Uh, I don't know what you are complaining about
the GAP to Mathematica could widen?
I work heavily on exactly that goal!!!
- increasing the distance to their Gröbner bases implementations ;-).
I would make myself ridiculous, if I would do benchmarks against it.
Just for conformity, I enter the
Harald Schilly wrote:
> On Jul 13, 10:50�pm, saucerful <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I was interested in seeing the performance differences between MATLAB
> > and some open source offerings so I googled and came across this:
> > http://www.sciviews.org/benchmark/index.html
> I have seen this be
Hi...
This doesn't seem to be the hottest topic of all time.
More below.
On 12/07/2008, at 12:16 AM, mabshoff wrote:
> On Jul 10, 11:23 pm, David Philp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi David,
>
>> R does not work inside sage if LD_LIBRARY_PATH includes /sw/lib.
>> (Which it ordinarily wouldn
On 14/07/2008, at 8:06 AM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
> On Jul 13, 10:42 pm, Harald Schilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> You forget one point (for me the probably biggest one) - the
>> community. Especially around matlab you have a wide range of "open
>> source" (public domain, do what you want.
On Jul 13, 3:24 pm, "Dr. David Kirkby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Jul 13, 8:00 pm, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
> > solaris express and it blew up on pari.
>
> > It really depends on the toolchain on Solaris and as is a gcc
> > configured with the Sun ld will not work for vario
On Jul 13, 8:00 pm, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> solaris express and it blew up on pari.
>
> It really depends on the toolchain on Solaris and as is a gcc
> configured with the Sun ld will not work for various reasons beyond
> Pari.
I've just built 4.3.1 with binutils 2.18. I will see ho
On Jul 13, 10:42 pm, Harald Schilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You forget one point (for me the probably biggest one) - the
> community. Especially around matlab you have a wide range of "open
> source" (public domain, do what you want. ..) code on the web, spread
> over many websites. So, if y
On Jul 13, 10:50 pm, saucerful <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was interested in seeing the performance differences between MATLAB
> and some open source offerings so I googled and came across
> this:http://www.sciviews.org/benchmark/index.html
>
I have seen this benchmark, it's outdated and i th
I see. Yes I agree it should be false. Consider:
CIF(RIF(0)) != CIF(RIF(-1, 1))
True
RIF(0, 0) != RIF(-1, 1)
False
That these two comparisons should be different makes no sense, does
it?
Also why is it that CIF(0) seems to not have an interval, while CIF(1)
does?
On Jul 13, 4:35 pm, Nick Al
I was interested in seeing the performance differences between MATLAB
and some open source offerings so I googled and came across this:
http://www.sciviews.org/benchmark/index.html
It seems like MATLAB did not have a huge edge in performance over R
when the test was done, but that Octave was far
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 6:08 PM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Will the book be available online, or do I need to save the copy now?
>
> Save your copy now! I signed the contract with springer 8 years ago
> before I worried about things like making books freely available online.
On 13-Jul-08, at 12:17 PM, saucerful wrote:
>
> Some weird behavior in ComplexIntervalField:
>
>
CIF(-1, 1) isn't what you think it is:
sage: CIF(-1, 1)
[-1. .. -1.] + [1. ..
1.]*I
You meant:
sage: CIF(RIF(-1, 1))
[-1.
Hi Nils,
Your message sent to my old email address in Nottingham, or I would
have replied sooner ;)
I'm forwarding the reply to sage-devel.
No, it is not my code. The only problem is that the function calls
E.lseries().L_ratio(), and L_ratio() calls misc.verbose() without
importing the misc mo
Some weird behavior in ComplexIntervalField:
CIF(0) != CIF(-1, 1);
This should be false (as the value 0 is contained in both intervals),
but it returns true (using whatever version is on sagenb.org).
A little deeper:
print CIF(0);
0
print CIF(1);
[1. .. 1.0
On Jul 13, 3:51 am, François Bissey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
Hi François,
> Recently David Kirkby tried to compile sage on
> solaris express and it blew up on pari.
It really depends on the toolchain on Solaris and as is a gcc
configured with the Sun ld will not work for various rea
I'm running OS X 10.4 and the warning about DT_TEXTREL doesn't appear
in my install log.
Good luck!
David
On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 3:51 AM, François Bissey
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Recently David Kirkby tried to compile sage on
> solaris express and it blew up on pari. Turns out
On Jul 13, 12:54 am, mhampton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I can assure you that many mathematicians use mathematica in thier
> research; I used to.
That was my impression too, although I am not a mathmatician. I have
worked with people who have used Mathematica for serious maths
research. Lik
Hi all,
Recently David Kirkby tried to compile sage on
solaris express and it blew up on pari. Turns out
the pari shared library is build without any PIC
flag and that caused his linker to just give up.
Turns out that the problem is in fact widespread
across a number of archs where the linker e
18 matches
Mail list logo
