> I got swamped by teaching, SAGE Days 4, SIMUW, and... buying a house
> this week (!), so I haven't been able to move anything forward.
> Fortunately, I have no formal responsibilities for the next two
> months, so a lot is likely to happen in the near future.
Nice!
> My plan is to start workin
Well the biggest reason is just inertia: my department has been using
mathematica for years, and everyone has a full set of computer labs
and handouts and demos already done in mathematica. Why learn a new
system and have to port everything over? We don't even directly pay
for the license as a d
On 7/11/07, Hamptonio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I would be willing to chip in some effort on the mathematica.sage
> file, although not in the very near future. I plan to begin migrating
> my undergraduate courses to sage from mathematica for fall semester
> 2008. I hope to convince other fa
On 7/11/07, Brian Granger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I now have someone here at my company that is going to help maintain
> spkgs. We have a number of spkgs that i) SAGE currently doesn't have
> and ii) SAGE does have but we have updated or added bug fixes. A
> while back there was agreement o
I would be willing to chip in some effort on the mathematica.sage
file, although not in the very near future. I plan to begin migrating
my undergraduate courses to sage from mathematica for fall semester
2008. I hope to convince other faculty do to the same, but it won't
be easy. I am mainly in
Hi,
I now have someone here at my company that is going to help maintain
spkgs. We have a number of spkgs that i) SAGE currently doesn't have
and ii) SAGE does have but we have updated or added bug fixes. A
while back there was agreement on a new standard format for what the
structure of an spk
On 7/11/07, Joel B. Mohler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think the init file idea needs to be pushed harder. I already do this and
> the
> flexibility is absolutely critical to my happiness. I even have my init file
> call another file in the current directory so I can have different things
>
On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 02:54:31PM -0700, William Stein wrote:
> On 7/10/07, David Harvey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I don't really like the idea of "modules that imitate various
> > environments", i.e. I don't think it's possible or desirable for us to
> > try to look specifically like any ot
On 7/10/07, Ted Kosan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have found myself using numerical_approx() instead of RR() because
> it is also placed at the end of the line and so is relatively easy to
> locate the cursor there and add it. With RR(), one has to wrap the
> code in a function and then unwrap
