John,
I also wanted to mention that you should apply this latest dsage bundle
since it fixes a lot of the rough edges that William mentioned.
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/yqiang/dsage_latest.hg
There is documentation on how to do this here:
http://www.sagemath.org/doc/html/ref/module-sag
Thanks!
Yes, if you can actually believe it, I was asking (quite gently) about
running the DSage client/server under Windows. Other than my dual-
boot machine at home, I don't have access to a Linux machine here at
UVM--in particular the 31-machine lab where I'd like to run projects
from is all
Hi John,
I have only tested DSage with workers running in VMWare and not servers.
Everyone else does live in the 'happy' place :) I will try to get both the
server and workers running in Windows if I can this weekend and document the
process.
Cheers,
Yi
--
http://www.yiqiang.org
On 10/10/07, Joh
On 10/10/07, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 10/10/07, didier deshommes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > 2007/10/10, John Voight <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > >
> > > What is "screen"? Unfortunately, it is not an easy thing to Google!
> >
> > Here is a link to screen :
> > http://www
On 10/10/07, John Voight <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anyone get DSage to work under Windows/VMware?
>
> I'm able to get workers (under Windows) to connect to sage.math when I
> run the client/server there, so that works. But repeating the same
> client/server steps on a Windows machine has yield
Anyone get DSage to work under Windows/VMware?
I'm able to get workers (under Windows) to connect to sage.math when I
run the client/server there, so that works. But repeating the same
client/server steps on a Windows machine has yielded nothing. Just
wondered if anyone has tried this--or maybe
OK, that makes much more sense.
On Oct 10, 2007, at 1:05 PM, William Stein wrote:
> On 10/10/07, Robert Bradshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Only 20% compared to base-10 strings? It seems like there should be
>> more gain than that. Or was it doing something different before?
>
> pari --> s
I filed a related ticket a few month ago:
http://sagetrac.org/sage_trac/ticket/467
david
On Oct 10, 2007, at 4:05 PM, William Stein wrote:
>
> On 10/10/07, Robert Bradshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Only 20% compared to base-10 strings? It seems like there should be
>> more gain than tha
On 10/10/07, Robert Bradshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Only 20% compared to base-10 strings? It seems like there should be
> more gain than that. Or was it doing something different before?
pari --> sage hasn't been base-10 strings for years.
Gonzalo wrote optimized code for this in Feb 2006
Only 20% compared to base-10 strings? It seems like there should be
more gain than that. Or was it doing something different before?
- Robert
On Oct 10, 2007, at 10:51 AM, Craig Citro wrote:
> I have a patch to fix that just about ready to go out the door,
> actually. If you want, I could s
I have a patch to fix that just about ready to go out the door, actually. If
you want, I could send it to you and see if it makes your life easier. The
pari->sage speedup is only about 20% (which I'd like to improve), but the
sage->pari is a 5-6X speedup, and gets better with the length of the
inte
It works fine on another computer; my old apple laptop can be funny
with multimedia.
Marshall
On Oct 10, 9:28 am, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/10/07, Hamptonio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > I was really enjoying this when it froze at 4:37. I can't seem to get
> > pa
On 10/10/07, didier deshommes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> 2007/10/10, John Voight <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > What is "screen"? Unfortunately, it is not an easy thing to Google!
>
> Here is a link to screen :
> http://www.gnu.org/software/screen/
>
> There's a quick tutorial here:
> http://ww
On 10/10/07, Hamptonio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I was really enjoying this when it froze at 4:37. I can't seem to get
> past that point.
??? I have no problem at all viewing any part. Anyways, it's Google
Video, so I have nothing to do with serving the video -- it's supposed
to just work
2007/10/10, John Voight <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> What is "screen"? Unfortunately, it is not an easy thing to Google!
Here is a link to screen :
http://www.gnu.org/software/screen/
There's a quick tutorial here:
http://www.kuro5hin.org/story/2004/3/9/16838/14935
didier
--~--~-~--~~
What is "screen"? Unfortunately, it is not an easy thing to Google!
JV
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at ht
Beautiful, thanks! No my unbelievably trivial problem can be solved
extremely fast. There appears to be something else which is
inexplicably eating up time now--maybe coercion between PARI and SAGE
integers in other places...
JV
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to
I was really enjoying this when it froze at 4:37. I can't seem to get
past that point.
-Marshall
On Oct 9, 12:27 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've posted the video of Robert Bradshaw's Sage Days 5 talk on Cython
> at Google Video:
>http://video.google.com/vide
> The roadmap is the following (from the view of Alexander and me).
Sounds good to me.
> P.S.: How does SAGE handle things like protocoll output (option(prot)
> in Singular)?
right now, we don't. But in general, there is a set_verbose()/get_verbose()
function pair which sets and gets the verbo
Hi!
The roadmap is the following (from the view of Alexander and me).
1. While Burcin and Martin work on the wrapper, we try to improve the
interfaces
2. SAGE Days 6: I will be present and I hope to be able to bring my
internal knowledge of PB into the sage integration project
3. 19./20. Novembe
20 matches
Mail list logo
