[sage-devel] Re: 2.10.2 upgrade compilation error with R

2008-03-10 Thread mhampton
Updating my XCode package, so gcc is now 4.0.1 build 5370, fixed the problem. Thanks. sage-2.10.3.rc2 seems to have compiled OK. I had compiled OK with R in sage before, so presumably that got upgraded at some point - ? M. Hampton On Feb 27, 7:02 am, mhampton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > OK,

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 2.10.3.rc3 released

2008-03-10 Thread mabshoff
On Mar 10, 12:06 am, Francois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Since they are still in that rc I should mention a couple of typos > that > I spotted in two spkg. Hi Francois, > In linbox in the spkg-install file on line 41 we have an interesting > reference to ${SAGE_LCOAL}. This is now #2458 and

[sage-devel] Re: Bring back the XOR

2008-03-10 Thread David Roe
Note that the function that is called by "^" is __xor__. So you can already do a.__xor__(b). If you want to write the function that David describes, calling a.__xor__(b) is better than using eval. David On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 6:34 AM, David Joyner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Another solutio

[sage-devel] Re: symbolic logic code

2008-03-10 Thread Michael Brickenstein
Hi! You might want to look for the zeroesIn method to the new section "Reinterpretation of Boolean sets as subsets of the vector space" in the PolyBoRi tutorial. http://polybori.sourceforge.net/doc/tutorial/index.html Best regards, Michael On 7 Mrz., 10:14, Chris Gorecki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote

[sage-devel] Re: Bring back the XOR

2008-03-10 Thread David Joyner
Another solution (avoiding the preparer) is to simply define sage: def xor(a,b): return eval("%s^%s"%(a,b)) : sage: xor(1,0) 1 sage: xor(1,1) 0 which mimics the native Python behavior: Python 2.5.1 (r251:54863, Oct 5 2007, 13:50:07) [GCC 4.1.3 20070929 (prerelease) (Ubuntu 4.1.2-16ubuntu2

[sage-devel] Re: Bring back the XOR

2008-03-10 Thread Stephen Forrest
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 6:30 AM, vgermrk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Since the preparser replaces "^" with "**" (which is good!), > i want a way to access the python-buildin-XOR again. > > I suggested in IRC that the preparser should also replace "xor" with > "^", > so that one can do "5 xor

[sage-devel] Re: Color palettes

2008-03-10 Thread David Joyner
Cool! On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 9:48 PM, Hector Villafuerte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > in a moment of procrastination I came up with this: > https://www.sagenb.org/home/pub/1728/ > > Hopefully somebody can put this banality to good use within SAGE :) > Best, > -- > Hector > > > >

[sage-devel] Bring back the XOR

2008-03-10 Thread vgermrk
Since the preparser replaces "^" with "**" (which is good!), i want a way to access the python-buildin-XOR again. I suggested in IRC that the preparser should also replace "xor" with "^", so that one can do "5 xor 3". But since i did not convince everybody (on IRC), let's discuss here about it

[sage-devel] Re: A question of method...

2008-03-10 Thread Philippe Saade
On 3/10/08, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 3:05 PM, Philippe Saade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > First he would guess that "vector" might be the command to > create a vector, and type vector? into Sage, which would > yield about 20 examples and extensive