On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 6:39 PM, John Voight <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> I'd like to keep the Sage notebook open and running for my students on
> a server machine, but when I do it immediately hogs all 4GB of
> memory! (Even after I kill the notebook and quit sage, according to
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 5:13 PM, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Aug 28, 2:54 pm, Jason Grout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > The Python extension is linked against nauty object files, and gcc
> > > complains these should be compiled with the flag "-fPIC" to make
> > > relocatable code.
It is indeed weird! I'm not really sure what's going on. I think the
simplest thing to do right now is just to run the notebook on a
different machine, since I want to reserve this machine for my
research anyway. (For the record, I was running 64 bit Ubuntu.)
Thanks all, JV
--~--~-~--~
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 4:59 PM, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The Python extension is linked against nauty object files, and gcc
> complains
> > these should be compiled with the flag "-fPIC" to make relocatable code.
> > nauty does not have this flag normally, so I modified the makefil
Hi Harald,
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 9:33 AM, Harald Schilly
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
>> I'll keep you updated on
>> this tutorial in the next few weeks.
>
> great! also linking to pari, R and other tutorials from the sage
> documentation page is a good idea if someone wants to understand t
On Aug 28, 4:34 pm, Simon Beaumont <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well any python code fails to work as expected:
>
> try: sage-python -c "import sys"
> File "", line 1
> import
> ^
> SyntaxError: invalid syntax
>
> ... -c "print;print" # will print two line feeds however
>
> this came
Hi David,
There appears to be a broken link at
http://wiki.sagemath.org/Teaching_with_SAGE
for "Calculus 1". The "broken" link is
[1] http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/wdj/teaching/granville-calculus/
However, at the URL
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/wdj/teaching/
I notice that yo
I have pycuda working on OSX 10.5.2 with the standard framework based
python and nv CUDA 2.0... now for the hacks!
Not at all sure about the right direction for this CUDA stuff yet.
Simon
On Aug 29, 12:29 am, Simon Beaumont <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Aug 28, 11:22 pm, David Philp <[EMAIL P
On 29/08/2008, at 9:29 AM, Simon Beaumont wrote:
> On Aug 28, 11:22 pm, David Philp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On 29/08/2008, at 7:56 AM, mabshoff wrote:
>>
>>> David Philip has been playing with building PyCuDA against Sage's
>>> Python on OSX.
>>
>> No!!! I'd love to do it but I haven't go
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 11:04 AM, David Ketcheson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> For now I have resorted to simply manipulating strings for what I
> want, which is simply to be able to do symbolic algebra with matrices
> and vectors. I may be interested in developing this functionality
> myself f
Well any python code fails to work as expected:
try: sage-python -c "import sys"
File "", line 1
import
^
SyntaxError: invalid syntax
... -c "print;print" # will print two line feeds however
this came up when trying to configure boost for sage, wherein
configure has:
$PYTHON -c "
On Aug 28, 11:22 pm, David Philp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 29/08/2008, at 7:56 AM, mabshoff wrote:
>
> > David Philip has been playing with building PyCuDA against Sage's
> > Python on OSX.
>
> No!!! I'd love to do it but I haven't got time for CUDA. I've been
> using boost.python, for
Hello folks,
September 1st is around the corner and we wanted to hit 60% coverage
by the end of August. The current coverage in my alpha2 merge tree is
Overall weighted coverage score: 57.2%
Total number of functions: 20912
and Mike Hansen is writing doctests for all the expect interfaces
On 29/08/2008, at 7:56 AM, mabshoff wrote:
> David Philip has been playing with building PyCuDA against Sage's
> Python on OSX.
No!!! I'd love to do it but I haven't got time for CUDA. I've been
using boost.python, for the sake of /other/ C++ code of mine. I
originally tried to sort of bo
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 11:58 PM, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Aug 28, 1:18 pm, Jaap Spies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> mabshoff wrote:
>>
>> > On Aug 28, 9:18 am, Jaap Spies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> > Hi Jaap,
>>
>> > I guess sailing season this year is coming to an end
On Aug 28, 2:54 pm, Jason Grout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
> Stephen Hartke wrote:
> > I've added my Python binding for nauty into Jason Grout's optional nauty
> > spkg. (Jason: I hope that's okay. Since the extension needs to include
> > nauty and link against it, it seems simplest to in
On Aug 28, 1:20 pm, "Stephen Hartke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Stephen,
> I've added my Python binding for nauty into Jason Grout's optional nauty
> spkg. (Jason: I hope that's okay. Since the extension needs to include
> nauty and link against it, it seems simplest to include it in one pac
On Aug 28, 1:18 pm, Jaap Spies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> mabshoff wrote:
>
> > On Aug 28, 9:18 am, Jaap Spies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi Jaap,
>
> > I guess sailing season this year is coming to an end :)
>
> Not yet! I'll go on until the end of October. BUt there have been some
> p
On Aug 28, 2:32 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 1:19 PM, Simon Beaumont <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
> > got a rather weird one - os x 10.5.2 sage 3.1.1 (binary build) I am
> > trying to build boost (python) for this version on os x - so I can get
> >
Stephen Hartke wrote:
> I've added my Python binding for nauty into Jason Grout's optional nauty
> spkg. (Jason: I hope that's okay. Since the extension needs to include
> nauty and link against it, it seems simplest to include it in one
> package.) It can be downloaded at
> http://www.math.un
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 1:19 PM, Simon Beaumont <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> got a rather weird one - os x 10.5.2 sage 3.1.1 (binary build) I am
> trying to build boost (python) for this version on os x - so I can get
> pycuda going against the OS X 2.0 cuda.
>
> well the python (python-sage) se
Hi Carl,
On Aug 28, 10:15 pm, Carl Witty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It would probably have been better to start a new thread in sage-
> support.
OK, I will remember for the next time, thanks.
> The difference I see between the fast and slow cases is whether av is
> a string or a symbolic obj
Hi Minh, David, et al.,
Feel free to link or copy these notes. My "old" address in Sydney
should remain valid
for at least the next 2 years, as I have an official honorary position
there, but the notes
may change, so a link would probably be preferable. Eventually I will
to mirror my web
page (a
I've added my Python binding for nauty into Jason Grout's optional nauty
spkg. (Jason: I hope that's okay. Since the extension needs to include
nauty and link against it, it seems simplest to include it in one package.)
It can be downloaded at
http://www.math.unl.edu/~shartke2/files/nauty-24b7.spk
got a rather weird one - os x 10.5.2 sage 3.1.1 (binary build) I am
trying to build boost (python) for this version on os x - so I can get
pycuda going against the OS X 2.0 cuda.
well the python (python-sage) seems not to handle the -c "command"
like regular python that is "import" fails with a s
mabshoff wrote:
>
>
> On Aug 28, 9:18 am, Jaap Spies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi Jaap,
>
> I guess sailing season this year is coming to an end :)
>
Not yet! I'll go on until the end of October. BUt there have been some problems
:-(
The engine broke down. For four weeks I'm waiting fo
On Aug 28, 1:52 am, Stan Schymanski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am not sure if this is the appropriate place to ask this question,
> but I'll do it anyway:
It would probably have been better to start a new thread in sage-
support.
> Why is "var._fast_float_(const)" so much slower than
> fast_
On Aug 28, 8:17 am, mhampton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Aug 28, 8:45 am, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Another way to make animation for a web browser would be
> > to use javascript, though the timing might look jerky. Another
> > possibility is flash.
>
> I am very ignorant
On Aug 28, 6:30 am, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 10:22 PM, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Yeah, the above looks odd. Maybe William can tell us what is happening
> > here.
>
> I think the above is just numerical noise. The Viterbi algorithm
> i
On Aug 28, 9:18 am, Jaap Spies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Jaap,
I guess sailing season this year is coming to an end :)
> On Fedora 9, 32 bits:
>
> --
> The following tests failed:
I assume:
> sage -t devel/sage
On Aug 28, 9:24 am, "Arnaud Bergeron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/8/28 mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
Hi Arnaud,
> > Thanks for tracking this down. Please open a new ticket and attach the
> > patch to it.
>
> > We generally attempt to avoid reopening tickets or adding patches to
> > t
2008/8/28 Robert Bradshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>
>> Maybe someone who understands coercion can tell me how to get
>> around this?
>
> You need to implement _lmul_ and make sure the basering is Z.
I have implemented _lmul_ already, I don't know exactly what you mean
about the basering, but I tr
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 10:54 PM, David Ketcheson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Thanks for the nice fix. I've managed to break things in a new way:
>
> sage: from sympy import Symbol
> sage: x,y=Symbol('x',False),Symbol('y',False)
> sage: 1/2+y*x
> x*y + 1/2
> sage: y*x+1/2
> 1/2 + y*x
> <<
For now I have resorted to simply manipulating strings for what I
want, which is simply to be able to do symbolic algebra with matrices
and vectors. I may be interested in developing this functionality
myself for Sage. What is the plan for symbolic algebra in sage? Will
'var's eventually do eve
Alfredo Portes wrote:
> Hi Jason,
>
> On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 12:32 PM, Jason Grout
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I downloaded it to try it. It looks very nice. However, on my Thinkpad
>> A31, the numlock is activated and I can't deactivate it. This means
>> that I lose about half of the
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 9:54 AM, Robert Bradshaw
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Aug 27, 2008, at 1:54 PM, David Ketcheson wrote:
>
>>
>> Thanks for the nice fix. I've managed to break things in a new way:
>>
>
>> sage: from sympy import Symbol
>> sage: x,y=Symbol('x',False),Symbol('y',Fals
On Aug 27, 2008, at 1:19 PM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
>
> On Wed, 27 Aug 2008, Craig Citro wrote:
>
>>
Thoughts?
>>>
>>> I vote for fast.
>>>
>>
>> I also vote for fast -- but couldn't there be a flag for the slow
>> option? Maybe "consistent=True" or something, in case someone really
>> wants
On Aug 28, 2008, at 6:20 AM, John Cremona wrote:
>
> Thanks for your comments, David. I am having some success:
>
> sage: A = AbelianGroup([2,3])
> sage: A.list()
> [1, f1, f1^2, f0, f0*f1, f0*f1^2]
> sage: A = AbelianGroup([2,3],operation='+')
> sage: A.list()
> [0, f1, 2*f1, f0, f0+f1, f0+2*f1
On Aug 27, 2008, at 1:54 PM, David Ketcheson wrote:
>
> Thanks for the nice fix. I've managed to break things in a new way:
>
> sage: from sympy import Symbol
> sage: x,y=Symbol('x',False),Symbol('y',False)
> sage: 1/2+y*x
> x*y + 1/2
> sage: y*x+1/2
> 1/2 + y*x
> <<<
>
> The 'False' argume
Alfredo Portes wrote:
> Thank you David for the feedback.
>
> The LiveCD is open to many more customizations (including making
> it smaller). So please, anything they think it should be changed, let
> me know.
Another thing: when I'm not connected to the network, firefox starts in
offline mode
Hi Jason,
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 12:32 PM, Jason Grout
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I downloaded it to try it. It looks very nice. However, on my Thinkpad
> A31, the numlock is activated and I can't deactivate it. This means
> that I lose about half of the keyboard because the numeric keypad
David Joyner wrote:
> My students are finding this very useful. Thank you Alfredo!
>
>
I downloaded it to try it. It looks very nice. However, on my Thinkpad
A31, the numlock is activated and I can't deactivate it. This means
that I lose about half of the keyboard because the numeric keypa
2008/8/28 mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Thanks for tracking this down. Please open a new ticket and attach the
> patch to it.
>
> We generally attempt to avoid reopening tickets or adding patches to
> tickets that were closed in previous milestones since that makes
> reconstructing the exact s
mabshoff wrote:
> Hello folks,
>
> alpha1 is finally out. I don't think alpha0 was ever announced here,
> so I am posting both logs. We merged loads of patches, but especially
> plotting improvements. Besides that we finally upgraded numpy and
> matplotlib, so some things might be going wrong the
2008/8/28 Jason Grout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Arnaud Bergeron wrote:
>> There is a strong possibility that for the next semester I will be
>> working on the graphics area of sage. I would working more on the
>> visible side than the innards but that does not mean I will not touch
>> the innards
Arnaud Bergeron wrote:
> There is a strong possibility that for the next semester I will be
> working on the graphics area of sage. I would working more on the
> visible side than the innards but that does not mean I will not touch
> the innards if need be.
>
> Currently I have these items that
John Cremona wrote:
> Thanks for the suggestion. But it does not work for me. Even though
> b.__rmul__(2) works , as do b.__mul__(2) and b.__lmul__(2) and b*2,
> 2*b still gives the error: non of my own mul functions are getting
> seen, it goes straight for the default which fails.
>
> I just
Thank you David for the feedback.
The LiveCD is open to many more customizations (including making
it smaller). So please, anything they think it should be changed, let
me know.
Are your students using the Vmware option also?
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 10:05 AM, David Joyner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wr
On Aug 28, 8:45 am, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 1) Better triangulations for many-vertex faces. You either have to
> > work around the current behavior of indexed_face_set or change it. I
> > have been trying to do the former in polyhedra.py, since then it only
> > impacts th
> >> Another way to make animation for a web browser would be
> >> to use javascript, though the timing might look jerky. Another
> >> possibility is flash.
> >
> > That would be for 2D animations right?
>
> Yes, that's what I had in mind. It could also be used for 3d if
> you generate a sequenc
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 8:01 AM, Arnaud Bergeron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> 2008/8/28 William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 5:06 AM, mhampton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>> There are a number of things I am sort of working on but I lack the
>>> time to do them in
2008/8/28 William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 5:06 AM, mhampton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> There are a number of things I am sort of working on but I lack the
>> time to do them in the near future.
>>
>> 1) Better triangulations for many-vertex faces. You either h
Thanks for the suggestion. But it does not work for me. Even though
b.__rmul__(2) works , as do b.__mul__(2) and b.__lmul__(2) and b*2,
2*b still gives the error: non of my own mul functions are getting
seen, it goes straight for the default which fails.
I just discovered that int(2)*b does wo
My students are finding this very useful. Thank you Alfredo!
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 12:25 AM, Alfredo Portes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Here is a LiveCD (Ubuntu based) of 3.1.1, if anybody
> wants to try it. A vmware image that runs the livecd
> is included.
>
> http://sage.math.washington.
That's great, thanks a lot!
Stan
Martin Albrecht wrote:
>> Could you give an example of how to convert a list (e.g. [1,2,3,4]) to a
>> vector (e.g. (1,2,3,4) and back again? That would help me a lot.
>>
>
> sage: l = [1,2,3,4]
> sage: v = vector(ZZ,l); v
> (1, 2, 3, 4)
> sage: list(v) # lis
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 5:06 AM, mhampton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> There are a number of things I am sort of working on but I lack the
> time to do them in the near future.
>
> 1) Better triangulations for many-vertex faces. You either have to
> work around the current behavior of indexed_f
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 9:20 AM, John Cremona <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Thanks for your comments, David. I am having some success:
>
> sage: A = AbelianGroup([2,3])
> sage: A.list()
> [1, f1, f1^2, f0, f0*f1, f0*f1^2]
> sage: A = AbelianGroup([2,3],operation='+')
> sage: A.list()
> [0, f1, 2
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 10:22 PM, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Aug 27, 8:57 am, "John Cremona" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Two build reports. Both built fine, but a few doctest failures:
>
> Hi John,
>
>> 1. Linux version 2.6.24-19-generic ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version
>>
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 2:53 PM, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Aug 28, 5:17 am, "Ondrej Certik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> Trying:
>> >>
>> >> G.show(frame_aspect_ratio=[Integer(1),Integer(1),Integer(1)/Integer(2)])###
>> >> line
>> >> 893:_sage_>>> G.show(frame_as
Thanks for your comments, David. I am having some success:
sage: A = AbelianGroup([2,3])
sage: A.list()
[1, f1, f1^2, f0, f0*f1, f0*f1^2]
sage: A = AbelianGroup([2,3],operation='+')
sage: A.list()
[0, f1, 2*f1, f0, f0+f1, f0+2*f1]
sage: A = AbelianGroup([2,3], names='ab')
sage: A.list()
[1, b,
On Aug 28, 5:17 am, "Ondrej Certik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Trying:
> >>
> >> G.show(frame_aspect_ratio=[Integer(1),Integer(1),Integer(1)/Integer(2)])###
> >> line
> >> 893:_sage_ >>> G.show(frame_aspect_ratio=[1,1,1/2])
> >> Expecting nothing
>
> >> after maybe a minute. Imho 1
Hello folks,
fortunately the number of ticket with unreviewed patches has dropped
from 100+ to around 40 at the moment. But if you look at
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/report/10
there are still 41 open tickets with patches waiting for review. So if
you have some spare cycles to burn co
Since no one has emailed intelligent comments yet, I'll add my own
not-so-intelligent but hopefully encouraging ones below:-)
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 3:18 PM, John Cremona <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Currently in Sage, AbelianGroups are all multiplicative. There's a
> TODO in abelian_groups.p
>> Trying:
>>
>> G.show(frame_aspect_ratio=[Integer(1),Integer(1),Integer(1)/Integer(2)])###
>> line
>> 893:_sage_>>> G.show(frame_aspect_ratio=[1,1,1/2])
>> Expecting nothing
>>
>> after maybe a minute. Imho 1 minute for one test is way too much.
>
> buhu :) - there are more than enough
There are a number of things I am sort of working on but I lack the
time to do them in the near future.
1) Better triangulations for many-vertex faces. You either have to
work around the current behavior of indexed_face_set or change it. I
have been trying to do the former in polyhedra.py, sinc
On Aug 28, 4:59 am, "Ondrej Certik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 1:33 PM, David Joyner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
> > --
> > The following tests failed:
>
> > sage -t devel/sage/sage/calcul
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 1:33 PM, David Joyner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 8:42 AM, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Hello folks,
>>
>> alpha1 is finally out. I don't think alpha0 was ever announced here,
>> so I am posting both logs. We merged loads of patches,
> Could you give an example of how to convert a list (e.g. [1,2,3,4]) to a
> vector (e.g. (1,2,3,4) and back again? That would help me a lot.
sage: l = [1,2,3,4]
sage: v = vector(ZZ,l); v
(1, 2, 3, 4)
sage: list(v) # list of ZZs
[1, 2, 3, 4]
sage: map(int, list(v)) # list of ints
[1, 2, 3, 4]
Ch
Hi John,
Thanks a lot for your help.
John Cremona wrote:
> If you want to do mathematical operations such as scalar
> multiplcation, convert to a vector.
> (You could also do [2*i for i in range(3)], but I don't think you like
> that construction.)
>
Could you give an example of how to conver
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 11:49 PM, Arnaud Bergeron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> There is a strong possibility that for the next semester I will be
> working on the graphics area of sage. I would working more on the
> visible side than the innards but that does not mean I will not touch
> the inn
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 8:42 AM, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello folks,
>
> alpha1 is finally out. I don't think alpha0 was ever announced here,
> so I am posting both logs. We merged loads of patches, but especially
> plotting improvements. Besides that we finally upgraded numpy and
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 1:39 AM, Minh Nguyen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi group,
>
> At the URL
>
> http://wiki.sagemath.org/Teaching_with_SAGE
>
> the first dot point _appears_ to give a link to David Kohel's notes on
> cryptography. The link is
>
> http://www.sagemath.org/pub/crypto.pdf
T
There are two separate things going on here.
I think this is a bug:
sage: vector(range(3))
TypeError: unable to find a common ring for all elements
since this does work:
sage: vector(srange(3))
(0, 1, 2)
The difference is that the elements of range(3) are python ints while
the elements of sran
I am not sure if this is the appropriate place to ask this question,
but I'll do it anyway:
Why is "var._fast_float_(const)" so much slower than
fast_float(var,'const')?
Example without giving the long definition of the variable 'long':
%time
longfast=long.subs(locals())._fast_float_(av)
gives
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 8:10 AM, Minh Nguyen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[..]
> nv2d
>
> link --> http://web.mit.edu/bshi/Public/nv2d/
> "file not found"
new URL: http://ostatic.com/110007-software-opensource/nv2d
> GTL
> ---
> Graphlet --> http://ceu.fi.udc.es/SAL/E/2/GRAPHLET.html
> "Not
I used to use gp2c when I used gp a lot (which has been for many
years, less now that Sage is around). The advantages over C are like
the advantages of cython over python: put in a very small amount of
extra work, and have both the ease of writing of an interpreted
language and the speed of a co
Hi group,
I've went through (hopefully) all of the links at
http://wiki.sagemath.org/graph_survey
and have found that some links on that wiki page are out of date.
Below are the specific links that returned something like "file not
found" etc. Each underlined name is a section name describing s
77 matches
Mail list logo
