William Stein wrote:
> Cool!! Do they explain why Sage gets a relatively low rating, e.g.
> Scilab gets 9 but Sage 6? Is it because of the relative lack of our
> focus on numerics?
Not quite, although it must be noted that the primary focus of Will
Tribbey, the reviewer, was numerical computin
Craig Citro wrote:
>> Craig, why do you think it would be really nice anyway?
>>
>
> In general, I'd just like to be able to scroll something to the top of
> the browser window, even if it's the last cell I've created. I
> understand I can do this by making a bunch of empty cells, but that
> look
> Craig, why do you think it would be really nice anyway?
>
In general, I'd just like to be able to scroll something to the top of
the browser window, even if it's the last cell I've created. I
understand I can do this by making a bunch of empty cells, but that
looks *really* stupid. Also, if I'm
> By the way, I'm not quite sure what "SVD" and "FFT" refer to.
>
I'm guessing it's "Singular Value Decomposition" and "Fast Fourier Transform."
-cc
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this gr
Cool!! Do they explain why Sage gets a relatively low rating, e.g.
Scilab gets 9 but Sage 6? Is it because of the relative lack of our
focus on numerics?
On 10/24/08, Minh Nguyen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> This morning I received issue 109, September 2008, of "Linux Format"
>
Hi folks,
This morning I received issue 109, September 2008, of "Linux Format"
magazine (dead tree version). Down under in Australia, we do have to
wait quite some time for overseas magazines to arrive. And when they
appear on the news stand at my local magazines store, the "latest
issues" of Lin
Craig Citro wrote:
>> Could we just put a big chunk of blank space at the bottom of the worksheet?
>> I.e., just always make it so worksheets have a big blank space below them?
>> I think i wouldn't be opposed to this, and your conversation seemed to
>> suggest
>> it would work.
>>
>
> I think t
> Could we just put a big chunk of blank space at the bottom of the worksheet?
> I.e., just always make it so worksheets have a big blank space below them?
> I think i wouldn't be opposed to this, and your conversation seemed to suggest
> it would work.
>
I think this would be really nice, indepe
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 2:21 PM, Jason Grout
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Jason Grout wrote:
>> Jason Grout wrote:
>>> Jason Grout wrote:
From playing with putting alerts into the javascript code, the jump
seems to occur exactly when the innerHTML is replaced in set_output_text
j
Jason Grout wrote:
> Jason Grout wrote:
>> Jason Grout wrote:
>>> From playing with putting alerts into the javascript code, the jump
>>> seems to occur exactly when the innerHTML is replaced in set_output_text
>>> javascript function, in the following lines:
>>>
>>>
>>> if (new_intera
Hi,
On 24 Okt., 01:00, Willem Jan Palenstijn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 02:20:42PM -0700, Georg S. Weber wrote:
> > 3. Even the innocent line
>
> > sage: time for i in range(10): float(1)/2
>
> This seems to be caused by the _record_exception() function in the
> coerc
Jason Grout wrote:
> Jason Grout wrote:
>> From playing with putting alerts into the javascript code, the jump
>> seems to occur exactly when the innerHTML is replaced in set_output_text
>> javascript function, in the following lines:
>>
>>
>> if (new_interact_output.indexOf('__SAGE_IN
Jason Grout wrote:
> From playing with putting alerts into the javascript code, the jump
> seems to occur exactly when the innerHTML is replaced in set_output_text
> javascript function, in the following lines:
>
>
> if (new_interact_output.indexOf('__SAGE_INTERACT_RESTART__') !=
>
Harald Schilly wrote:
> On Oct 23, 3:14 am, Jason Grout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I notice that lots of times, when changing the value of a control in an
>> interact and the interact updates, the notebook automatically scrolls up
>> so that the interact is only partially shown. ...
>
> Hi, I
On Thursday 23 October 2008 18:36:33 Jason Grout wrote:
> Burcin Erocal wrote:
> > Yes, this would be helpful. I keep a todo list on a sticky note on my
> > desktop. Here is my list (more or less in order of priority):
> >
> > * evaluation
> > * support for _fast_eval
> > * hash is random
> > * py
Hi everybody,
(sorry for my late replies the university where the conference is at which I'm
attending blocks e-mail)
F4 does not require homogenization and only (IIRC) suggests to use the normal
selection strategy. Matrix-F5 (as described in literature) is quite different
from F4 because it
16 matches
Mail list logo
