William Stein wrote:
>
> Hi Michael,
>
> The problems you mention below should all be fixed now.
> Let me know if they aren't.
>
> -- William
>
Hey William,
all fixed now, I am mirroring out as I write this.
Cheers,
Michael
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to th
Hi Michael,
The problems you mention below should all be fixed now.
Let me know if they aren't.
-- William
On 7/24/07, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I have been running the sage mirror in Germany for a while. I mirror
> from sage.math.washington.edu and for a while it seem
On 7/11/07, Brian Granger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I now have someone here at my company that is going to help maintain
> spkgs. We have a number of spkgs that i) SAGE currently doesn't have
> and ii) SAGE does have but we have updated or added bug fixes. A
> while back there was agreement o
Hello SAGErs,
I have finally released SAGE-2.7.1, which includes scipy, g95
(fortran), and should build
and install fairly reliably on many machines. I've also posted
binaries for OS X,
Linux, and vmware at http://sagemath.org/download.html/. Many thanks
to everyone
for all there help!
Here is
Hello,
I have been running the sage mirror in Germany for a while. I mirror
from sage.math.washington.edu and for a while it seems that now all
binary builds of sage are up to date there. For example:
sagemath.org:
[ ] sage-2.7-32bit-debian-i686-Linux.tar.gz 19-Jul-2007 22:44
181M
[ ] sage-
On 7/24/07, Justin C. Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 7/23/07, Justin C. Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Tried this on both the PowerMac (2x2.7GHz G5) and MacBook Pro (2.33
> >> Mhz Intel Core 2 Duo). SAGE built without an apparent problem on
> >> both systems.
> >
> > Excellent.
On Jul 23, 2007, at 10:57 PM, William Stein wrote:
>
> On 7/23/07, Justin C. Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Tried this on both the PowerMac (2x2.7GHz G5) and MacBook Pro (2.33
>> Mhz Intel Core 2 Duo). SAGE built without an apparent problem on
>> both systems.
>
> Excellent. This is grea
On 7/24/07, David Joyner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 7/21/07, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi Jack,
> >
> > The last bugfix for cyclotomic field is really good.
> >
> > The one for the permgroup names is good, though I would go even further,
> > since, e.g., this is bad and con
On 7/24/07, Jack Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> GAP takes under a second to compute Bell(1000), compared to over a
> minute (and going) for maple on the same computer.
Gap takes about 1 second for this on one of my test machines.
Nick Alexander wrote an optimized native SAGE function tha
GAP takes under a second to compute Bell(1000), compared to over a
minute (and going) for maple on the same computer.
On Jul 24, 3:32 pm, "Alec Mihailovs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> May I suggest to add timing to the examples in the documentation - that
> would be very useful.
>
> For example,
May I suggest to add timing to the examples in the documentation - that
would be very useful.
For example, in recent discussion about Bell numbers on the math-fun list,
it was noted that it takes a very long time to calculate bell(1000) in Maple
while BellB[1000] in Mathematica is much faster.
On 7/24/07, Pablo De Napoli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> In order to avoid this package, the clisp version of gentoo
>
> http://packages.gentoo.org/packages/?category=dev-lisp;name=clisp
>
> includes a patch: maybe you would like to apply it to the Sage version of
> clisp
Thanks! This is just
On 7/24/07, Pablo De Napoli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've tried to build sage-2.7.1 on a Gentoo Linux x86 host
>
> At first, I failed because clisp needs the kernel header
> asm/page.h in order to buld and
> the package sys-kernel/linux-headers-2.6.20-r2 lacks of it.
> Howver, after downgradin
In order to avoid this package, the clisp version of gentoo
http://packages.gentoo.org/packages/?category=dev-lisp;name=clisp
includes a patch: maybe you would like to apply it to the Sage version of clisp
The patch is by Bruno Haible, who is one of the main clisp developes.
Pablo
2007-05-20
Hi,
I've tried to build sage-2.7.1 on a Gentoo Linux x86 host
At first, I failed because clisp needs the kernel header
asm/page.h in order to buld and
the package sys-kernel/linux-headers-2.6.20-r2 lacks of it.
Howver, after downgrading my kernel headers to 2.6.17-r2
I could sucessfully built it
Ted wrote:
> Before one can determine what SAGE's documentation should look like, I
> think that one must first try to gain an understanding of how the
> technologies that SAGE depends on ( and also technologies in general )
> are going to evolve over the next 20 years.
I'd like to give a concre
16 matches
Mail list logo
