedantry}
We're going to need another reference-manual-fixing ticket, as there
are three documentation build warnings in this alpha2. Two of these
are from the n
Hi folks,
On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 3:44 PM, Tom Boothby wrote:
>
> Sage 4.1.alpha2 has been released, find it at
>
> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/boothby/releases
The following tickets were merged in Sage 4.1.alpha2:
#4712: John Palmieri: Make the doctest timeouts in Sage easily
adjust
2009/6/27 Kevin Horton :
>
> On 27-Jun-09, at 01:44 , Tom Boothby wrote:
>
>>
>> Sage 4.1.alpha2 has been released, find it at
>>
> My first build attempt on 32 bit Ubuntu 8.10 on x86 failed with:
>
> building 'sage.libs.ntl.ntl_ZZ_p' extension
> gcc -fno-strict-aliasing -DNDEBUG -g -fwrapv -O3 -W
On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 4:51 PM, Carlo
Hamalainen wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I know there are some people interested in polymake so I thought I'd
> ask here: can anyone even compile polymake-2.9.6? After sorting out a
:-) I've never heard of anybody successfully building it. However, it might be
better
> Much more complicated would it be to construct a Seifert surface of
> *minimal* genus. It is possible, though, based on the theory of normal
> surfaces that goes back to Wolfgang Haken. In a nutshell (hope I
> remember things correctly):
Yes, you do.
> In the Wiki, I mention a package t3m, th
In the notebook, if I use hg_sage.serve(), I see this:
**
**
* Open your web browser to http://localhost:8200 *
**
**
Hi,
I know there are some people interested in polymake so I thought I'd
ask here: can anyone even compile polymake-2.9.6? After sorting out a
few dependency issues, "make configure" fails with this on Ubuntu
9.04:
make[1]: Entering directory
`/home/carlo/Desktop/polymake-2.9.6/.bootstrap/Term-
On 27-Jun-09, at 01:44 , Tom Boothby wrote:
>
> Sage 4.1.alpha2 has been released, find it at
>
My first build attempt on 32 bit Ubuntu 8.10 on x86 failed with:
building 'sage.libs.ntl.ntl_ZZ_p' extension
gcc -fno-strict-aliasing -DNDEBUG -g -fwrapv -O3 -Wall -Wstrict-
prototypes -fPIC -I/opt/s
OS X -i.e. Solaris, HP-UX, AIX, tru64, SCO, etc.
>> I've not looked around to find out exactly what is meant there I must
>> admit.
>
> I think they must have been referring to one of these UNIX boxes that
> were in the hallway at the Sage Days 16 conference in Barcelona:
On 32-bit ubuntu I get the two failures below, but also one other.
2009/6/27 Rob Beezer :
>
> Builds from source, with two doctest failures on Kubuntu 9.04 on Intel
> Core Duo.
>
> sage -t devel/sage/doc/fr/tutorial/programming.rst # 1 doctests
> failed
> sage -t devel/sage/sage/misc/darwin_uti
On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 9:44 AM, William Stein wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> The Sage Days 16 pictures I took are here:
> http://wstein.org/pics/new/20090627-barcelona_sage_days16/
I loved the shot of the unix fire extinguisher!
> Also, video is posted for all the talks that wer
t; I've not looked around to find out exactly what is meant there I must
> admit.
I think they must have been referring to one of these UNIX boxes that
were in the hallway at the Sage Days 16 conference in Barcelona:
http://wstein.org/pics/new/20090627-barcelona_sage_days16/.html/IMG_2796.h
Hi,
The Sage Days 16 pictures I took are here:
http://wstein.org/pics/new/20090627-barcelona_sage_days16/
Also, video is posted for all the talks that were videod at
http://wiki.sagemath.org/days16
--
William Stein
Associate Professor of Mathematics
University of Washington
http://wstein.org
On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 10:08 AM, daveloeffler wrote:
>
> Back in January, Mike Abshoff announced that there would be a
> collection of old Sage releases kept on sage.math, for testing
> purposes.
>
> Yesterday I wanted to use one of these, and I found that several of
> them didn't work -- there s
I've got a build running on my laptop at the moment, and I was
wondering: why does the install script not run the Flint test suite?
I'm puzzled by this since it did run Flint tests when I installed
4.0.2, which was actually the same Flint spkg version
(flint-1.3.0.p1.spkg)
David
--~--~-~-
That's great, thanks! Hope someone will review it in time for 4.1.
Cheers,
Stan
kcrisman wrote:
> See # 5649.
>
> - kcrisman
> >
>
--
Stan Schymanski
Scientist
Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry
Postfach 10 01 64
D-07701 Jena
Phone: +49.3641.
Sorry, the behaviour I reported is caused by something else. I copied
the cell code that produced different plots at every evaluation into a
new notebook and got consistent results every time. Even copying and
pasting into a new cell got rid of the random behaviour of the axes.
Very weird. I t
Back in January, Mike Abshoff announced that there would be a
collection of old Sage releases kept on sage.math, for testing
purposes.
Yesterday I wanted to use one of these, and I found that several of
them didn't work -- there seems to be some kind of version
incompatibility going on:
davidloe
On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 7:44 AM, Tom Boothby wrote:
>
> Sage 4.1.alpha2 has been released, find it at
>
> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/boothby/releases
I tested upgrading from alpha0, but as suspected, it doesn't work.
Complains about missing mercurial and jinja. (Ubuntu 9.04, amd64).
Fr
44 matches
Mail list logo
