On Saturday 30 June 2007 07:11, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
> +1 for little endian-ness. As well as consistency, I think big endian
> only makes sense for fixed size words. Otherwise you have to know how
> large the number is to know what each digit represents, and it seems
> odd to me to, say, subtrac
Robert's talk is at
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1411595488225362800&hl=en
On 6/29/07, Timothy Clemans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Wait I have to get the permission of each speaker to put his/her talk
> on Google Video? I wish that had been dealt with at SAGE Days 4.
>
> On 6/29/07, W
