[sage-devel] R / Aqua / CoreFoundation / Mac OS X

R does not work inside sage if LD_LIBRARY_PATH includes /sw/lib. (Which it ordinarily wouldn't, that was a mistake of mine.) That bug is pretty trivial and easily fixed. But I found that R is the only component of sage that links to system frameworks. (Aside from python.) That seems to

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.0.4 released

Hi, built using Arch Linux (32 bit, gcc 4.3.1) and build went fine... there are some test results, other than that it works fine cheers, Andrzej. devel/sage/sage/plot/tachyon.py 19618 Naruszenie ochrony pamięci tachyon /root/.sage//temp/ginland/ 19542//tmp_12.dat -format PNG -o /root/.sage//

[sage-devel] Re: Help on pyprocessing - Multicore CPU Usage Problem

Michael, If you're doing everything on a local mutli-core machine (i.e. shared memory), you should probably be using pyprocessing at the momement. If you're going to be using a cluster of some sort, then dsage is the way to go. Cheers, Yi http://yiqiang.org On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 3:59 AM, Mich

[sage-devel] Re: Notebook feature request

On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 8:45 AM, saucerful <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Along the same lines, another nice thing would be keyboard shortcuts. > The most important being "Interrupt" The escape key is a shortcut for this. > and "Evaluate all." Of course, > we don't want to turn the web browser

[sage-devel] Re: Notebook feature request

Along the same lines, another nice thing would be keyboard shortcuts. The most important being "Interrupt" and "Evaluate all." Of course, we don't want to turn the web browser into an IDE but I think this is within reason. Perhaps these even exist, as shift+enter evaluates the current cell (this

[sage-devel] Re: VMware 3.0.4

On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 8:03 AM, Caecos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Don't forgot the poors of us who used Windows and need a VMware > version of the latest release... > > A thousand thanks, Thanks for the reminder. I actually can't update the vmware machine until I'm in my office in Seattle,

[sage-devel] VMware 3.0.4

Don't forgot the poors of us who used Windows and need a VMware version of the latest release... A thousand thanks, Marc --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PR

[sage-devel] Re: 3.0.4 fails on Solaris (SPARC) - broken NTL patch ?

On Jul 10, 12:27 pm, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Jul 10, 4:15 am, François Bissey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Yup none of the patch for Solaris have been applied yet so this expected, > > use the spkg from your test machine. > I assumed it had been patched - I must admit it tot

[sage-devel] Re: 3.0.4 fails on Solaris x86 - perhaps need GNU linker ??

On Jul 10, 4:34 am, François Bissey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 10 Jul 2008, Dr. David Kirkby wrote: > > I tried to build sage 3.0.4 on my laptop (Solaris Express Community > > Edition snv_91 X86), but it fails when building pari. It looks from a > > search of the web, that the error ge

[sage-devel] Re: 3.0.4 fails on Solaris x86 - perhaps need GNU linker ??

On Thu, 10 Jul 2008, Dr. David Kirkby wrote: > I tried to build sage 3.0.4 on my laptop (Solaris Express Community > Edition snv_91 X86), but it fails when building pari. It looks from a > search of the web, that the error generated: > > "ld: fatal: relocations remain against allocatable but non-w

[sage-devel] Re: 3.0.4 fails on Solaris x86 - perhaps need GNU linker ??

On Jul 10, 3:20 am, "Dr. David Kirkby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I tried to build sage 3.0.4 on my laptop (Solaris Express Community > Edition snv_91 X86), but it fails when building pari. It looks from a > search of the web, that the error generated: > > "ld: fatal: relocations remain agains

[sage-devel] Re: 3.0.4 fails on Solaris (SPARC) - broken NTL patch ?

On Jul 10, 4:15 am, François Bissey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 10 Jul 2008, François Bissey wrote: > > On Thu, 10 Jul 2008, Dr. David Kirkby wrote: > > > I've tried to build Sage 3.0.4 on my Sun Blade 2000 (Solaris 10 8/07 > > > s10s_u4wos_12b SPARC). It fails when building ntl, report

[sage-devel] Re: 3.0.4 fails on Solaris (SPARC) - broken NTL patch ?

On Thu, 10 Jul 2008, François Bissey wrote: > On Thu, 10 Jul 2008, Dr. David Kirkby wrote: > > I've tried to build Sage 3.0.4 on my Sun Blade 2000 (Solaris 10 8/07 > > s10s_u4wos_12b SPARC). It fails when building ntl, reporting: > > > > ../include/NTL/ctools.h:6:27: NTL/mach_desc.h: No such file

[sage-devel] Re: 3.0.4 fails on Solaris (SPARC) - broken NTL patch ?

On Thu, 10 Jul 2008, Dr. David Kirkby wrote: > I've tried to build Sage 3.0.4 on my Sun Blade 2000 (Solaris 10 8/07 > s10s_u4wos_12b SPARC). It fails when building ntl, reporting: > > ../include/NTL/ctools.h:6:27: NTL/mach_desc.h: No such file or > directory > > Looking at the sage tree, I note th

[sage-devel] Re: Help on pyprocessing - Multicore CPU Usage Problem

Yes your right, factoring integers was only a simple example to make my point. Actually I'm working together with a fellow student (Tobias Nagel) on the project "Computing integral points on elliptic curves" (as diploma thesis supervised by Stefan Mueller-Stach (Uni-Mainz, Germany)). We just finis

[sage-devel] 3.0.4 fails on Solaris (SPARC) - broken NTL patch ?

I've tried to build Sage 3.0.4 on my Sun Blade 2000 (Solaris 10 8/07 s10s_u4wos_12b SPARC). It fails when building ntl, reporting: ../include/NTL/ctools.h:6:27: NTL/mach_desc.h: No such file or directory Looking at the sage tree, I note that mach_desc.h does not exists. $ find sage-3.0.4 -name

[sage-devel] Re: sagemath.org relaunch

Harald, thank you very much for this detailed report. I found it quite interesting. Cheers, Martin -- name: Martin Albrecht _pgp: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x8EF0DC99 _www: http://www.informatik.uni-bremen.de/~malb _jab: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --~--~-~--~~

[sage-devel] 3.0.4 fails on Solaris x86 - perhaps need GNU linker ??

I tried to build sage 3.0.4 on my laptop (Solaris Express Community Edition snv_91 X86), but it fails when building pari. It looks from a search of the web, that the error generated: "ld: fatal: relocations remain against allocatable but non-writable sections" might be a result of using the Sun

[sage-devel] Bookshelf of standard object behaviors and datastructures

Dear Sage developers, Summary of this rather long e-mail which builds up on section "2.9 Mutability" of the programming guide. - In MuPAD, the memory behavior (and up to some point the data structure) of objects is essentially forced. This relieves the programmer of tedious memory

[sage-devel] Re: Py_UNICODE_SIZE on OS X

On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 9:04 PM, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Jul 9, 8:18 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 8:11 PM, David Philp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > >> > This is a 'for the record' email describing how to use boost.python >> > wi

[sage-devel] Re: how to handle assumptions

Robert, >> >> view the pdf file for "Schaums 14.120-14.124" (schaum5.input.pdf) >> See the result on page 3 of the pdf. >> >> The first integral result returned by Axiom is a list of answers. > >Hmm. I don't see any indication of the domain i