[sage-devel] Re: polytopes, triangulation, proposal to add lrs

2008-09-22 Thread Arnaud Bergeron
My code is up for review at #4164 Arnaud --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sag

[sage-devel] Re: cygwin demo

2008-09-22 Thread mabshoff
On Sep 22, 6:17 pm, Jason Grout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm really curious how the cygwin demo today went.  Any reports? No demo, since I did not fix the libSingular import problem, i.e. when the GMP allocator gets hooked we segfault. Various work arounds that worked with 3-0-4-2 on OSX 10

[sage-devel] cygwin demo

2008-09-22 Thread Jason Grout
I'm really curious how the cygwin demo today went. Any reports? Thanks, Jason --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this gro

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.1.3.alpha0 released

2008-09-22 Thread William Stein
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 6:11 PM, Craig Citro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi John, > >> That is not in itself slow: >> sage: time pp=pari.primes_up_to_n(10^8) >> CPU times: user 0.69 s, sys: 0.30 s, total: 1.00 s >> Wall time: 1.00 s >> >> However note that >> >> sage: time pp=prime_range(10^8)

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.1.3.alpha0 released

2008-09-22 Thread Craig Citro
Hi John, > That is not in itself slow: > sage: time pp=pari.primes_up_to_n(10^8) > CPU times: user 0.69 s, sys: 0.30 s, total: 1.00 s > Wall time: 1.00 s > > However note that > > sage: time pp=prime_range(10^8) > CPU times: user 143.74 s, sys: 1.51 s, total: 145.26 s > Wall time: 145.93 s > > wi

[sage-devel] Re: how to make tut and ref

2008-09-22 Thread mabshoff
On Sep 21, 2:58 am, CristianCantoro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I tried to build the documentation but I get this error: Hi Cristian, > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/sage/sage-3.1.1/devel/doc$ make tut > Previously I've got other errors but I fixed them searching some > missing files (manual.cls, py

[sage-devel] Re: ATLAS compilation failure with SAGE 3.1.2

2008-09-22 Thread mabshoff
On Sep 22, 12:56 pm, bourbabis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello everybody. Hi Bourbabis > You can find the log file here > :http://download227.mediafire.com/2mdxp9won3ng/z0tx2wyjamj/install.log... gcc died with an "internal compiler error". The gcc you used is known good, i.e I have used i

[sage-devel] Re: Sage in url prefix

2008-09-22 Thread Jason Grout
Pavel Panchekha wrote: > So, any luck in having this implemented? > In a quick look through the 3.1.2 source, it looks like the headers are being generated in lots of different places for different pages. I think tclemans is redoing a lot of the html to be based on templates. Timothy, how ea

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.1.3.alpha0 released

2008-09-22 Thread John Cremona
2008/9/22 Georg S. Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > On 22 Sep., 22:17, "John Cremona" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> 2008/9/22 Georg S. Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> >> >> >> >> >> > On 22 Sep., 10:39, "John Cremona" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> 2008/9/21 Georg S. Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.1.3.alpha0 released

2008-09-22 Thread Georg S. Weber
On 22 Sep., 22:17, "John Cremona" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2008/9/22 Georg S. Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > > > On 22 Sep., 10:39, "John Cremona" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> 2008/9/21 Georg S. Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > >> > Hi John, > > >> > On 21 Sep., 21:16, "John Cremona"

[sage-devel] Re: Sage in url prefix

2008-09-22 Thread Pavel Panchekha
So, any luck in having this implemented? On Sep 19, 6:59 pm, Pavel Panchekha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes, as far as I know, all do. > > http://reference.sitepoint.com/html/base > > Its a great unknown and underused tag. Of course, the right solution > is relative links. But that's often to h

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.1.3.alpha0 released

2008-09-22 Thread John Cremona
2008/9/22 Georg S. Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > On 22 Sep., 10:39, "John Cremona" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> 2008/9/21 Georg S. Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> >> >> >> >> >> > Hi John, >> >> > On 21 Sep., 21:16, "John Cremona" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> The long test in ell_finite_fi

[sage-devel] ATLAS compilation failure with SAGE 3.1.2

2008-09-22 Thread bourbabis
Hello everybody. You can find the log file here : http://download227.mediafire.com/2mdxp9won3ng/z0tx2wyjamj/install.log.bz2 Thanks. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.1.3.alpha0 released

2008-09-22 Thread Georg S. Weber
On 22 Sep., 10:39, "John Cremona" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2008/9/21 Georg S. Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > > > Hi John, > > > On 21 Sep., 21:16, "John Cremona" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> The long test in ell_finite_field.py  which causes problems on this > >> platform is this: >

[sage-devel] Re: status of Sage for Debian?

2008-09-22 Thread mabshoff
On Sep 22, 7:59 am, Tim Abbott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > One more thing: With polybori-0.5 you need to link the extension > > pbori.pyx statically since otherwise you get a segfault at exit. I am > > not sure if the PolyBoRi are aware of that problem (they fixed a > > similar issue for us

[sage-devel] Re: status of Sage for Debian?

2008-09-22 Thread Martin Albrecht
On Monday 22 September 2008, Tim Abbott wrote: > > Ok, note that we are updating LinBox and Givaro in 3.1.3 due to some > > bugs as well as build issues. > > Okay, I'll be sure to update them before I go past 3.1.2. > > I should probably do the work for a 3.1.2 update to avoid being far > behind o

[sage-devel] Re: status of Sage for Debian?

2008-09-22 Thread Tim Abbott
> Ok, note that we are updating LinBox and Givaro in 3.1.3 due to some > bugs as well as build issues. Okay, I'll be sure to update them before I go past 3.1.2. I should probably do the work for a 3.1.2 update to avoid being far behind once the review process finishes. It seems that 3.1.2 has a

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.1.3.alpha0 released

2008-09-22 Thread John Cremona
2008/9/21 Georg S. Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Hi John, > > On 21 Sep., 21:16, "John Cremona" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> The long test in ell_finite_field.py which causes problems on this >> platform is this: >> sage: E = EllipticCurve('389a') >> sage: for p in prime