On Jul 23, 2007, at 22:57 , William Stein wrote:
>
> On 7/23/07, Justin C. Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Tried this on both the PowerMac (2x2.7GHz G5) and MacBook Pro (2.33
>> Mhz Intel Core 2 Duo). SAGE built without an apparent problem on
>> both systems.
>
> Excellent. This is great
On 7/23/07, Justin C. Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tried this on both the PowerMac (2x2.7GHz G5) and MacBook Pro (2.33
> Mhz Intel Core 2 Duo). SAGE built without an apparent problem on
> both systems.
Excellent. This is great news. I also posted a slightly newer alpha5 tarball
tonight
On Jul 22, 2007, at 18:30 , William Stein wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> This weekend Josh Kantor and I redid the new SAGE build system so that
> (1) it uses g95 instead of gfortran, and
> (2) it includes the g95 binaries (instead of downloading them during
> the build).
Tried this on both the PowerMac
Everything built OK on a powerpc laptop running OS X 10.4.10. The
import scipy.optimize was fine as well apart from some compiler
warnings:
sage: import scipy.optimize
/Users/mh/sage-2.0/local/lib/python2.5/site-packages/numpy/testing/
numpytest.py:634: DeprecationWarning: ScipyTest is now calle
On the amd64, debian "4.0", build went smoothly. No extra tests
failed. Scipy.optimize loaded without complaint.
The following tests failed:
sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/
padic_lseries.py
sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/
ell_rational
On 7/23/07, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 7/23/07, David Joyner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'm not sure Keith is a sage-devel subscriber but also I only cc'd
> > the list one of the last posts in the thread. The original post
> > describes what he wants. Here is a piece of it
On 7/23/07, David Joyner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm not sure Keith is a sage-devel subscriber but also I only cc'd
> the list one of the last posts in the thread. The original post
> describes what he wants. Here is a piece of it:
Unfortunately, it doesn't describe what he wants clearly eno
I'm not sure Keith is a sage-devel subscriber but also I only cc'd
the list one of the last posts in the thread. The original post
describes what he wants. Here is a piece of it:
...
I have some computations I'd like to make in a quotient ring
(i.e. R/I) for R the integral group ring of a finit
Keith,
Could you be more precise about what computations you want
to do in a quotient of a noncommutative group ring? Do you just
want to do basic arithmetic? Do you need to check equality?
Do you need abstract structure statements?
-- William
On 7/23/07, Martin Albrecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To whom it may concern,
there is plural: http://www.singular.uni-kl.de/Manual/latest/sing_349.htm
which is shipped with SAGE (though, the interface hasn't been worked on)
sage: singular.lib('ncalg.lib')
sage: a = singular.makeUsl2()
sage: W = singular.ring(0,'(x,d)','dp')
sage: singular.Weyl()
Builds fine on x86 64-bit Debian/testing
The following tests failed:
sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/matrix/matrix2.pyx
sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/ell_rational_field.py
sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/padic_lseries.py
Good work!
Martin
--
name: M
I think SAGE does not yet have that functionality. I vaguely remember something
on the sage devel list about a guy who said he'd work on that (a
bright undergrad
at Harvey Mudd whose name escapes me now) is traveling over the summer
and may not be reachable until the fall.
+++
I would vote for putting that content in the "Guided Tour" part of the
tutorial. I think the variety of documentation would be a little too
fragmented otherwise. In my limited experience so far, new users of
sage can already be confused about where they should look things up.
-Marshall
On Jul
Ted: Very very interesting. Thanks for the great comments and the
offer to help.
+++
On 7/23/07, Ted Kosan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> William wrote:
>
> > I think SAGE might potentially greatly benefit from certain types of new
> > documentation.
(1) Version 2.7.1 installed and compiled fine on a suse 10.2 amd64 machine.
SAGE build/upgrade complete!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/sagefiles/sage-2.7.1.alpha3> ./sage
--
| SAGE Version 2.7.1.alpha3, Release Date: 2007-07-22
William wrote:
> I think SAGE might potentially greatly benefit from certain types of new
> documentation.
I have been thinking about the topic of SAGE's documentation for a
couple of months now and here is what I have come up with so far.
Before one can determine what SAGE's documentation sh
Build failed trying to build lapack:
Host system
uname -a:
Linux eight 2.6.18-4-amd64 #1 SMP Thu May 10 01:01:58 UTC 2007 x86_64 GNU/Linux
I'll help; and I'm pretty familiar (as a user) with the algebra / combinatorics
bits.
On Sun, 22 Jul 2007, William Stein wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I think SAGE might potentially greatly benefit from certain types of new
> documentation. Unfortunately, after consider a number of possibilities,
>
18 matches
Mail list logo
