Hi,
I just noticed ipython doing:
In [4]: print f.series(x)
--> print(f.series(x))
1 - a*x + a**2*x**2 - a**3*x**3 + a**4*x**4 - a**5*x**5 + O(x**6)
and I like it, so it may be a nice idea for sage to be able to
optionally turn this on, so that it shows what the preparser is doing
to the ex
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 6:36 PM, Minh Nguyen wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> It seems like I can't ping sage.math at all. My previous connections
> have timed out and I can't even get the site
>
> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home
>
> Does anyone have any ideas on what's going on?
The power in the s
I'm in favor of making some of these LaTeX choices configurable.
William's example of the grouping symbols for matrices (e.g. square
brackets or large parentheses) is the first thing I thought of. I
never liked Mathematica's choice and was always just cutting out the
rows of a matrix to use withi
Minh Nguyen wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> It seems like I can't ping sage.math at all. My previous connections
> have timed out and I can't even get the site
>
> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home
>
> Does anyone have any ideas on what's going on?
>
Same here:
$ ping sage.math.washington.edu
PING
Hi folks,
It seems like I can't ping sage.math at all. My previous connections
have timed out and I can't even get the site
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home
Does anyone have any ideas on what's going on?
--
Regards
Minh Van Nguyen
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To
Alfredo,
I'm as glad as you to work together to achieve a better
distro in all senses, not to mention the honor it is to me
to have this opportunity.
I think the way you went choosing the method is perfect
and that the key to improve the LiveCD is just to choose
which packages to keep and the one
Hi.
1) Sorry, I've forgotten to switch to LANG=en
before.
2) I'm going to rebuild from scratch and
post the whole log. I use an old computer,
so it will take some time.
3)
"ls /opt/sage-3.4/spkg/installed" returns :
atlas-3.8.3.p0
blas-20070724
bzip2-1.0.5
conway_polynomials-0.2
cython-0.10.3
William Stein wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 11:22 AM, John H Palmieri
> wrote:
>> On Mar 24, 10:48 am, Jason Grout wrote:
>>> I'm curious what the persuasive reasoning was. I've always liked mathbb.
>> My impression is that people (maybe Bourbaki?) decided that bold-face
>> should be used fo
It would be nice have user-configurable settings like this. I
definitely prefer mathbb - I think its nice to have special symbols
for things like the rationals (as \mathbb{Q}); it lets you use Q as a
variable or other object without confusion.
-Marshall
On Mar 24, 2:00 pm, William Stein wrote:
Well,
"Aucun fichier ou répertoire de ce type" is french for "No file or
directory of this type". So some headers cannot be found, and this
strongly suggests that something went wrong before the Sage library
(sage-3.4.spkg) was processed.
Is the install log overwritten by subsequent make "runs"?
Hi Peter,
some notes on your questions regarding "Sage packaging":
Sage itself is designed in such as way, that it is possible to have
quite different versions of Sage installed at the same time, and
anywhere in your file system. Since different versions of Sage in
general do depend on different
2009/3/24 William Stein :
>
> On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 8:02 AM, bourbabis wrote:
>>
>> Hello SAGE people.
>>
>> Everything is in the title. Several attempts with "make" leading to
>> the exact same point of failure.
>>
>> The install log file :
>> http://download206.mediafire.com/nzjxxh0x9jmg/4lj
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 11:22 AM, John H Palmieri
wrote:
>
> On Mar 24, 10:48 am, Jason Grout wrote:
>> William Stein wrote:
>> > On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 9:58 AM, John H Palmieri
>> > wrote:
>> >> Currently the latex methods for ZZ, RR, etc. all used mathbf -- plain
>> >> boldface -- rather th
On Mar 24, 10:48 am, Jason Grout wrote:
> William Stein wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 9:58 AM, John H Palmieri
> > wrote:
> >> Currently the latex methods for ZZ, RR, etc. all used mathbf -- plain
> >> boldface -- rather than mathbb -- 'blackboard' bold. See also the (not
> >> currently in
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 8:02 AM, bourbabis wrote:
>
> Hello SAGE people.
>
> Everything is in the title. Several attempts with "make" leading to
> the exact same point of failure.
>
> The install log file :
> http://download206.mediafire.com/nzjxxh0x9jmg/4ljzjnh2mdd/install.log
That log only sh
Hi Lucio,
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 1:29 PM, Lucio Lastra wrote:
> I finally got your point. Sincerely I didn't know that such thing as
> requesting
> a particular feature in the LiveCD was possible, that's why I built mine.
>
> I also want to make clear that my intention is not to take your plac
William Stein wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 9:58 AM, John H Palmieri
> wrote:
>> Currently the latex methods for ZZ, RR, etc. all used mathbf -- plain
>> boldface -- rather than mathbb -- 'blackboard' bold. See also the (not
>> currently in use) file SAGE_ROOT/devel/sage/doc/common/macros.tex
You all make good points. Certainly more documentation for applied
stuff is called for, and I really like the idea of a configuration
command to avert having to maintain a separate version. Didn't even
think of that!
As regards size, I do think that it would be an important factor. I am
much mor
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 10:27 AM, mabshoff wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mar 24, 1:27 am, William Stein wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 3:39 PM, mabshoff wrote:
>
>
>
>> I temporarily put a few ip's into /etc/resolv.conf until I can restart
>> the vmware server safely (i.e., I'm onsite), and according t
Alfredo,
I finally got your point. Sincerely I didn't know that such thing as
requesting
a particular feature in the LiveCD was possible, that's why I built mine.
I also want to make clear that my intention is not to take your place or
anyone's, I just built that distro and thought it would be ni
On Mar 24, 1:27 am, William Stein wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 3:39 PM, mabshoff wrote:
> I temporarily put a few ip's into /etc/resolv.conf until I can restart
> the vmware server safely (i.e., I'm onsite), and according to
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac
>
> it looks like
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 9:58 AM, John H Palmieri wrote:
>
> Currently the latex methods for ZZ, RR, etc. all used mathbf -- plain
> boldface -- rather than mathbb -- 'blackboard' bold. See also the (not
> currently in use) file SAGE_ROOT/devel/sage/doc/common/macros.tex:
> lots of mathbf, no math
Currently the latex methods for ZZ, RR, etc. all used mathbf -- plain
boldface -- rather than mathbb -- 'blackboard' bold. See also the (not
currently in use) file SAGE_ROOT/devel/sage/doc/common/macros.tex:
lots of mathbf, no mathbb.
Is this an official style choice for Sage, or did it just
spon
Minh Nguyen wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 9:47 AM, Jaap Spies wrote:
>
>
>
>>> On a note related to the Scilab <---> Sage interface, there's an
>>> experimental spkg up on trac. See ticket #4821 at
>>>
>>> http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/4821
>>>
>>> But the Scilab version for the
Hello SAGE people.
Everything is in the title. Several attempts with "make" leading to
the exact same point of failure.
The install log file :
http://download206.mediafire.com/nzjxxh0x9jmg/4ljzjnh2mdd/install.log
I'm on Debian Lenny with gcc -v :
Using built-in specs.
Target: i486-linux-gnu
C
On 2009-Mar-23 12:38:45 -0700, mabshoff wrote:
>> FreeBSD and I've reached the point where I can compile sage-3.4 on
>> FreeBSD-8/amd64 (using gcc/g++/gfortran 4.3) and get it to start.
>
>Which FreeBSD release are you using?
As I said, 8-current/amd64.
>This is way too much - I get Sage to buil
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 9:47 AM, Jaap Spies wrote:
>
>> On a note related to the Scilab <---> Sage interface, there's an
>> experimental spkg up on trac. See ticket #4821 at
>>
>> http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/4821
>>
>> But the Scilab version for the spkg is a bit outdated. Anyone
Minh Nguyen wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 4:38 AM, Hazem wrote:
>
>
>
>>> As regards Scilab and Sage, I think that Ronan Paixão has worked on a
>>> Sage-Scilab interface. From my reading of the Scilab license, I think
>>> it can be legally problematic to include Scilab in Sage, but I'm not
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 4:38 AM, Hazem wrote:
>
>> As regards Scilab and Sage, I think that Ronan Paixão has worked on a
>> Sage-Scilab interface. From my reading of the Scilab license, I think
>> it can be legally problematic to include Scilab in Sage, but I'm not a
>> lawyer. David Joyner kn
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 3:39 PM, mabshoff wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mar 22, 10:27 pm, William Stein wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
>
>> The current trac.sagemath.org mail notification section is the following:
>>
>> [notification]
>> always_notify_owner = true
>> always_notify_reporter = true
>> always_notify_up
30 matches
Mail list logo
