[sage-devel]

2009-05-28 Thread Pablo De Napoli
Hi, I want to ask about the status of wrapping lcalc library (ticket #5396) I would be interested in helping with that, but there is no patch yet. Pablo --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this

[sage-devel] Re: A command line feature - operate and get next history line

2009-05-28 Thread Kwankyu
On May 29, 9:13 am, Jason Grout wrote: > Kwankyu wrote: > > Hi, > > > I got a reply from GNU readline maintainer Chet Ramey to the following > > wish letter. > > Thanks for following up on this.  So here's a post by Fernando (the > ipython guy) about the issue: > > http://mail.scipy.org/pipermai

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 4.0.rc1 released!

2009-05-28 Thread Justin C. Walker
On May 28, 2009, at 01:46 , Mike Hansen wrote: > > Hello, > > Sage 4.0.rc1 has been released. This should hopefully take care of > the rest of the fallout from the switch to Pynac. The tarball can be > found at > > http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mhansen/sage-4.0.rc1.tar > > and a copy of

[sage-devel] Re: A command line feature - operate and get next history line

2009-05-28 Thread Jason Grout
Kwankyu wrote: > Hi, > > I got a reply from GNU readline maintainer Chet Ramey to the following > wish letter. Thanks for following up on this. So here's a post by Fernando (the ipython guy) about the issue: http://mail.scipy.org/pipermail/ipython-user/2008-June/005465.html It seems like pyr

[sage-devel] A command line feature - operate and get next history line

2009-05-28 Thread Kwankyu
Hi, I got a reply from GNU readline maintainer Chet Ramey to the following wish letter. --- Dear Readline Maintainer, I am a user of Sage, a computer algebra system relying on GNU readline library. In Sage FAQ, you can find the following article. (Magma is another computer algebra sy

[sage-devel] Re: Web page looks pretty poor compared to Mathematica's

2009-05-28 Thread Anthony David
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 10:25 PM, ahmet alper parker wrote: > > Also, why not give them some real life example for why to use a > free/opensource program instead of a commercial one. I think this is > far more important then money. In example, one of a professor at my > university has written a p

[sage-devel] Re: Web page looks pretty poor compared to Mathematica's

2009-05-28 Thread Dr. David Kirkby
ahmet alper parker wrote: > Also, why not give them some real life example for why to use a > free/opensource program instead of a commercial one. I think this is > far more important then money. In example, one of a professor at my > university has written a program on a language which has no sup

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 4.0.rc1 released!

2009-05-28 Thread Franco Saliola
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 10:46 AM, Mike Hansen wrote: > > Hello, > > Sage 4.0.rc1 has been released.  This should hopefully take care of > the rest of the fallout from the switch to Pynac.  The tarball can be > found at > > http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mhansen/sage-4.0.rc1.tar > > and a co

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 4.0.rc1 released!

2009-05-28 Thread Mike Hansen
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 12:21 PM, davidloeffler wrote: > Same for me (SuSE 32-bit). Note that one of the failures in > expression.pyx is *not* numerical noise, it's a hash value -- > presumably a 32/64 bit issue. There is a patch at http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6150 if someone wants

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 4.0.rc1 released!

2009-05-28 Thread davidloeffler
On May 28, 7:00 pm, John Cremona wrote: > 2009/5/28 Marshall Hampton : > > > > > I had the same two numerical noise type failures in matrix2.pyx and > > expression.pyx, on an intel mac running 10.5.  Those were the only > > failures. > > Same here on ubiuntu 32-bit. > > John Same for me (SuSE 32

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 4.0.rc1 released!

2009-05-28 Thread John Cremona
2009/5/28 Marshall Hampton : > > I had the same two numerical noise type failures in matrix2.pyx and > expression.pyx, on an intel mac running 10.5.  Those were the only > failures. > Same here on ubiuntu 32-bit. John > -M. Hampton > > On May 28, 6:04 am, Jaap Spies wrote: >> Mike Hansen wrote

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 4.0.rc1 released!

2009-05-28 Thread Marshall Hampton
I had the same two numerical noise type failures in matrix2.pyx and expression.pyx, on an intel mac running 10.5. Those were the only failures. -M. Hampton On May 28, 6:04 am, Jaap Spies wrote: > Mike Hansen wrote: > > Hello, > > > Sage 4.0.rc1 has been released. This should hopefully take ca

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 4.0.rc1 released!

2009-05-28 Thread davidloeffler
At the end of the compilation, when it generates the reference manual, I'm getting a huge bunch of warning messages from the Sphinx parser. These are due to badly formatted ReST docstrings. I've opened a ticket (#6149) and uploaded a patch -- any volunteers to review this? It would look a bit unpr

[sage-devel] Re: Web page looks pretty poor compared to Mathematica's

2009-05-28 Thread ahmet alper parker
Also, why not give them some real life example for why to use a free/opensource program instead of a commercial one. I think this is far more important then money. In example, one of a professor at my university has written a program on a language which has no support now. And everything he has wr

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 4.0.rc1 released!

2009-05-28 Thread Jaap Spies
Mike Hansen wrote: > Hello, > > Sage 4.0.rc1 has been released. This should hopefully take care of > the rest of the fallout from the switch to Pynac. The tarball can be > found at > > http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mhansen/sage-4.0.rc1.tar > > and a copy of it to be used for upgrading

[sage-devel] Re: Web page looks pretty poor compared to Mathematica's

2009-05-28 Thread ahmet alper parker
Why not ask the users to give their opinions about the web page they use like "did you find what you are looking for?", "could you please rate this page?", or marketing research questionnaires like which mathematics software you use?, what would you like to see at web page?" etc...? On Wed, May 2

[sage-devel] Re: reviewing tickets

2009-05-28 Thread Burcin Erocal
On Thu, 28 May 2009 14:08:32 +1000 Alex Ghitza wrote: > > On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 1:43 PM, Marshall Hampton > wrote: > > > > I wonder if there could be an online mechanism for suggesting > > reviewers.  Sometimes I look at a patch, and I think (for example) > > "I'm not sure I can review this

[sage-devel] Sage 4.0.rc1 released!

2009-05-28 Thread Mike Hansen
Hello, Sage 4.0.rc1 has been released. This should hopefully take care of the rest of the fallout from the switch to Pynac. The tarball can be found at http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mhansen/sage-4.0.rc1.tar and a copy of it to be used for upgrading can be found at http://sage.math.was

[sage-devel] Re: Solaris doctest failure and 'maxima' issue with tests.

2009-05-28 Thread William Stein
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 1:10 AM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote: > > William Stein wrote: > >>> I was on the local host - sitting at the chair in front of my >>> workstation. No ssh/telnet or similar. >>> >>> I quit sage, removed the directory .sage, then started again, using >>> >>> notebook(address="",

[sage-devel] Re: Solaris doctest failure and 'maxima' issue with tests.

2009-05-28 Thread Dr. David Kirkby
William Stein wrote: >> I was on the local host - sitting at the chair in front of my >> workstation. No ssh/telnet or similar. >> >> I quit sage, removed the directory .sage, then started again, using >> >> notebook(address="", open_viewer=False) >> >> just for a test. Again, there is nothing I

[sage-devel] Re: Various questions on data bases for Sage

2009-05-28 Thread Michael Brickenstein
Hi! Actually, regarding online databases. There exists RUM. http://python-rum.org/ Guess, who is co-lead developer of that package... Using an SA model, you can set up an online frontend to your database. For your application, the following feature's can help: - it is possible to feed it with si

[sage-devel] Re: Various questions on data bases for Sage

2009-05-28 Thread simon . king
Hi William! On May 27, 7:21 pm, William Stein wrote: > > I have written simple sage code to interface to his webpages, but > > that's the easy part :) I think you will find a web interface is much > > more useful than a *giant* download for the true acolytes. > > I think this depends somewhat o