[sage-devel] Re: build test help?

2007-07-22 Thread Mike Hansen
Hello, Everything built and installed perfectly under Ubuntu 7.04 with a 64-bit Core 2 Duo. --Mike On 7/22/07, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > This weekend Josh Kantor and I redid the new SAGE build system so that > (1) it uses g95 instead of gfortran, and > (2) it incl

[sage-devel] Siegel modular forms and SAGE

2007-07-22 Thread Nathan Ryan
Attached you'll find what I think is a patch that includes 600 lines of code that implements a barebones Siegel modular forms class (I also included a tarred .sage file just to be sure). It's written by David Grunewald and myself and is based on a 1993 paper by Skoruppa. A lot of what David wr

[sage-devel] Re: SAGE Documentation brainstorming

2007-07-22 Thread David Joyner
Sounds like a great idea. You might consider adding a chapter for users who are looking for pre-calculus help (trig, simple algebra, other HS topics), an idea suggested by Mike O'Sullivan. On 7/22/07, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello, > > I think SAGE might potentially greatly

[sage-devel] Re: SAGE Documentation brainstorming

2007-07-22 Thread Timothy Clemans
What would the plan for the plotting documentation be? Would there be an overview of the plot objects followed by some small projects? For me I sort of get the basics of plotting in SAGE but do not really know how to do much in the way of mathematical art. For example I would have no idea how to m

[sage-devel] Re: [Pyrex] Pyrex idioms and optimizations?

2007-07-22 Thread William Stein
On 7/12/07, Stefan Behnel <> wrote: > Robert Bradshaw wrote: > > As part of the SAGE project, and due to the difficulty in getting > > some essential (to us) patches upstream, we have been keeping a > > separate branch of Pyrex named SageX. It's just Pyrex + (a bunch of > > patches) > > That remin

[sage-devel] SAGE Documentation brainstorming

2007-07-22 Thread William Stein
Hello, I think SAGE might potentially greatly benefit from certain types of new documentation. Unfortunately, after consider a number of possibilities, I'm unsure about how to proceed. I'll discuss the best idea Josh Kantor and I came up with below. Let me know what you think, or suggest somet

[sage-devel] build test help?

2007-07-22 Thread William Stein
Hi, This weekend Josh Kantor and I redid the new SAGE build system so that (1) it uses g95 instead of gfortran, and (2) it includes the g95 binaries (instead of downloading them during the build). It would be incredibly useful to Josh Kantor and I if a few of you could download the tarball h

[sage-devel] Re: Packaging Sage

2007-07-22 Thread William Stein
On 7/19/07, Georges Khaznadar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > William Stein a écrit : > > (1) Create a monolothic .deb, which installs everything SAGE currently > > distributes in /opt/sage/, along with a run script /usr/bin/sage. > > This stage is OK : the debian package was built finely, but it is

[sage-devel] Re: sage 2.7 on ppc build problem

2007-07-22 Thread William Stein
On 7/22/07, Hamptonio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Building from scratch on a ppc laptop, I run aground when it gets to > lapack. I already had a gfortran installed which may be the problem. It's almost certainly caused by that. Please use a binary or wait for sage-2.7.1, which will be releas

[sage-devel] sage 2.7 on ppc build problem

2007-07-22 Thread Hamptonio
Building from scratch on a ppc laptop, I run aground when it gets to lapack. I already had a gfortran installed which may be the problem. Here are the errors I get at the end of the install attempt: ( cd INSTALL; make; ./testlsame; ./testslamch; \ ./testdlamch; ./testsecond; ./testdsecnd; ./te