Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
> Jason Grout wrote:
>> Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
>
> The problem I have is the browser can't connect to port 8000, so at that
> point any further interaction with Sage is impossible. Anyway, that's
> another issue, which appears to be specific to my setup. I started that
Jason Grout wrote:
> Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
>> sage: notebook()
>> The notebook files are stored in: /export/home/drkirkby/.sage//sage_notebook
>> **
>> **
>> * Open your web browser to http://localho
On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 11:17 AM, Mike Hansen wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 5:00 PM, Alex Ghitza wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On my dell laptop running archlinux, my build from scratch fails at
>> eclib. I've extracted the relevant part from install.log and posted
>> it at
>>
>> http://www.ms.unime
On May 29, 10:54 pm, David Harvey wrote:
> Hmmm let me try again. Would appreciate help from people familiar with
> FLINT wrapper and/or coercion system.
>
> sage: R. = PolynomialRing(Integers(121))
> sage: S. = PolynomialRing(Integers(11))
> sage: S(50*x)
> 6*y
> sage: R(S(50*x))
> 50*x # !
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 5:46 PM, Jason Grout
wrote:
>
> Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
>> If one starts Sage and types 'notebook()', I believe this should start a
>> server which can be used to connect via a browser.
>>
>> Should the command return, giving a sage prompt, like it would if you
>> typed 1+
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 8:26 PM, Jason Grout
wrote:
>
> The wiki: http://wiki.sagemath.org/
>
> is down.
The server was chugging along no problem (for 10 days), then suddenly:
2009-05-29 08:14:09-0700 [-] Received SIGTERM, shutting down.
2009-05-29 08:14:11-0700 [-] (Port 9001 Closed)
2009-05-2
Jason Grout wrote:
> Mike Hansen wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Sage 4.0.rc2 has been released. Assuming that nothing catastrophic
>> happens, this will become 4.0. The tarball can be
>> found at
>>
>
>
> I just tried to import a patch into queues, and had something that was
> weird. This is a fresh
Mike Hansen wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Sage 4.0.rc2 has been released. Assuming that nothing catastrophic
> happens, this will become 4.0. The tarball can be
> found at
>
I just tried to import a patch into queues, and had something that was
weird. This is a fresh build of 4.0.rc2 on Ubuntu 9.04,
The wiki: http://wiki.sagemath.org/
is down.
Thanks,
Jason
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this
All tests passed on an Ubuntu 8.10 machine.
-Marshall
On May 29, 4:47 pm, Jaap Spies wrote:
> Mike Hansen wrote:
> > Hello,
>
> > Sage 4.0.rc2 has been released. Assuming that nothing catastrophic
> > happens, this will become 4.0. The tarball can be
> > found at
>
> >http://sage.math.washing
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 5:00 PM, Alex Ghitza wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On my dell laptop running archlinux, my build from scratch fails at
> eclib. I've extracted the relevant part from install.log and posted
> it at
>
> http://www.ms.unimelb.edu.au/~aghitza/part_of_install.log
>
> This might have someth
Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
> If one starts Sage and types 'notebook()', I believe this should start a
> server which can be used to connect via a browser.
>
> Should the command return, giving a sage prompt, like it would if you
> typed 1+1 ?
>
> When I type 'notebook()' with 4.0-rc0 on Solaris,
On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 6:36 AM, Mike Hansen wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Sage 4.0.rc2 has been released. Assuming that nothing catastrophic
> happens, this will become 4.0. The tarball can be
> found at
>
> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mhansen/sage-4.0.rc2.tar
>
> and a copy of it to be used
If one starts Sage and types 'notebook()', I believe this should start a
server which can be used to connect via a browser.
Should the command return, giving a sage prompt, like it would if you
typed 1+1 ?
When I type 'notebook()' with 4.0-rc0 on Solaris, I get the following:
--
sage: not
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 2:47 PM, Jaap Spies wrote:
>
> Mike Hansen wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Sage 4.0.rc2 has been released. Assuming that nothing catastrophic
>> happens, this will become 4.0. The tarball can be
>> found at
>>
>> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mhansen/sage-4.0.rc2.tar
>>
O
Mike Hansen wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Sage 4.0.rc2 has been released. Assuming that nothing catastrophic
> happens, this will become 4.0. The tarball can be
> found at
>
> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mhansen/sage-4.0.rc2.tar
>
> and a copy of it to be used for upgrading can be found at
>
As an upgrade, passed all tests on 64-bit Ubuntu 8.10 with Intel Core
Duo.
Rob
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more opt
Hello,
Sage 4.0.rc2 has been released. Assuming that nothing catastrophic
happens, this will become 4.0. The tarball can be
found at
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mhansen/sage-4.0.rc2.tar
and a copy of it to be used for upgrading can be found at
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mh
2009/5/29 Pablo De Napoli :
>
> Hi,
> Sorry for sending my e-mail without subject by mistake to sage-devel.
> I think that your first solution would be much better
> I think it would be nicer to make lcalc a library with a nice api, rather
> than a program only unsable from the command line.
> (wi
Hmmm let me try again. Would appreciate help from people familiar with
FLINT wrapper and/or coercion system.
sage: R. = PolynomialRing(Integers(121))
sage: S. = PolynomialRing(Integers(11))
sage: S(50*x)
6*y
sage: R(S(50*x))
50*x # !!
I think what's actually happening is that the underly
I'm an idiot, it's a not a bug. I misunderstood the definition of
change_ring. Sorry for the noise.
david
On May 29, 7:46 pm, dmharvey wrote:
> Is this a bug?
>
> sage: version()
> 'Sage Version 3.4.2, Release Date: 2009-05-05'
> sage: S. = PolynomialRing(Integers(14641))
> sage: f = 1 + 9581*t
Is this a bug?
sage: version()
'Sage Version 3.4.2, Release Date: 2009-05-05'
sage: S. = PolynomialRing(Integers(14641))
sage: f = 1 + 9581*t
sage: R = PolynomialRing(Integers(1331), "t")
sage: ff = f.change_ring(R)
sage: ff
264*t + 1
sage: type(f)
sage: type(ff)
sage: ff[0]
264*t + 1
sage: f[0
Hi,
Sorry for sending my e-mail without subject by mistake to sage-devel.
I think that your first solution would be much better
I think it would be nicer to make lcalc a library with a nice api, rather
than a program only unsable from the command line.
(with this design the program would call the
Besides numerical noise, I get a bunch of doctest failures triggered
by errors of the form
OSError: [Errno 12] Cannot allocate memory: '/scratch/sage-4.0.rc1/
tmp'
I think this is believed to be a known issue with Python 2.5 on Fedora
x86-64; see tickets #5218 and #6151, which I believe are due
On May 25, 5:58 am, Minh Nguyen wrote:
> OK, I've tweaked planet sage a bit ...
Small update, I've sticked my fingers into the templates and css code.
Now the borders are better and things don't run into each other.
http://planet.sagemath.org/
h
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~
I have a patch which is working (thanks to mabshoff for helping me
remove the horrible memory leak in Tucson). The patch does not have
doctests. It relies on a patch to lcalc itself. I have asked Mike
Rubinstein to make it a part of lcalc. This was more than 2 months
ago. I have not heard anyt
26 matches
Mail list logo
