Hi, Hichael,
On Mar 25, 2008, at 19:16 , mabshoff wrote:
>
> On Mar 26, 2:58 am, "Justin C. Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Mar 22, 2008, at 16:02 , mabshoff wrote:
>>> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/release-cycles-2.11/sag
>>> ...
>>
>> Things didn't go so well on my sys
Should I uninstall atlas if I want to check your patch for the future
version? Atlas is installed system wide on my computer, and linbox seemed to
have found those libraries as it compiled afterward. Is there a way to force
linbox to compile against the local version?
Cheers,
Soroosh
On Tue, Mar
Hello folks,
it seems that things have slowed down a little in Sage devel land due
to Easter and/or Spring Break. But there are still plenty of patches
in trac that deserve to be looked at and merged. While no hard date
has been set for the 2.11 release we should start winding down the
merges and
On Tue, 25 Mar 2008, Gary Furnish wrote:
>
> Trac #2436 adds the following algorithms from glib to libcsage:
> Multiplatform threads
> Thread pools
> Asynchronous Queues
> Memory Slices
> Doubly and Singly linked lists
> Queues
> Sequences
> Hash Tables
> Arrays
> Balanced Binary Trees
> N-ary
On Mar 26, 2:58 am, "Justin C. Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mar 22, 2008, at 16:02 , mabshoff wrote:
>
>
>
> > Hi folks,
>
> > Sage 2.11.alpha1 is out. It is a collection of various
> > fixes, nothing particular seems to stand out. We finally
> > pushed the updated experimental mayavi
On Mar 26, 1:12 am, Gary Furnish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Trac #2436 adds the following algorithms from glib to libcsage:
> Multiplatform threads
> Thread pools
> Asynchronous Queues
> Memory Slices
> Doubly and Singly linked lists
> Queues
> Sequences
> Hash Tables
> Arrays
> Balanced Binar
On Mar 22, 2008, at 16:02 , mabshoff wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> Sage 2.11.alpha1 is out. It is a collection of various
> fixes, nothing particular seems to stand out. We finally
> pushed the updated experimental mayavi and vtl.spkg.
>
> We still have the doctest failure in plot.py. I do not
> quite
On Mar 25, 9:42 pm, "Soroosh Yazdani" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> compiling fails for me on linbox. Apparently it can't find blas libraries.
> My computer is an hp laptop, with amd 64x2 processor, running gentoo. I have
> acml installed on my computer, although looking at install.log it
Trac #2436 adds the following algorithms from glib to libcsage:
Multiplatform threads
Thread pools
Asynchronous Queues
Memory Slices
Doubly and Singly linked lists
Queues
Sequences
Hash Tables
Arrays
Balanced Binary Trees
N-ary Trees
Quarks
In particular it features a slab memory allocator based
That's good -- I wrote to Larry pointing out that his algorithm for
point-counting on elliptic curves over finite fields was a bit
misleading, which we have discovered on sage-devel when someone
implemented it and found that it did not work as advertised. So in
the new edition he corrects that an
William Stein wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 12:53 PM, Jason Grout
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
>> When applying the patch for a overhauled matrix() function at
>> http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/2651, I get doctest failures
>> in crypto/mq/sr.py and sage/plot/plot3d/transform
Hi,
compiling fails for me on linbox. Apparently it can't find blas libraries.
My computer is an hp laptop, with amd 64x2 processor, running gentoo. I have
acml installed on my computer, although looking at install.log it seems like
sage is compiling atlas libraries as well, so I'm not sure if tha
Nick Alexander wrote:
>> if msg = "negative number cannot be raised to a fractional power" :
>> print "In Sage, even odd fractional powers of negative numbers yield
>> complex roots"
>
> I am opposed to printing anything from the Sage library, because I
> don't want to have to interact with i
> if msg = "negative number cannot be raised to a fractional power" :
> print "In Sage, even odd fractional powers of negative numbers yield
> complex roots"
I am opposed to printing anything from the Sage library, because I
don't want to have to interact with it in any way, including ignorin
Regarding Jason's recent patch allowing
sage: plot(x^(1/3),-1,1)
to still output a plot where it makes sense in Sage, I wonder whether
the following might also be useful in the _call() method of plot.py,
at around line 3620:
if msg = "negative number cannot be raised to a fractional power" :
Dear Clement
On Mar 25, 6:31 am, Clement Pernet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I still did not look at the code of Meat axe, but I remember having been
> really impressed a presentation at MSRI last year about MeatAxe.
> The timings were really impressive especially the matmul ones.
> So I am reall
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 7:28 AM, Ondrej Certik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 8:37 PM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > If you're a student and interested in working on the Sage notebook all
> > summer, there is now a link from
> >
>
On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 8:37 PM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> If you're a student and interested in working on the Sage notebook all
> summer, there is now a link from
>
>http://wiki.python.org/moin/SummerOfCode
>
> to a Sage Notebook Google Summer of Code project,
Dear William,
On Mon, 24 Mar 2008, William Stein wrote:
> I would much prefer speeding up Sage matrices rather than incorporating
> MTX into Sage, since the result will in the former case will be much
> easier for users to understand and lots of other codes benefits.
Sure. As a user, i wouldn'
19 matches
Mail list logo
