My idea was actually the second one, so nothing has to be changed in
current sage packages.I don't see this as so painfull (as the
Debian is currently doing something similar for debian packages
(actually for each Debian package there are 3 sources files:
a .dsc file, with description and checksu
Replying to my own message:
> Calculating the permanent of a 13 x 17 matrix with a 'band' of 4 1's
> over the main diagonal.
>
>
> Over ZZ:
>> sage: time f(13,4)
>> CPU times: user 3.98 s, sys: 0.07 s, total: 4.05 s
>> Wall time: 4.08
>> 1596800
>
With a cython function generating the combin
Successfully upgraded to 2.8.8.1 on linux (Kubuntu 7.04):
sage --testall
(...)
All tests passed!
Total time for all tests: 1978.6 seconds
John Cremona
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from thi
William Stein wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've released sage-2.8.8. Get it at http://sagemath.org, as usual,
> or just do "sage -upgrade".
>
Another test failure in the upgraded sage-2.8.8.1 below
Jaap
[EMAIL PROTECTED] sage]# sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/numerical/test.py
sage -t devel/sage-mai
On Oct 21, 10:36 am, "Justin C. Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I see the same problem as others have reported, but I have no
> optional packages installed. If I run 'gap_console()', and then
> 'LoadPackage("hap");', I get 'failed' as output.
Yes, that's as expected. For 2.8.8, William (ac
On 10/21/07, Justin C. Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > gap> LoadPackage("hap");
> > Loading HAP 1.7.5gamma ...
> > true
> > gap> PolynomialRing(Rationals,2);
> > PolynomialRing(..., [ x, x_2 ])
>
> I see the same problem as others have reported, but I have no
> optional packages installed.
On Oct 21, 2007, at 10:04 AM, William Stein wrote:
>
> I think I know what's going on.
>
> If you install the Gap optional packages, then reset the
> workspace you get the behavior I see. If you don't install
> the optional packages you don't. Thus one of the packages
> changes the print behav
William Stein wrote:
> I think I know what's going on.
>
> If you install the Gap optional packages, then reset the
> workspace you get the behavior I see. If you don't install
> the optional packages you don't. Thus one of the packages
> changes the print behavior of Gap.
>
> Indeed, here it
On 10/21/07, Pablo De Napoli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm currently working on ticket #329
>
> My idea is adding to each .spkg file a .spkg.md5 file with the md5checksum
> This should prevent file corruption.
Are you literally "adding to each .spkg file". If so,
make sure this is completel
I think I know what's going on.
If you install the Gap optional packages, then reset the
workspace you get the behavior I see. If you don't install
the optional packages you don't. Thus one of the packages
changes the print behavior of Gap.
Indeed, here it is:
gap> LoadPackage("hap");
Loading
William Stein wrote:
> On 10/21/07, Jaap Spies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> There seems to be some typos in the test of gap.py
>
> These are not typos. The behavior of gap-4.4.10 changed from that
> of gap-4.4.9, and the doctests reflect that change. Evidently for
> some reason your gap didn'
On Oct 21, 9:34 am, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/21/07, Jaap Spies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > There seems to be some typos in the test of gap.py
>
> These are not typos. The behavior of gap-4.4.10 changed from that
> of gap-4.4.9, and the doctests reflect that change. E
On 10/21/07, Jaap Spies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> William Stein wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I've released sage-2.8.8. Get it at http://sagemath.org, as usual,
> > or just do "sage -upgrade".
> >
>
> There seems to be some typos in the test of gap.py
These are not typos. The behavior of gap-4.4
On Oct 21, 5:30 am, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Carl: Paul has some suggestions for changing how real numbers
> print below. What do you think?
I have no particular opinion. I've never dealt with floating-point
numbers in any computer algebra system other than Sage, so I don't
William Stein wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've released sage-2.8.8. Get it at http://sagemath.org, as usual,
> or just do "sage -upgrade".
>
There seems to be some typos in the test of gap.py
Jaap
[EMAIL PROTECTED] sage-2.8.8]$ ./sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/interfaces/gap.py
sage -t devel/sage-ma
I'm currently working on ticket #329
My idea is adding to each .spkg file a .spkg.md5 file with the md5checksum
This should prevent file corruption.
I've already reimplemented the md5sum standard utility (from the
coreutils package) in python (using the md5 module), so that we
don't need to add
Martin,
Your idea that Paul's build problem was caused by boost was right.
Maybe we can figure out a way to turn off using boost completely
by default for Singular.
Carl: Paul has some suggestions for changing how real numbers
print below. What do you think?
-- William
-- Forwarded
17 matches
Mail list logo
