On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 10:21 PM, Ondrej Certik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 2:29 AM, François Bissey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, 09 Jul 2008, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>>> The only remaining annoying thing is this one LD_LIBRARY_PATH thing.
>>> I'll probably put it t
>>> Also part of the problem is that the assume system in Maxima
>>> is not very strong, and it has bugs. We could use some help on
>>> that too.
>>
>> What are your ideas to handle assumptions correctly?
>>
>> E.g. from your slides you prefer the formula and all the symbols to be
>> just symbols
Hi,
Robert wrote:
> Also part of the problem is that the assume system in Maxima
> is not very strong, and it has bugs. We could use some help on
> that too.
What are your ideas to handle assumptions correctly?
E.g. from your slides you prefer the formula and all the symbols to be
just symbols
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 10:27 PM, Ondrej Certik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Robert wrote:
>
>> Also part of the problem is that the assume system in Maxima
>> is not very strong, and it has bugs. We could use some help on
>> that too.
>
> What are your ideas to handle assumptions correct
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 10:21 PM, Ondrej Certik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 2:29 AM, François Bissey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, 09 Jul 2008, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>>> The only remaining annoying thing is this one LD_LIBRARY_PATH thing.
>>> I'll probably put it t
On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 2:29 AM, François Bissey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 09 Jul 2008, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>> The only remaining annoying thing is this one LD_LIBRARY_PATH thing.
>> I'll probably put it to my .bashrc, as there doesn't seem to be any
>> way around it.
>>
> It's probabl
William Stein wrote:
> It would likely be possible -- though difficult (maybe not too difficult) --
> to have Sage automatically give all possible answers to Maxima and
> construct a conditional integral expression that gives each possible
> answer for given conditions.
My preference for handlin
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 12:12 PM, David Joyner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi:
> The bugs in the constructions document pop up every once in awhile on
> the email lists. My understanding was that it would be replaced by a
> "cookbook",
> which covered a superset of the material but had chapters
-- Forwarded message --
From: Elliott Brossard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 4:39 PM
Subject: Re: working on Sage
To: William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Here are the tests that currently succeed, some of which I've written
and some of which are from Maxima/Wester. I
On Wed, 09 Jul 2008, Ondrej Certik wrote:
> The only remaining annoying thing is this one LD_LIBRARY_PATH thing.
> I'll probably put it to my .bashrc, as there doesn't seem to be any
> way around it.
>
It's probably better to make a small launcher script setting the variable
correctly. I have seen
Hi,
thanks to Michael, Garry and Mike I figured out how to run Sage in a
regular python:
http://wiki.sagemath.org/Sage_in_systemwide_python
turns out it's actually really simple, the only unconvenient way is
that you need to start the python interpreter with:
$ LD_LIBRARY_PATH="/home/ondra/ext
On Jul 8, 3:24 pm, "Dr. David Kirkby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8 Jul, 03:16, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hello folks,
>
> > Sage 3.0.4.rc0 is out. We merged only bug fixes and hope that this
> > will be identical to the final release. This time we have a source
> > tarball a
On 8 Jul, 03:16, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello folks,
>
> Sage 3.0.4.rc0 is out. We merged only bug fixes and hope that this
> will be identical to the final release. This time we have a source
> tarball at
>
> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/was/tmp/sage-3.0.4.rc0.tar
On Sol
Hi Dan,
You're right, this is a bug in the Laurent polynomial ring. The
underlying cause of the problem is this:
sage: P. = LaurentPolynomialRing(QQ)
sage: qi = q^(-1)
sage: qi in P
False
sage: q in P
True
sage: P(qi)
---
The following appears to me to be a bug. Shouldn't q^(-1) be
in this Laurent polynomial ring?
Dan
sage: P. = LaurentPolynomialRing(QQ)
sage: type(q),type(q^(-1))
(,
)
sage: q in P
True
sage: q^(-1) in P
False
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send e
Built fine on OS 10.4, intel, but the dsage test failed.
sage -t devel/sage/sage/dsage/interface/dsage_interface.py
**
File "/Users/mh/sage-3.0.4.rc0/tmp/dsage_interface.py", line 461:
sage: d.is_connected()
Expected:
T
Hi:
The bugs in the constructions document pop up every once in awhile on
the email lists. My understanding was that it would be replaced by a
"cookbook",
which covered a superset of the material but had chapters written (or
co-written) by
different experts.
I have a chapter draft (co-written with
Nils,
This doesn't appear to be a problem with coercion. When you multiply
a*a
you're calling the _mul_ attribute. In your code, you write it as _mult_.
Delete the t and it works.
Cheers,
Nathan
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 11:15 AM, Nils Skoruppa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Could
On 8-Jul-08, at 9:36 AM, ibrahim wrote:
>
> I don't know anything about python.
If you know nothing about Python, I think you will have a very
difficult time wrapping C++ code using Cython and Sage.
> As they said than Sage is a python interpreter,
> I just try to load the file into Sage dire
This is now http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/3612
--Mike
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 12:42 PM, Nick Alexander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On 8-Jul-08, at 10:08 AM, saucerful wrote:
>>
>> Is it possible to put links in the trackback messages that refer to
>> lines in the current noteook
On 8-Jul-08, at 10:08 AM, saucerful wrote:
>
> Is it possible to put links in the trackback messages that refer to
> lines in the current noteook (as opposed to stuff in the sage or
> python libraries) so that you can jump to that line? I have found
> that the code that it spits out is usually v
Builds fine and all tests passed on amd64 hardy heron, phenom chip.
On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 10:16 PM, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello folks,
>
> Sage 3.0.4.rc0 is out. We merged only bug fixes and hope that this
> will be identical to the final release. This time we have a source
>
Hello,
It looks like this is happening since the __contains__ for
RealIntervalField isn't working properly. See below:
ipdb> x
[3.999562 .. 4.000466]
ipdb> x.parent()
Real Interval Field with 32 bits of precision
ipdb> self.base_ring()
Real Interval Field with 32 bits of precision
ipdb>
Is it possible to put links in the trackback messages that refer to
lines in the current noteook (as opposed to stuff in the sage or
python libraries) so that you can jump to that line? I have found
that the code that it spits out is usually very ambiguous (and there
are no line numbers, another
I don't know anything about python.
As they said than Sage is a python interpreter,
I just try to load the file into Sage directly.
When I try to import it into python, I have a syntax error:
>>> import "~/.sage/rectangle/setup.pyx"
File "", line 1
import "~/.sage/rectangle/setup.pyx"
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 7:02 AM, mhampton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I only had 1 failure on OS X 10.4, intel:
>
> sage -t devel/sage/sage/finance/time_series.pyx
>
> probably a known issue.
Yep. It's 1 digit being off?
Thanks,
William
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
On Jul 8, 2008, at 8:32 AM, ibrahim wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I'm trying to make an integration of existing C++ code by cython and
> I can't find in the Sage manual how to do so using Cython.
>
> I tried an example from the wiki.cython explaining
> how to translate a C++ code to Cython code
> - tr
Yes, you are correct that the cpp code in those directories is auto-
generated. NTL, givaro, libsingular, linbox, etc. are shared c++
libraries (see the corresponding spkg) that are then linked to from
the code in /libs.
It's probably easier to first understand wrapping c code before
embar
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 12:52 AM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 9:12 PM, Elliott Brossard
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi William,
>>
>> I am becoming more familiar with both Linux and Sage now, which makes things
>> much easier. I finished porting the Maxim
There is no exemple of wrapping a c++ code there is no any c or c++
source code.
The c++ files are generated by sage for all teses cases.
On Jun 26, 5:52 am, Robert Bradshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Interfaces is the way to go if you're trying to wrap a cmd line
> executable. If you're
Hello!
I'm trying to make an integration of existing C++ code by cython and
I can't find in the Sage manual how to do so using Cython.
I tried an example from the wiki.cython explaining
how to translate a C++ code to Cython code
- translation of C header into a .pyx file
- writing the
mabshoff wrote:
> Hello folks,
>
> Sage 3.0.4.rc0 is out. We merged only bug fixes and hope that this
> will be identical to the final release. This time we have a source
> tarball at
>
> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/was/tmp/sage-3.0.4.rc0.tar
>
> There might or might not be a sage.math
Hi all,
Could anybody point me to a link to understand the coercion model of
sage.
... or, if anybody is willing to have a look at my problem:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sage
--
| SAGE Version 3.0.3, Release Date: 2008-06-17
2008/7/8 John Cremona <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Build ok and all tests passed here:
>
> Linux version 2.6.18.8-0.3-default ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version
> 4.1.2 20061115 (prerelease) (SUSE Linux)) #1 SMP Tue Apr 17 08:42:35
> UTC 2007
>
> John
By the way, I asked this before but the answer was to
I only had 1 failure on OS X 10.4, intel:
sage -t devel/sage/sage/finance/time_series.pyx
probably a known issue.
-M. Hampton
On Jul 7, 9:19 pm, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jul 7, 8:58 am, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Build report:
>
> > * the pickles from
Build ok and all tests passed here:
Linux version 2.6.18.8-0.3-default ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version
4.1.2 20061115 (prerelease) (SUSE Linux)) #1 SMP Tue Apr 17 08:42:35
UTC 2007
John
2008/7/8 mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Hello folks,
>
> Sage 3.0.4.rc0 is out. We merged only bug fixes
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 8:52 AM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 9:12 PM, Elliott Brossard
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi William,
>>
>> I am becoming more familiar with both Linux and Sage now, which makes things
>> much easier. I finished porting the Maxima
>> sage: integrate(log(x)/a, x)
>> ---
>> NameError Traceback (most recent call last)
>>
>> /home/gfurnish/sage-3.0.3/ in ()
>>
>> NameError: name 'integrate' is not defined
>
> Sorry, I used a
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 1:26 PM, Ondrej Certik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 8:52 AM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 9:12 PM, Elliott Brossard
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Hi William,
>>>
>>> I am becoming more familiar with both Lin
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 8:52 AM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 9:12 PM, Elliott Brossard
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi William,
>>
>> I am becoming more familiar with both Linux and Sage now, which makes things
>> much easier. I finished porting the Maxima
40 matches
Mail list logo
