Funny, I must be receiving a lot fewer adds than everybody else. If I
type "sagemath" into Google, I get no adds whatsoever, if I type "sage
math" I get one add saying:
"Sage Math
Looking for Sage Math? Find almost everything on eBay!"
As expected, when I click on the link, Ebay returns 0 item
I've been looking through the methods for ZZ with a view to doing a
Magma/Sage comparison for marketing purposes. I've been noticing a few
issues as I go. There's going to be lots of these, so I think I should
give my list in small blocks. I can file trac tickets for them once
someone verifies tha
On Apr 7, 10:43 pm, William Stein wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 8:21 PM, Strav wrote:
> > Thanks!
>
> This was fixed by John Palmieri recently. See
>
> http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/5636
>
> and
>
> http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/5638
>
> William
And by the way:
On Apr 7, 2009, at 10:26 PM, Bill Hart wrote:
>
> William didn't mention the context of this, which is that for small
> integers most of the time taken by the divisors method in ZZ is taken
> up with factoring. It seems much more likely people will use small
> numbers as inputs to this, so this i
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 8:21 PM, Strav wrote:
>
> (Not certain if I should report this bug here)
>
> For sage version: 3.0.5dfsg-3 I get the following error when trying to
> run, as is, the jsmath example included in the docs. (note that I do
> have all the jsmath packages and fonts installed)
>
>
William didn't mention the context of this, which is that for small
integers most of the time taken by the divisors method in ZZ is taken
up with factoring. It seems much more likely people will use small
numbers as inputs to this, so this is a shame, given the amount of
work that (I hear) went in
(Not certain if I should report this bug here)
For sage version: 3.0.5dfsg-3 I get the following error when trying to
run, as is, the jsmath example included in the docs. (note that I do
have all the jsmath packages and fonts installed)
sage: f = maxima('1/(x^2+1)')
sage: jsmath(f)
On Apr 7, 10:11 pm, "Justin C. Walker" wrote:
> Hi, Michael,
Hi Justin,
> > That one is fixed. I am surprised you did not get the mosky failure,
> > but I suspected if you did a -ba you would hit it.
>
> Ha! I just (well, a while back) did './sage -ba' and then
> ./sage -t devel/sage
Proof won't make a difference on the numbers I'm using, which are less
than 1,000,000. Pari does the same thing for proving primality below
about 10^13 or something like that, whether proved or not (the
pseudoprimality test it uses is known to have no counterexample). By
the way, the FLINT functio
Hi, Michael,
On Apr 7, 2009, at 17:40 , mabshoff wrote:
> On Apr 7, 3:27 pm, "Justin C. Walker" wrote:
>> On Apr 6, 2009, at 14:42 , mabshoff wrote:
>>> here goes 3.4.1.rc1. This is actually a release that will build on
>>> OSX
>>> unlike 3.4.1.rc0.
>> [snip]
>>> You can upgrade to 3.4.1.rc1 b
On Apr 7, 9:52 pm, William Stein wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 8:30 PM, Alex Ghitza wrote:
> Moinmoin in Sage is still stuck at the version from 3 years ago, which
> doesn't even support textcha's. When the new moinmoin is put into
> sage... whenever that is (!?), then it should support
On Apr 7, 2009, at 9:49 PM, William Stein wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 9:24 PM, Bill Hart
> wrote:
>> The reason it runs slow is a.factor() is bizarrely slow in Sage. It's
>> like a factor of 50 times slower than Pari.
>
> There are some differences:
>(1) pari's factor is *not* prova
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 8:30 PM, Alex Ghitza wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> It's pretty nifty to have MoinMoin packaged in Sage so you have a wiki
> practically at your fingertips. It's also neat that it comes with
> jsmath enabled. Would it be possible to go one more step in the
> direction of user-friendl
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 9:24 PM, Bill Hart wrote:
> The reason it runs slow is a.factor() is bizarrely slow in Sage. It's
> like a factor of 50 times slower than Pari.
There are some differences:
(1) pari's factor is *not* provably correct, but Sage's is. [That
said, this will make no differe
Hi,
It's pretty nifty to have MoinMoin packaged in Sage so you have a wiki
practically at your fingertips. It's also neat that it comes with
jsmath enabled. Would it be possible to go one more step in the
direction of user-friendliness and have it come with textcha's enabled
by default? (Just
In case there's interest... Tim Gowers' Tricki is now pre-live:
http://prelive.tricki.org/ .
Here's a description from the current main page:
"Welcome to a brand new Wiki-style site that is intended to develop into
a large store of useful mathematical problem-solving techniques. Some of
these
On Apr 7, 5:37 pm, Alex Ghitza wrote:
Hi Alex,
> I upgraded from rc0 on four different machines running 32-bit
> Archlinux. Testing fails on three files:
>
> sage -t "devel/sage/sage/structure/sage_object.pyx"
See the comment about that regarding Jaap which had the same problem.
Th
On Apr 7, 3:27 pm, "Justin C. Walker" wrote:
> On Apr 6, 2009, at 14:42 , mabshoff wrote:
Hi Justin,
> > here goes 3.4.1.rc1. This is actually a release that will build on OSX
> > unlike 3.4.1.rc0.
> [snip]
> > You can upgrade to 3.4.1.rc1 by running
>
> > ./sage
> > -upgradehttp://sage.math
I upgraded from rc0 on four different machines running 32-bit
Archlinux. Testing fails on three files:
sage -t "devel/sage/sage/structure/sage_object.pyx"
sage -t "devel/sage/sage/algebras/quaternion_algebra_element.py"
sage -t "devel/sage/sage/combinat/words/words.py"
On Apr 6, 2009, at 14:42 , mabshoff wrote:
> here goes 3.4.1.rc1. This is actually a release that will build on OSX
> unlike 3.4.1.rc0.
[snip]
> You can upgrade to 3.4.1.rc1 by running
>
> ./sage -upgrade
> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/release-cycles-3.4.1/sage-3.4.1.rc1/
>
> S
I did that, restarted Sage and my Browser. The ugly message has gone
away, but I still don't see pretty equations ;-( Is there something
else I need to do?
Brian
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 2:17 PM, William Stein wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 12:55 PM, Brian Granger
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>>
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 2:17 PM, William Stein wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 12:55 PM, Brian Granger
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am using Sage 3.2.3 on my Mac (localhost notebook server). When I
>> load a notebook that has latex in it I get:
>>
>> "It looks like jsMath failed to set up prope
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 12:55 PM, Brian Granger wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I am using Sage 3.2.3 on my Mac (localhost notebook server). When I
> load a notebook that has latex in it I get:
>
> "It looks like jsMath failed to set up properly (error code -7).
> I will try to keep going, but it could get ug
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 12:55 PM, Brian Granger wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I am using Sage 3.2.3 on my Mac (localhost notebook server). When I
> load a notebook that has latex in it I get:
>
> "It looks like jsMath failed to set up properly (error code -7).
> I will try to keep going, but it could get ug
> That seems awfully complicated. How about (untested):
>
> sage_python = python
> from sympy import *
> python = sage_python
>
> or (even shorter, and still untested):
>
> from sympy import *
> restore('python')
Sure these may work, but in my mind they are temporary hacks.
> The %whatever synt
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 1:26 PM, Carl Witty wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 12:16 PM, Brian Granger
> wrote:
>>
>> Ahh, that makes sense. It is the sympy.python thing that causes the
>> problem. This hack seems to work fix the issue in the notebook:
>>
>> import sympy
>> sympy.sage_python =
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 12:16 PM, Brian Granger wrote:
>
> Ahh, that makes sense. It is the sympy.python thing that causes the
> problem. This hack seems to work fix the issue in the notebook:
>
> import sympy
> sympy.sage_python = sympy.python
> del sympy.python
> from sympy import *
>
> But an
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 12:16 PM, Brian Granger wrote:
>
> Ahh, that makes sense. It is the sympy.python thing that causes the
> problem. This hack seems to work fix the issue in the notebook:
>
> import sympy
> sympy.sage_python = sympy.python
> del sympy.python
> from sympy import *
>
> But an
Hi,
I am using Sage 3.2.3 on my Mac (localhost notebook server). When I
load a notebook that has latex in it I get:
"It looks like jsMath failed to set up properly (error code -7).
I will try to keep going, but it could get ugly."
The thing that is odd is that when I load a notebook from the s
Ahh, that makes sense. It is the sympy.python thing that causes the
problem. This hack seems to work fix the issue in the notebook:
import sympy
sympy.sage_python = sympy.python
del sympy.python
from sympy import *
But any code in sympy that uses sympy.python will now fail. Really
this is a b
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 11:01 AM, Brian Granger wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I am using the sage 3.2.3 notebook. I am using it in python mode and
> am having trouble with sympy:
>
> from sympy import *
> x = var('x')
>
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "", line 1, in
> File "/Users/bgranger/.s
On Apr 7, 2009, at 8:48 AM, Golam Mortuza Hossain wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> I will be happy to hear any issues that you may find
> in it, before I open a ticket for this enhancement.
I've only been marginally following this issue (thanks for all your
work on it BTW) but typically it's better to creat
I just independently found this bug (I just posted to the list). The
problem seems to be with the line:
from sympy import *
line that both of us are using in python mode.
Brian
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 8:11 AM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>
> On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 8:04 AM, William Stein wrote:
>>
>
Hi,
I am using the sage 3.2.3 notebook. I am using it in python mode and
am having trouble with sympy:
from sympy import *
x = var('x')
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "", line 1, in
File "/Users/bgranger/.sage/sage_notebook/worksheets/admin/1/code/9.py",
line 6, in
print _su
William Stein wrote:
>
> sage -t -long "devel/sage/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/monsky_washnitzer.py"
> **
> File
> "/Users/was/build/sage-3.4.1.rc1/devel/sage/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/monsky_washnitzer.py",
> line 1562:
>
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 2:42 PM, mabshoff wrote:
>
> Ok,
>
> here goes 3.4.1.rc1. This is actually a release that will build on OSX
> unlike 3.4.1.rc0. I also merged a couple other patches I had wanted in
> 3.4.1, but had barely missed rc0. Note that due to 3.4.1 having taken
> nearly a months the
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 6:56 AM, John Cremona wrote:
>
> Built fine on 64-bit Suse linux; one test failed the first time and
> then passed:
>
> The following tests failed:
>
>
> sage -t "devel/sage/sage/interfaces/sage0.py"
> Total time for all tests: 2846.3 seconds
> Please see /home/jec
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 7:38 AM, Dr. David Kirkby
wrote:
>
> It's interesting the lower cost version of Mathematica is available
> for every platform except Solaris. From reading the Solaris
> newsgroups, there are several who intend complaining about that to
> Wolfram Research.
I've also heard r
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 10:11 PM, Jason Grout
wrote:
>
>> Should I submit patches for each of these functions
>> separately?
>
> I think one patch covering all of the functions would be fine. It's one
> logical issue.
... So here goes the patch to enhance the typesetting capability
of symbo
kcrisman wrote:
>
>> How clever is Google? Perhaps they argue:
>> - "On the Sage pages, we frequently find the phrase 'viable open
>> source alternative to Mathematica' (or something in that spirit)"
>> - Hence, Mathematica is relevant to Sage.
>> - Hence, if people search for Sage, it makes s
It's interesting the lower cost version of Mathematica is available
for every platform except Solaris. From reading the Solaris
newsgroups, there are several who intend complaining about that to
Wolfram Research.
Sticking 'Mathematica Solaris' into Google brings up no sponsored
links. Top hit it
> How clever is Google? Perhaps they argue:
> - "On the Sage pages, we frequently find the phrase 'viable open
> source alternative to Mathematica' (or something in that spirit)"
> - Hence, Mathematica is relevant to Sage.
> - Hence, if people search for Sage, it makes sense to show them a
> M
Hi All!
On 7 Apr., 05:45, Harald Schilly wrote:
> 1. the reason why it comes up for "sage math" but not for "math" alone
> is, simply because a search for "math" is too unspecific and all
> others in the pool bidding for this word are selected. indeed, with a
> very low probability you will see
On Apr 7, 10:45 am, Harald Schilly wrote:
> Hi, I've some experience with google advertising, and my answer is to
> that questions no!
>
> 1. the reason why it comes up for "sage math" but not for "math" alone
> is, simply because a search for "math" is too unspecific and all
> others in the pool
Built fine on 64-bit Suse linux; one test failed the first time and
then passed:
The following tests failed:
sage -t "devel/sage/sage/interfaces/sage0.py"
Total time for all tests: 2846.3 seconds
Please see /home/jec/sage-3.4.1.rc1/tmp/test.log for the complete log
from this test.
j..
On Apr 6, 11:10 pm, William Stein wrote:
> I think it is *highly* likely they did, since it is the *only* ad, it
> is for the cheapest version of Mathematica, and that ad doesn't come
> up for searches for "math".
I'm directed to the home version at $295, and the regular student
version is $139.
Hi, I've some experience with google advertising, and my answer is to
that questions no!
1. the reason why it comes up for "sage math" but not for "math" alone
is, simply because a search for "math" is too unspecific and all
others in the pool bidding for this word are selected. indeed, with a
ve
Hello folks,
I spend the evening fixing OSX 10.6 build bugs in Sage since we want
to be ready once it is release in a couple months. Since I am running
a development snapshot on my laptop I figured it would be good to have
a working Sage again locally. It only takes a couple patches to get
Sage t
48 matches
Mail list logo
