On Aug 16, 6:36 am, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
dortmund.de> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> athttp://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/atlas-3.7.37.spkgyou
> can find anATLASSPKG. Right now it only builds dynamic and static
> versions ofATLAS. It takes about 15-20 minutes on a decent Athlon 64.
> It h
On Aug 16, 2007, at 3:55 PM, William Stein wrote:
>
> On 8/16/07, John Cremona <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Yes, that's what I meant -- and luckily William has a sense of
>> humour!
>
> I very much do have a sense of humor :-) And I'm almost impossible
> to offend.
OK, now that's a challeng
FYI, people interested in Axiom for Sage:
There is now a third fork of the Axiom project ...
OpenAxiom project seems to have a different emphasis than the second
Axiom fork project called FriCAS introduced by Waldek Hebisch about 1
month ago, but otherwise the goals of these two new "Axiom" proj
William Stein wrote:
> On 8/16/07, John Cremona <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Yes, that's what I meant -- and luckily William has a sense of humour!
>
> I very much do have a sense of humor :-) And I'm almost impossible
> to offend.
>
A condition 'sine qua non'!
Jaap
--~--~-~--~
On 8/16/07, John Cremona <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, that's what I meant -- and luckily William has a sense of humour!
I very much do have a sense of humor :-) And I'm almost impossible
to offend.
William
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send e
> >
> > I'm very sorry for not carefully reading the email before moderating
> > it "send" -- I usually just check that postings aren't blatant spam.
> > In the future I'll be more careful when moderating messages.
> >
> > -- William
>
> i interprted john's statement to mean that arash owes you, w
On Aug 16, 2007, at 12:38 PM, William Stein wrote:
> I don't know, but you might want to try this tarball:
>
> http://sage.math.washington.edu/lj/sage-2.8.a.tar
>
> This has the option of doing
>export SAGE_FORTRAN=/path/to/any/fortran
> etc and many other build improvements.
> Please give
On 8/16/07, Michael Abshoff \
> > I don't like including pre-released code.
> >
>
> Really?
Yes.
> How many packages are straight from some development repo?
scipy and linbox
I think mpfi and tachyon are beta releases.
I think everything else in SAGe is an official release -- Singular,
Pyth
On Aug 16, 2007, at 11:07 AM, David Harvey wrote:
>
>
> On Aug 16, 2007, at 12:35 AM, Justin C. Walker wrote:
>
Has the included fortran binary been tested on other similar
systems?
>>>
>>> Yes, it works fine on fermat.math.harvard.edu, and I think on Justin
>>> Walker's G5.
>>
>> Yup.
On 8/16/07, David Harvey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Aug 16, 2007, at 12:35 AM, Justin C. Walker wrote:
> >>> Has the included fortran binary been tested on other similar
> >>> systems?
> >>
> >> Yes, it works fine on fermat.math.harvard.edu, and I think on Justin
> >> Walker's G5.
> >
> > Yup
On Aug 15, 2007, at 10:53 PM, William Stein wrote:
> On 8/15/07, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> dortmund.de> wrote:
>
>> That was a fun way to get work done. I think that it would be
>> great to
>> get people on non-Solaris boxen to verify that the modified packages
>> still work as expected.
>
On Aug 16, 2007, at 12:35 AM, Justin C. Walker wrote:
>>> Has the included fortran binary been tested on other similar
>>> systems?
>>
>> Yes, it works fine on fermat.math.harvard.edu, and I think on Justin
>> Walker's G5.
>
> Yup. SAGE 2.8 builds and passes 'make test' on my G5 (both for me
On Aug 15, 2007, at 9:21 PM, William Stein wrote:
>
> On 8/15/07, David Harvey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Well the included binary works at least to this extent:
>>
>> ~/sage-2.8/local/bin
>> george$ ./sage_fortran.bin --version
>> G95 (GCC 4.0.3 (g95 0.91!) Jun 4 2007)
>> Copyright (C) 2002
> I did edit all the needed bits to make the coerce code compile, but
> now I get the following failure in multi_polynomial_libsingular:
>
> gcc -fno-strict-aliasing -DNDEBUG -g -O3 -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -
> fPIC -I/extra/home/mabshoff/SAGE-build/sage-2.8/local/include/singular
> -I/extra/ho
Saturday would be better for me too.
On Aug 15, 9:38 pm, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
dortmund.de> wrote:
> On Aug 16, 3:55 am, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On 8/15/07, David Harvey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > On Aug 15, 2007, at 8:36 PM, William Stein wrote:
> > > >
Hello,
On Tue, 14 Aug 2007 17:12:02 +0200
Martin Albrecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > William Stein wrote:
> > > I'll wait for the answers to the above questions. I would be
> > > fine with including
> > > scons in SAGE. I think it's already in one of the optional
> > > packages (I can't r
Hello,
I had a closer look and the problem seems to originate mostly in the
coercion code:
I changed all single letter capital variables in
sage/structure/coerce.pyx
sage/structure/element.pyx
sage/categories/action.pyx
sage/structure/parent.pyx
but I still get a compilation failure in coerce.
> This is a list a lot bigger than I thought. Martin is right to suggest
> a bug squashing day. Maybe it should be a more than a day a month
> until the backlog gets much smaller.
Lets see how it works out first. If we can convince ourselves that fixing bugs
is like playing a video game, we
a) a
18 matches
Mail list logo
