On 7/20/07, Justin C. Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have a continuing problem building SAGE on Mac OS X/PowerPC. The
> problem always seems to boil down to this kind of error:
>
> fork: Resource temporarily unavailable
>
> Check your install log to see if that is the problem. I don't
On Jul 20, 2007, at 11:22 PM, Justin C. Walker wrote:
> I have a continuing problem building SAGE on Mac OS X/PowerPC. The
> problem always seems to boil down to this kind of error:
>
> fork: Resource temporarily unavailable
>
> Check your install log to see if that is the problem. I don't
On 7/20/07, Pablo De Napoli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Concerning (2)
>
> I think that if a gfortran it is already installed in the system, it
> would be reasonable to use rather than downloading a binary.
Issues:
(1) If it's gfortran 3.x then it will fail miserably at building
certain compon
On Jul 20, 2007, at 22:49 , William Stein wrote:
>
> On 7/20/07, Craig Citro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> William -- I just tried to get sage 2.7 on my g4 laptop. Should
>> sage -
>> upgrade work to get 2.7? If so, it failed and I'll post a bug report
>> to sage-devel; if not, I'll just downl
On 7/20/07, Jack Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The mercurial repository contained in this tar file is corrupted
> making it impossible (for me at least) to resubmit my patches.
Could you please elaborate on why you think the hg repository
in sage-2.7.spkg is corrupted?I'd really like
On 7/20/07, Craig Citro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> William -- I just tried to get sage 2.7 on my g4 laptop. Should sage -
> upgrade work to get 2.7? If so, it failed and I'll post a bug report
> to sage-devel; if not, I'll just download and compile from source.
As I mentioned in the message I s
On 7/20/07, Arthur Gaer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 1) It just occurred to me: why did you need to compile SAGE 2.7 on a
> PPC, I thought a currently built 10.4 binary was universal,
> regardless of where it was compiled. Obviously that must not be
> true, so what's up with that?
I wish. Perha
In fact, trying to upgrade from sage-2.6 on a Linux x86 host failed, with
the following error messages (when building f2c,related to this)
cd spkg && ./install all 2>&1 | tee -a ../install.log
make[1]: se ingresa al directorio `/hdc1/pablo.hdc1/sage/sage/spkg'
sage-spkg installed/f2c-1 2>&1
f2c-1
Concerning (2)
I think that if a gfortran it is already installed in the system, it
would be reasonable to use rather than downloading a binary.(gfortran
is in fact, a standard part of gcc, if gcc from the host system is
used for compiling the parts of sage writen in C, why not doing the
same wit
There are two levels of problems
1. We can't include 64 bit compilers because we have no binaries that
work for them.
2. The ar extracting hack is because we are tricking numpy's
distutils into doing what we want.
(More detailed explanation: Numpy's distutils has python classes for
different
The mercurial repository contained in this tar file is corrupted
making it impossible (for me at least) to resubmit my patches. They
continue to fix the following bugs:
sage: G = PermutationGroup(['(1,2,3)', '(2,3)'])
sage: G.cayley_table()
versus:
sage: G = SymmetricGroup(3)
sage: G.cayley_t
Workaround for those who want to get a little further:
tar -xf sage-2.7.tar
cd sage-2.7
mkdir -p spkg/installed
touch spkg/installed/f2c-1
touch spkg/installed/cvxopt-0.8.2
touch spkg/installed/gfortran-20070719
Now ensure that you have a symlink to g77 in your path called
"gfortran"
make
On Ju
Hi there,
the following packages failed to build/install/upgrade on my Debian/testing
x86_64 system:
[gfortran] failed to recognize my gfortran installation, fixed spkg-installed
already sent to William off list
[f2c-1] tries to copy libgfortran.a from /usr/lib while it is located in
usr/lib
SAGE now includes f2py which auto-generates python wrappers for
fortran code. We have a magic %fortran command that allows one to
write fortran directly in the notebook. We also include weave, which
does the sage things but for C (we've had that for a while).
I have written some notes that give e
14 matches
Mail list logo
