On Nov 18, 2007 6:06 PM, Ted Kosan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> William wrote:
>
> > The top article on slashdot *right now* is about "Open Source Math
> > Software" and my opinion piece
> > in the Notices of the AMS:
> >
> > http://science.slashdot.org/science/07/11/18/1341232.shtml
>
> Some
William wrote:
> The top article on slashdot *right now* is about "Open Source Math
> Software" and my opinion piece
> in the Notices of the AMS:
>
> http://science.slashdot.org/science/07/11/18/1341232.shtml
Sometime later this week, could you please let us know how much the
web traffic to
I opened tickets for the doctest failures:
#1202: sqlite-3.5.2.p1.spkg segfaults sage/databases/database.py
#1203: 2.8.13.alpha0: flint doctest failures
#1204: libs/cremona/constructor.py doctest failures
You should comment on the ticket or pop into irc if you plan to work
on a ticket.
Cheers,
I didn't see any mention in this thread that the article has been
posted on Slashdot!
http://science.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/11/18/1341232
On Nov 18, 2007 2:53 PM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Nov 18, 2007 3:49 PM, root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > One possible other
alpha0 took ages longer than planned and I mostly blame this on the
fact that
I build 2.8.12 from source seven or eight times for various reasons.
It is a
long story, let's just leave it at that. So far alpha0 contains mostly
updated
spkgs and the spelling fixes by Paul and one modular symbols fix
On Nov 18, 2007 3:49 PM, root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> One possible other source for funding is NIST (although the year that
> I thought to apply they only had funding for prior project, no new
> money available).
>
> An outstanding problem is that we have many different computer algebra
> and
On Nov 18, 2007 12:59 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> David Joyner and William Stein published an opinion piece in the
> AMS Notices raising (yet again) the issue of mathematical results
> that depend on closed source symbolic mathematics. They would like
> to see open source efforts funded.
> <
I just noticed this as well. This is good because of /.'s large
programmer audience.
On Nov 18, 11:37 am, "Mike Hansen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I just noticed that there is an article on the front page of slashdot
> about William and David's AMS opinion piece
> athttp://scien
Hello all,
I just noticed that there is an article on the front page of slashdot
about William and David's AMS opinion piece at
http://science.slashdot.org/science/07/11/18/1341232.shtml . I think
it'd be a good venue to get some Sage publicity in.
--Mike
--~--~-~--~~~-
Hi,
The top article on slashdot *right now* is about "Open Source Math
Software" and my opinion piece
in the Notices of the AMS:
http://science.slashdot.org/science/07/11/18/1341232.shtml
William
--
William Stein
Associate Professor of Mathematics
University of Washington
http://wstein.o
On Nov 18, 3:02 pm, "Ondrej Certik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > * the new scipy.spkg does not build on sage.math in case you compile
> > 2.8.12 from scratch. If you take the 2.8.12 binary from sage.math it
> > does work. You are required to build the new numpy first, though. I
> > tried fixin
On Nov 18, 2007, at 8:49 AM, Martin Albrecht wrote:
>
> On Sunday 18 November 2007, David Harvey wrote:
>> On Nov 18, 2007, at 4:16 AM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
#1130
>>>
>>> This seems to rely on an earlier patch. (#1120?) See comments on
>>> trac.
>>
>> I'm very concerned about this patch
> * the new scipy.spkg does not build on sage.math in case you compile
> 2.8.12 from scratch. If you take the 2.8.12 binary from sage.math it
> does work. You are required to build the new numpy first, though. I
> tried fixing this, but after 8 hours I have given up. Once the new
> scipy failed ev
On Sunday 18 November 2007, David Harvey wrote:
> On Nov 18, 2007, at 4:16 AM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
> >> #1130
> >
> > This seems to rely on an earlier patch. (#1120?) See comments on trac.
>
> I'm very concerned about this patch. It is not the case that the LCM
> of the orders of all elements o
A short status update:
* the new scipy.spkg does not build on sage.math in case you compile
2.8.12 from scratch. If you take the 2.8.12 binary from sage.math it
does work. You are required to build the new numpy first, though. I
tried fixing this, but after 8 hours I have given up. Once the new
s
On Nov 18, 2007, at 4:16 AM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
>> #1130
>
> This seems to rely on an earlier patch. (#1120?) See comments on trac.
I'm very concerned about this patch. It is not the case that the LCM
of the orders of all elements of E(GF(q)) will equal the order of E(GF
(q)). I haven't
On Nov 17, 2007 6:29 PM, Jason Grout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> I've been thinking about how to implement interactive widgets in the
> notebook. Things like sliders, buttons, etc., that allow interactivity
> like Maplets in Maple or the Manipulate command in Mathematica 6.
> > > 1) Expose as much Maxima functionality as possible (one example is
> > > substitution of other things besides symbols).
>
> We've definitely laid the foundations for that step very very well.
Yes, nice work.
> > > 2) It's important to allow users to create their own functions and the
> > >
Here's some comments. (Sorry for taking all the low-hanging fruit...)
- Robert
On Nov 17, 2007, at 10:03 PM, mabshoff wrote:
> Ok, various people have gone over track and commented on tickets.
>
> But the following patches need reviews:
>
> #1107
Minkowski bound...I heard about that somewher
19 matches
Mail list logo
