2008/10/7 mhampton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Linearly increasing the lift values does not work. I can find a
> relatively small example (81 vertices in 4 dimensions) where your
> patch fails.
>
> For higher dimensions I think using lrs is really the way to go, since
> adding it has other advantages
Linearly increasing the lift values does not work. I can find a
relatively small example (81 vertices in 4 dimensions) where your
patch fails.
For higher dimensions I think using lrs is really the way to go, since
adding it has other advantages as well. When I have a little time I
will try to w
On Oct 7, 10:20 am, "Georg S. Weber" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hi,
Hi,
I have been away for a while, so I am late to pipe in here: The
decision to just plain out refuse to build with MacPorts and/or Fink
in path was the result of tracking down a large number of mysterious
build issues over
Hi,
a solution which "removes unwanted directories from the paths(s)"
would use something like (untested! I just googled
http://www.faqs.org/docs/abs/HTML/string-manipulation.html):
path_to_clean = "$PATH"
dylibpath_to_clean = "$DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH"
${path_to_clean//"/opt/local"*:/""}
${dylibpath
I think the best solution, if possible, is to re-adjust the paths to
remove macports/fink to build. However, as a short term solution,
rather than just killing the build, maybe it should be a prompt
warning the user that it might be a problem, and asking if they want
to continue anyways. I
Hi
Sorry I've been unable to participate in the discussion, and I
unfortunately won't get any time to look at for a while (we're moving
city and jobs) so I won't say much because I won't be doing much for a
couple of months.
Really, my only concern is that sage compiles out of the box for
