Hi Max,
the patch you suggested has been cleaned up, reviewed and applied.
Since you contributed to Sage we will add you to
http://lite.sagemath.org/developer-map.html
if you are interested. Feel free to contact me off list for the
details.
Cheers,
Michael
--~--~-~--~~
Hi,
I'm giving a plenary talk at ISSAC in Linz, Austria this summer. I'm supposed
to write a 2-page "abstract/paper" for the proceedings. I just wrote something:
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/was/tmp/abstract.pdf
I've been advised by some people on this list to focus on algorithms i
On Apr 30, 3:40 am, M <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > If you could provide a patch it would make
> > fixing this even faster ;). We are now tracking this at
Hi Max,
> >http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/3061
>
> Great response speed! And welcoming too! Whoopee. Don't worry, it
> won't l
>
> If you could provide a patch it would make
> fixing this even faster ;). We are now tracking this at
>
> http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/3061
>
Great response speed! And welcoming too! Whoopee. Don't worry, it
won't last. I have another ticket for you. :-)
Here's the patch. C
On Apr 30, 2:06 am, M <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear All,
Hi Max,
> I just tried making a symlink to sage and it broke because it defaults
> to using $0 to work out where SAGE_DIR is. I'd like to propose a
> small change that allows symlinks to be used:
>
> ---
> THE
Dear All,
I just tried making a symlink to sage and it broke because it defaults
to using $0 to work out where SAGE_DIR is. I'd like to propose a
small change that allows symlinks to be used:
---
THE FILE: is the shell script called sage in the root of the install
tree a
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 1:19 AM, mabshoff
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Apr 29, 10:16 am, Harald Schilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Apr 29, 5:43 am, Joshua Kantor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi Harald,
>
>
> > > Do you guys think it might be wise to temporarily change the
>
On Apr 30, 3:03 am, Bill Hart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Paul Zimmermann commented to me that he doubts qd has proofs of
> correctness associated with it, as mpfr does.
>
> The main advantage of qd is that it is a fixed precision package,
> which is faster than multiprecision but subject to over
On Apr 29, 4:59 pm, "Jason Martin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> The symbolic link
>
> /home/was/www/sage/pre
>
> points to a non-existent referrent, which causes rsync on my mirror to
> skip file deletion (I'm using the "safe" mode for link following in
> rsync)... which is making my mirror at l
Paul Zimmermann commented to me that he doubts qd has proofs of
correctness associated with it, as mpfr does.
The main advantage of qd is that it is a fixed precision package,
which is faster than multiprecision but subject to overflow if not
used correctly.
If a port of mpfr were created to be
The symbolic link
/home/was/www/sage/pre
points to a non-existent referrent, which causes rsync on my mirror to
skip file deletion (I'm using the "safe" mode for link following in
rsync)... which is making my mirror at least grow a little faster than
it should.
Can this sym link be removed?
--
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 1:46 AM, mabshoff
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Apr 29, 10:33 am, Francois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Hi Francois,
>
>
> > > Once you get some answer from upstream please open a ticket. I find it
> > > odd that the defaults are this way to say the least.
>
On Apr 29, 10:33 am, Francois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Francois,
> > Once you get some answer from upstream please open a ticket. I find it
> > odd that the defaults are this way to say the least.
>
> I did email the author about the precision here is what he has to say:
>
> For ieee-add,
On Apr 29, 12:16 pm, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
dortmund.de> wrote:
> On Apr 29, 1:54 am, Francois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Apr 29, 11:33 am, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Hi Francois,
>
> > Hi Michael,
>
> > The latest upstream release has the same default.
>
> Ok.
>
> >I try to get
On Apr 29, 10:16 am, Harald Schilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Apr 29, 5:43 am, Joshua Kantor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Harald,
> > Do you guys think it might be wise to temporarily change the
> > banner to mention this. I had never heard of inotebook.
>
> I've uploaded an Ubuntu 8.04
On Apr 29, 5:43 am, Joshua Kantor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Do you guys think it might be wise to temporarily change the
> banner to mention this. I had never heard of inotebook.
I've uploaded an Ubuntu 8.04/intel 32bit binary where the banner
simply says inotebook().
(Readme alone would not w
Jon's vision of lattices would include the ones I mentioned before
(f.g. but not necessarily free R-modules where R is a Dedekind Domain,
with one or more embeddings into RR^n or CC^n).
In another direction: Jon, to what extent could your quadratic form
class be extended to binary forms of higher
17 matches
Mail list logo
