[sage-devel] Re: Commutative diagrams in notebook

Hold that thought Rob. I'm not joking around. If you have been a significant contributor to this sort of thing, you sound like exactly the sort of person to have contributing to and working on such an enterprise. This is so easy to get going it isn't funny. We could simply start with a website wh

[sage-devel] Re: Commutative diagrams in notebook

Hi Bill, Well, I really was just joking around about the "distinguished" bit. ;-) You've got some great points. Maintaining version x.y.z of the necessary software is a very interesting idea, though I'd guess maybe at some point the lifetime of hardware might end up being a limiting factor? I

[sage-devel] Re: Commutative diagrams in notebook

I think JSage has a slightly different focus. Specifically: * It is tied to the Sage Python library * It is intended for people who have a complementary publication in a traditional journal * The code has to be included in Sage and be maintained there * The board of editors consists of Sage devel

[sage-devel] Re: Commutative diagrams in notebook

Hi Bill, That all sounds great. But first you'll have to find somebody "distinguished." ;-) Seriously, I see no real reason there can't be interactive research articles, interactive textbooks and interactive classroom demonstrations, all with the power of Sage right at the fingertips of the re

[sage-devel] Re: Quick Reference: Calculus

Thanks. I fixed it. On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 8:51 PM, J Elaych wrote: > > Really cool, but there's a typo in the Piecewise example:  it > should be 'sin(1/x)' to sync with the plot. > > On Apr 10, 6:11 pm, William Stein wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I made the first topic-specific Sage Quick Reference gu

[sage-devel] Re: Quick Reference: Calculus

Really cool, but there's a typo in the Piecewise example: it should be 'sin(1/x)' to sync with the plot. On Apr 10, 6:11 pm, William Stein wrote: > Hi, > > I made the first topic-specific Sage Quick Reference guide.  It's for > Calculus. > >    http://wiki.sagemath.org/quickref?action=AttachFi

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.4.1.rc2 released

Ubuntu 9.04 beta (Jaunty), compiled and tested fine with 'export MAKE=make -j2' and 'make'. Using it now. On Apr 11, 1:22 am, mabshoff wrote: > Hello, > > this is 3.4.1.rc2. Loads of Solaris fixes for doctests, additional > doctests, several spkg updates and misc fixes. All the details can be >

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.4.1.rc2 released

Built from scratch on Fedora 10 (64-bit Opteron 250), failed two doctests on the first try: sage -t "devel/sage/sage/calculus/calculus.py" sage -t "devel/sage/sage/calculus/equations.py" both on timeouts. I tried them both individually: equations.py ran in 30 seconds, calculus.

[sage-devel] Re: linear programming via lp_solve in sage

I have made an spkg for lp_solve and posted to sage-devel a message in September 2008 about including it into Sage. I did not receive any positive responses. The spkg and a demo file domination.py can be downloaded at: http://www.math.unl.edu/~shartke2/files/

[sage-devel] Re: Adding a trivial docstring confuses testing

On Apr 11, 5:59 pm, William Stein wrote: > You could post your file. Its at http://buzzard.ups.edu/private/latex.py This is the fubared version of sage/misc/latex.py (which I am in the middle of working on). It contains one doctest that I've edited heavily, so some changes seem to be allowed

[sage-devel] Re: Adding a trivial docstring confuses testing

On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 5:57 PM, Rob Beezer wrote: > > I've been adding documentation to sage/misc/latex.py and discovered > that if I add a trivial docstring (empty, one-line, other variants of > trivial) to the first function in the file  (which is  "have_dvipng") > then a test run on that file

[sage-devel] Re: Commutative diagrams in notebook

Thanks Rob. It is great to see I am not the only person who has gotten excited. This idea is s good I am having trouble finding a reason to not Just Do It TM. I know there is a Sage Journal idea floated (JSage). So some of what I am thinking is surely motivated by that. Here is what I envisio

[sage-devel] Adding a trivial docstring confuses testing

I've been adding documentation to sage/misc/latex.py and discovered that if I add a trivial docstring (empty, one-line, other variants of trivial) to the first function in the file (which is "have_dvipng") then a test run on that file really goes haywire. Take out the trivial docstring and all

[sage-devel] Re: Commutative diagrams in notebook

Hi Bill, Grab the worksheet at http://buzzard.ups.edu/sage/sage-group-theory-primer.sws for an example of an interactive SagePaper (tm). There should even be an @interact cell that will build a nicely formatted table of the subgroups of a finite cyclic group, given the order of the group. On

[sage-devel] Re: Commutative diagrams in notebook

Another suggestion. Has anyone thought about having SagePapers TM, which would be an arxiv of both technical mathematical papers and expository notes written entirely in Sage worksheets? This would be really cool, as it would allow the reader of the paper to play with the Sage/GP/Magma/whatever e

[sage-devel] Re: Commutative diagrams in notebook

Ah, silly me. The "evaluate" goes away when another cell is selected. No need to worry about solving that "problem". By the way, how do I use the %latex mode in a cell? It looks like it expects whatever you would have in a latex slide. But $2+2$ for example does not latex. Bill. On 12 Apr, 00

[sage-devel] Re: Commutative diagrams in notebook

It doesn't seem to be imported by default. There's no other diagram package imported by default is there? I guess it would be even better to be able to do CD's outside cells, but would I be correct in thinking that is a limitation of jsMath, not the notebook? I'm really impressed by the notebook

[sage-devel] Re: Commutative diagrams in notebook

On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 3:04 PM, Bill Hart wrote: > > Is there a way to latex using amscd for commutative diagrams in the > notebook? This would be an extremely useful feature. > > I guess one is limited by the latex features that are available in a > webpage. > One option is to at least use %la

[sage-devel] Re: worth of sagemath.com?

On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 2:31 PM, David Joyner wrote: > > Hi: > > Amusing exercise: Type sagemath.com into http://www.stimator.com/ > to find out what the sagemath site is worth. Maybe someone can explain > what $329K means? And sagemath.org is worth: USD $965,948. I'm a millionaire! :-) --

[sage-devel] Commutative diagrams in notebook

Is there a way to latex using amscd for commutative diagrams in the notebook? This would be an extremely useful feature. I guess one is limited by the latex features that are available in a webpage. Bill. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to

[sage-devel] worth of sagemath.com?

Hi: Amusing exercise: Type sagemath.com into http://www.stimator.com/ to find out what the sagemath site is worth. Maybe someone can explain what $329K means? - David --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubs

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.4.1.rc2 released

On Apr 11, 2009, at 01:22 , mabshoff wrote: > > Hello, > > this is 3.4.1.rc2. Loads of Solaris fixes for doctests, additional > doctests, several spkg updates and misc fixes. All the details can be > seen in the list below, but note that the number of patches merged is > much larger than origina

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.4.1.rc2 released

On Apr 11, 1:06 pm, Robert Bradshaw wrote: > I got an error building on OS X 10.4 > > /Users/robert/sage/sage-3.4.1.rc2/local/lib/libmpir.dylib > (sizeinbase.o) definition of ___gmpz_sizeinbase > /Users/robert/sage/sage-3.4.1.rc2/local/lib/libgmp.dylib > (sizeinbase.o) definition of ___gmpz_siz

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.4.1.rc2 released

I got an error building on OS X 10.4 /Users/robert/sage/sage-3.4.1.rc2/local/lib/libmpir.dylib (sizeinbase.o) definition of ___gmpz_sizeinbase /Users/robert/sage/sage-3.4.1.rc2/local/lib/libgmp.dylib (sizeinbase.o) definition of ___gmpz_sizeinbase /usr/bin/libtool: internal link edit command fa

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.4.1.rc2 released

> On Fedora 9, 32 bit all tests passed. Ditto on ubuntu 32-bit and Suse 64-bit, both vuilt from scratch. John --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-devel-unsubscr

[sage-devel] Re: linear programming via lp_solve in sage

David Joyner wrote: The paper http://www.lehigh.edu/~tkr2/research/papers/MILP04.pdf provides a survey of "non-commercial" LP solvers. It appears that COIN-OR's Symphany package solves a wider class of problems by that (in one comparison at least) lp_solve is relatively fast. Do you agree? Can yo

[sage-devel] Re: linear programming via lp_solve in sage

The paper http://www.lehigh.edu/~tkr2/research/papers/MILP04.pdf provides a survey of "non-commercial" LP solvers. It appears that COIN-OR's Symphany package solves a wider class of problems by that (in one comparison at least) lp_solve is relatively fast. Do you agree? Can you offer other compari

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.4.1.rc2 released

mabshoff wrote: > Hello, > > this is 3.4.1.rc2. Loads of Solaris fixes for doctests, additional > doctests, several spkg updates and misc fixes. All the details can be > seen in the list below, but note that the number of patches merged is > much larger than originally intended and announced. Thi

[sage-devel] Re: notebook problems /w chrome 2

Harald Schilly wrote: > > > On Apr 9, 9:28 pm, Jason Grout wrote: >> I've installed Chromium on Ubuntu (I think there's even a .deb for it). >> > > there is no working native linux build of chrome or chromium. only > something very old for wine. > the branch for linux development has some sort

[sage-devel] Re: linear programming via lp_solve in sage

peno wrote: > I am one of the developers of lp_solve, an open-source mixed integer > linear > programming solver. See http://lpsolve.sourceforge.net/5.5/ for the > reference guide. > > lp_solve has a very rich API to model and solve MILP models. > The API is contained in a library (written in C)

[sage-devel] linear programming via lp_solve in sage

I am one of the developers of lp_solve, an open-source mixed integer linear programming solver. See http://lpsolve.sourceforge.net/5.5/ for the reference guide. lp_solve has a very rich API to model and solve MILP models. The API is contained in a library (written in C) that can be called from al

[sage-devel] Sage 3.4.1.rc2 released

Hello, this is 3.4.1.rc2. Loads of Solaris fixes for doctests, additional doctests, several spkg updates and misc fixes. All the details can be seen in the list below, but note that the number of patches merged is much larger than originally intended and announced. This build will be the basis of