[sage-devel] Re: Longest and most pointless Sage build ever?

2009-02-17 Thread mhampton
Can you post a picture of it running Sage? Very impressive work! -Marshall On Feb 18, 5:52 am, Carl Witty wrote: > I have compiled and run Sage 3.2.3 on my T-Mobile G1 cell phone, and > large portions of it actually work. > > 300 files had failing doctests; this means that all doctests passed

[sage-devel] Re: TinyMCE in sage-3.3: How to insert a new text cell?

2009-02-17 Thread Rob Beezer
Sure! The best of both worlds? This would put placement of the "new" function in the same place it always has been, for both code and text.And it would give the new user some idea of just what the blue bar is for anyway. Rather than "code," would "commands" make more sense to the new user w

[sage-devel] Re: Longest and most pointless Sage build ever?

2009-02-17 Thread M. Edward (Ed) Borasky
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 8:21 PM, Carl Witty wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 8:11 PM, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky > wrote: >> >> On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 7:52 PM, Carl Witty wrote: >>> >>> I have compiled and run Sage 3.2.3 on my T-Mobile G1 cell phone, and >>> large portions of it actually work. >

[sage-devel] Re: TinyMCE in sage-3.3: How to insert a new text cell?

2009-02-17 Thread Jason Grout
Rob Beezer wrote: > On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 12:22 PM, William Stein wrote: > >> Any suggestions? > > I'm thinking about the new user, who (a) doesn't know at all that you > can add text (b) can't figure out why there are two colors for the > bars or (c) tries to type code into TinyMCE and can't

[sage-devel] Re: TinyMCE in sage-3.3: How to insert a new text cell?

2009-02-17 Thread William Stein
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 8:27 PM, Rob Beezer wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 12:22 PM, William Stein wrote: > >> Any suggestions? > > I'm thinking about the new user, who (a) doesn't know at all that you > can add text (b) can't figure out why there are two colors for the > bars or (c) tries to

[sage-devel] Re: TinyMCE in sage-3.3: How to insert a new text cell?

2009-02-17 Thread Rob Beezer
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 12:22 PM, William Stein wrote: > Any suggestions? I'm thinking about the new user, who (a) doesn't know at all that you can add text (b) can't figure out why there are two colors for the bars or (c) tries to type code into TinyMCE and can't get it to evaluate. What about

[sage-devel] Re: Longest and most pointless Sage build ever?

2009-02-17 Thread Carl Witty
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 8:11 PM, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 7:52 PM, Carl Witty wrote: >> >> I have compiled and run Sage 3.2.3 on my T-Mobile G1 cell phone, and >> large portions of it actually work. >> > [snip] > > Interesting, but how about a Sage *server* that

[sage-devel] Re: Longest and most pointless Sage build ever?

2009-02-17 Thread John H Palmieri
Wow, this is great! This is the best argument I've seen for getting a G1. On Feb 17, 7:52 pm, Carl Witty wrote: > I have compiled and run Sage 3.2.3 on my T-Mobile G1 cell phone, and > large portions of it actually work. > > 300 files had failing doctests; this means that all doctests passed in

[sage-devel] Re: Longest and most pointless Sage build ever?

2009-02-17 Thread William Stein
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 8:11 PM, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 7:52 PM, Carl Witty wrote: >> >> I have compiled and run Sage 3.2.3 on my T-Mobile G1 cell phone, and >> large portions of it actually work. >> > [snip] > > Interesting, but how about a Sage *server* that

[sage-devel] Re: Longest and most pointless Sage build ever?

2009-02-17 Thread M. Edward (Ed) Borasky
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 7:52 PM, Carl Witty wrote: > > I have compiled and run Sage 3.2.3 on my T-Mobile G1 cell phone, and > large portions of it actually work. > [snip] Interesting, but how about a Sage *server* that one could access from an Android or iPhone? -- M. Edward (Ed) Borasky I've

[sage-devel] Re: Longest and most pointless Sage build ever?

2009-02-17 Thread Rob Beezer
Carl, Great story! I'd been looking for an excuse to get a G1. With Sage running, maybe I can deduct it as business expense. Rob On Feb 17, 7:52 pm, Carl Witty wrote: > I have compiled and run Sage 3.2.3 on my T-Mobile G1 cell phone, and > large portions of it actually work. > > 300 files ha

[sage-devel] Re: sage logo facelifting

2009-02-17 Thread Rob Beezer
The controversy between Debian and Mozilla might be germane to this discussion. If I understand it right, the name Firefox and the logos are trademarked by Mozilla. Debian's strict interpretation of open licenses mean they ship their patched version of Firefox as IceWeasel. Or maybe Mozilla won

[sage-devel] Longest and most pointless Sage build ever?

2009-02-17 Thread Carl Witty
I have compiled and run Sage 3.2.3 on my T-Mobile G1 cell phone, and large portions of it actually work. 300 files had failing doctests; this means that all doctests passed in 864 files. A lot of the failing doctests are with pexpect (maxima, gap, etc.); I don't know why these fail. When I try

[sage-devel] Re: pynac and vector-valued functions

2009-02-17 Thread William Stein
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 7:16 PM, Jason Grout wrote: > > I was tinkering around trying to get the following to work: > > f(x,y,z) = vector([x^2,y+z,x*y*z]) > > which defines a 3d vector field, or in general, some function from SR^n > to SR^m. However, it seems like extensive changes may be silly

[sage-devel] pynac and vector-valued functions

2009-02-17 Thread Jason Grout
I was tinkering around trying to get the following to work: f(x,y,z) = vector([x^2,y+z,x*y*z]) which defines a 3d vector field, or in general, some function from SR^n to SR^m. However, it seems like extensive changes may be silly to make now, given how much pynac is improving (and how soon it

[sage-devel] Re: sage logo facelifting

2009-02-17 Thread William Stein
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 3:45 AM, Robert Bradshaw wrote: > > On Feb 17, 2009, at 2:30 AM, Harald Schilly wrote: > >> On Feb 17, 3:07 am, Sirius wrote: >>> To be sincere, I really don't care much, nor know much, about the >>> license, I just want to have credit ... >> >> Yes, I don't care much eit

[sage-devel] Re: project web servers

2009-02-17 Thread William Stein
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 11:47 AM, Georg S. Weber wrote: > > > > On 17 Feb., 20:04, William Stein wrote: >> On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 9:02 AM, Timothy Clemans >> >> wrote: >> >> > planet.sagemath.org point's to William's homepage >> >> This should now be fixed. Let me know if you see any other pr

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.3.rc0 binary for MacIntel OSX 10.5

2009-02-17 Thread mark mcclure
On Feb 17, 3:13 pm, mabshoff wrote: > > One final comment: George's patch was unnecessary.  I > > hope I didn't send you on a wild goose chase. > > Nah, that was a real bug. > > I made thishttp://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/5295 Good. One other little issue remains. When Sage.app quits,

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.3.rc0 binary for MacIntel OSX 10.5

2009-02-17 Thread mabshoff
On Feb 17, 12:07 pm, mark mcclure wrote: Hi Mark, > I finally got Sage.app working.  Still there seems > something a bit odd about the fix.  I had, in my home > directory, a .maxima directory with a file named > maxima-init.mac that sets certain maxima preferences. > Once I deleted this file,

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.3.rc0 binary for MacIntel OSX 10.5

2009-02-17 Thread mark mcclure
I finally got Sage.app working. Still there seems something a bit odd about the fix. I had, in my home directory, a .maxima directory with a file named maxima-init.mac that sets certain maxima preferences. Once I deleted this file, everything worked fine. As I understand it though, the sage dir

[sage-devel] Re: project web servers

2009-02-17 Thread Georg S. Weber
On 17 Feb., 20:04, William Stein wrote: > On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 9:02 AM, Timothy Clemans > > wrote: > > > planet.sagemath.org point's to William's homepage > > This should now be fixed.  Let me know if you see any other problems. > > William Hi William, the link I used to access trac is cu

[sage-devel] Re: project web servers

2009-02-17 Thread Martin Albrecht
> Please check that it works now. > > http://m4ri.sagemath.org/ > > Also, please check that you can login to boxen.math and from there do > > ssh m...@sagemath > > so you can login to the m4ri account and edit the website. > You can add ssh keys for anybody else who should edit > the website.

[sage-devel] Re: project web servers

2009-02-17 Thread William Stein
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 9:02 AM, Timothy Clemans wrote: > > planet.sagemath.org point's to William's homepage This should now be fixed. Let me know if you see any other problems. William --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@goog

[sage-devel] Re: project web servers

2009-02-17 Thread William Stein
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 1:53 AM, Martin Albrecht wrote: > > On Tuesday 17 February 2009, William Stein wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I had to migrate all the cython, Sage and mpir websites and related >> servers to another machine, due to some hardware failures on the >> server that was hosting them.Pl

[sage-devel] Re: project web servers

2009-02-17 Thread mabshoff
On Feb 17, 9:02 am, Timothy Clemans wrote: > planet.sagemath.org point's to William's homepage Yep, Harald already mentioned that off-list yesterday and there was some talk to resurrect the planet with nicer skinning, etc. soon. Thanks for reporting it again :) Cheers, Michael --~--~---

[sage-devel] Re: project web servers

2009-02-17 Thread Timothy Clemans
planet.sagemath.org point's to William's homepage On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 4:53 AM, Martin Albrecht wrote: > > On Tuesday 17 February 2009, William Stein wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I had to migrate all the cython, Sage and mpir websites and related >> servers to another machine, due to some hardware fai

[sage-devel] Re: sage logo facelifting

2009-02-17 Thread Robert Bradshaw
On Feb 17, 2009, at 2:30 AM, Harald Schilly wrote: > On Feb 17, 3:07 am, Sirius wrote: >> To be sincere, I really don't care much, nor know much, about the >> license, I just want to have credit ... > > Yes, I don't care much either but here my two cents: My personal > "definition" of logo is a

[sage-devel] Re: sage logo facelifting

2009-02-17 Thread Harald Schilly
On Feb 17, 3:07 am, Sirius wrote: > To be sincere, I really don't care much, nor know much, about the > license, I just want to have credit ... Yes, I don't care much either but here my two cents: My personal "definition" of logo is a unique graphic to represent the project. Unique means, no oth

[sage-devel] Re: project web servers

2009-02-17 Thread Martin Albrecht
On Tuesday 17 February 2009, William Stein wrote: > Hi, > > I had to migrate all the cython, Sage and mpir websites and related > servers to another machine, due to some hardware failures on the > server that was hosting them.Please let me know if any of the > cython, Sage, or MPIR websites ar

[sage-devel] Re: Bug in FractionField

2009-02-17 Thread Robert Bradshaw
On Feb 16, 2009, at 6:21 PM, mabshoff wrote: > On Feb 16, 4:01 pm, Jason Bandlow wrote: >> Hello all, >> >> I reporting the following bug here because a) Trac is currently >> down and >> b) it's bad enough that I'd like to call attention to it. >> >> The following test was done in 3.3.rc0. >>