> So here's a proposal: Should Sage stop distributing a custom
> matplotlibrc, and ignore matplotlibrc files that already exist in the
> $DOT_SAGE directories?
I am +0, since I don't plot, but one could distribute a custom
matplotlibrc saying that it is no longer used and pointing to likely
l
I just finished upgrading the matplotlib spkg to the newest version.
See http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/4774
This version of matplotlib deprecates some of the constructs found in
Sage's matplotlibrc (which is located in $SAGE_ROOT and automatically
copied to $DOT_SAGE if needed ever
Em Dom, 2009-01-25 às 18:04 -0800, kcrisman escreveu:
>
> Will there be a sage.exe file (or something like that) that my
> students can download straight from sagemath.org and use right away on
> a Windows machine?
I believe this is the big point of the whole thread. Even though sage's
users cur
> There is a patch at
>
> http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/4976
>
> which adds this capability to the plot command.
> Maybe you can help test it.
>
As Fabio said earlier in this thread, it works very nicely for the
limited examples I can concoct, as well as for the very impressive-
look
Rob Beezer wrote:
> William,
>>
>> I think the right change for your application would be to change this
>> line in left_kernel:
>>
>> W = V.submodule(basis)
>>
>> to
>>
>> if echelonize:
>> W = V.submodule(basis)
>> else:
>> W = V.submodule_with_basis(basis)
>>
>
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 3:55 PM, Rob Beezer wrote:
>
> William,
>
> Thanks for the reply. I hadn't dug deep enough to find the
> "with_basis" variant of the submodule constructor, so I like the
> suggested approach. Barring anymore significant conversation here,
> I'll take on submitting this w
William,
Thanks for the reply. I hadn't dug deep enough to find the
"with_basis" variant of the submodule constructor, so I like the
suggested approach. Barring anymore significant conversation here,
I'll take on submitting this with a ticket and a patch. It'll be a
learning experience for me
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 3:07 PM, Rob Beezer wrote:
>
> A question about computing bases for kernels or null spaces of
> matrices.
>
> When working with students studying linear algebra for the first time,
> I like to construct basis vectors for the (right) kernel by working
> through the indices
A question about computing bases for kernels or null spaces of
matrices.
When working with students studying linear algebra for the first time,
I like to construct basis vectors for the (right) kernel by working
through the indices of the non-pivot columns of the reduced row
echelon form of the m
On Jan 28, 9:55 pm, Jason Grout wrote:
>Harald, did
> you do any work on this that you could post to a trac ticket or something?
No, i haven't. Just looked at openopt itself.
On Jan 28, 10:04 pm, William Stein wrote:
> I wonder if openopt isn't mature enough for Sage?
Well, as long as it has
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 1:32 PM, William Stein wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 10:29 AM, Alec Mihailovs wrote:
>>
>> Another alternative, for using Sage in class, instead of using a
>> (non-existing) native Windows port, or one of the virtualizations, is to use
>> it from a live CD, booting L
Jaap Spies wrote:
> Pat LeSmithe wrote:
>> Hello, Sage developers,
>>
>> In the interest of cross-fertilization, I'd like to mention VisIt [1]
>> and ParaView [2]. These are BSD-licensed parallel visualization
>> applications based partly on the Visualization Toolkit (VTK) [3].
[...]
>>
>> Anyway
On Jan 28, 8:32 am, Pat LeSmithe wrote:
...
> I think it'd be great to be able to "import sage" to access
> Sage's command-line capabilities inside VisIt and ParaView. Is this
> possible?
Sage ships with its own copy of Python, etc.; and it's only supported
to use Sage with its internal Python
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 1:04 PM, William Stein wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 12:55 PM, Jason Grout
> wrote:
>>
>> William Stein wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 12:06 PM, Jason Grout
>>> wrote:
Whatever happened to the possible spkg for openopt in Sage?
See:
https://gro
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 12:55 PM, Jason Grout
wrote:
>
> William Stein wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 12:06 PM, Jason Grout
>> wrote:
>>> Whatever happened to the possible spkg for openopt in Sage?
>>>
>>> See:
>>> https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel/browse_thread/thread/c5df7593c8696c
William Stein wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 12:06 PM, Jason Grout
> wrote:
>> Whatever happened to the possible spkg for openopt in Sage?
>>
>> See:
>> https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel/browse_thread/thread/c5df7593c8696c5f/7da6a11b6e8e85d3?#7da6a11b6e8e85d3
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Jason
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 12:06 PM, Jason Grout
wrote:
>
> Whatever happened to the possible spkg for openopt in Sage?
>
> See:
> https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel/browse_thread/thread/c5df7593c8696c5f/7da6a11b6e8e85d3?#7da6a11b6e8e85d3
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jason
Nobody decided to do any actua
Whatever happened to the possible spkg for openopt in Sage?
See:
https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel/browse_thread/thread/c5df7593c8696c5f/7da6a11b6e8e85d3?#7da6a11b6e8e85d3
Thanks,
Jason
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-d
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 11:07 AM, Carl Witty wrote:
>
> On Jan 28, 12:44 am, mhampton wrote:
>> Hi Sébastien,
>>
>> Let me first say I am glad you are working on and thinking about this.
>
> Me too.
>
> ...
>
>> I have gone back and forth about changing the coordinate
>> representation into some
On Jan 28, 12:44 am, mhampton wrote:
> Hi Sébastien,
>
> Let me first say I am glad you are working on and thinking about this.
Me too.
...
> I have gone back and forth about changing the coordinate
> representation into something more sophisticated. At first I had
> coordinates as vectors, b
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 10:29 AM, Alec Mihailovs wrote:
>
> Another alternative, for using Sage in class, instead of using a
> (non-existing) native Windows port, or one of the virtualizations, is to use
> it from a live CD, booting Linux. The CDs are easy to distribute in class,
> and students d
Another alternative, for using Sage in class, instead of using a
(non-existing) native Windows port, or one of the virtualizations, is to use
it from a live CD, booting Linux. The CDs are easy to distribute in class,
and students don't have to download and install anything.
Alec
--~--~-
Pat LeSmithe wrote:
>
> Hello, Sage developers,
>
> In the interest of cross-fertilization, I'd like to mention VisIt [1]
> and ParaView [2]. These are BSD-licensed parallel visualization
> applications based partly on the Visualization Toolkit (VTK) [3].
>
> [1] https://wci.llnl.gov/codes/vis
Hello, Sage developers,
In the interest of cross-fertilization, I'd like to mention VisIt [1]
and ParaView [2]. These are BSD-licensed parallel visualization
applications based partly on the Visualization Toolkit (VTK) [3].
[1] https://wci.llnl.gov/codes/visit/
http://visitusers.org/index.
Hi Sébastien,
Let me first say I am glad you are working on and thinking about this.
I guess I disagree somewhat with most of these ideas, but as the
author of most of the existing code I suppose that's to be expected.
I don't think converting between representations should be explicit;
however
25 matches
Mail list logo
