[sage-devel] Re: Interactive cells, GUIs, javascript, ...

2007-09-16 Thread Chris Chiasson
One last thing, I wanted to say that my earlier Mathematica comments do not (usually) apply when dealing with the individual developers, who are (usually) very helpful, especially on MathGroup. The thing I am complaining about is the overall process of reporting and fixing problems. On Sep 14, 5:

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 2.8.3 on Solaris - A New Hope

2007-09-16 Thread mabshoff
On Sep 17, 12:16 am, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I just wanted to say awesome and keep up the good work. I'll be > testing Sage on Solaris/x86 soon. > Well, we are getting very close now: Hangs (due to pecpect issues?): sage -t rings/polynomial/multi_polynomial_element.

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 2.8.3 on Solaris - A New Hope

2007-09-16 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I just wanted to say awesome and keep up the good work. I'll be testing Sage on Solaris/x86 soon. On Sep 16, 3:25 pm, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED] dortmund.de> wrote: > On Sep 16, 9:13 pm, "didier deshommes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > 2007/9/16, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Hello Didie

[sage-devel] Re: sage+gap conf stuff

2007-09-16 Thread Martin Albrecht
> For future reference, about 3-4 days ago I changed things so that the > public notebook server: >(1) Doesn't use ssl at all, and >(2) Is at http://sagenb.org (and another at http://sagenb.com), so > there is no funny business with ports. > Thus the above setup shouldn't get blo

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 2.8.3 on Solaris - A New Hope

2007-09-16 Thread mabshoff
On Sep 16, 9:13 pm, "didier deshommes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2007/9/16, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Hello Didier, > > > it looks like you are running a fairly recent OpenSolaris build. But > > is it "pure" OpenSolaris or Nexenta? I know you used Nexenta in the > > past, but that is quit

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 2.8.3 on Solaris - A New Hope

2007-09-16 Thread didier deshommes
2007/9/16, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > it looks like you are running a fairly recent OpenSolaris build. But > is it "pure" OpenSolaris or Nexenta? I know you used Nexenta in the > past, but that is quite different because the userspace is close to > 100% GNU while Solaris is sufficiently diffe

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 2.8.3 on Solaris - A New Hope

2007-09-16 Thread mabshoff
On Sep 16, 8:17 pm, "didier deshommes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2007/9/16, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > Solaris 10 on Opteron: > > > toolchain: > > > ../gcc-4.2.1/configure --with-ld=/usr/sfw/i386-sun-solaris2.10/bin/ld > > --with-as=/usr/sfw/bin/gas \ > > --prefix=/usr/local/gcc-4.2.

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 2.8.3 on Solaris - A New Hope

2007-09-16 Thread didier deshommes
2007/9/16, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Solaris 10 on Opteron: > > toolchain: > > ../gcc-4.2.1/configure --with-ld=/usr/sfw/i386-sun-solaris2.10/bin/ld > --with-as=/usr/sfw/bin/gas \ > --prefix=/usr/local/gcc-4.2.1 --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran --with- > gmp=/usr/local/gmp-4.2.2-32/ \ > --wi

[sage-devel] Re: sage+gap conf stuff

2007-09-16 Thread Mike Hansen
Speaking of parallel processing in Python, I recently heard about the pp module: http://www.parallelpython.com/ It may be something that we want to look at. --Mike On 9/16/07, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 9/16/07, David Joyner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Some comments on t

[sage-devel] Re: sage+gap conf stuff

2007-09-16 Thread William Stein
On 9/16/07, David Joyner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Some comments on the recent GAP comments relevant to SAGE: > > (0) The talk on SAGE went quite well and generated interest. Excellent. > (1) Many GAP developers and some GAP packages authors like > SAGE and plan on looking into the extra func