Hamptonio wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was just at the SIAM dynamical systems meeting in Snowbird, and it
> got me curious about how support for dynamical systems could be put
> into sage. Unfortunately, the research I was presenting was done
Maxima already has some material on dynamical systems
http://f
http://www.cam.cornell.edu/~rclewley/cgi-bin/moin.cgi/ProjectOverview#head-702b485f9c8e1152ee4a6cd65f2cc5974da6a8ea
There's a link to the project overview, I forgot to put it in the
original post.
On Jun 8, 1:14 pm, Hamptonio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was just at the SIAM dynamical
Hi,
I was just at the SIAM dynamical systems meeting in Snowbird, and it
got me curious about how support for dynamical systems could be put
into sage. Unfortunately, the research I was presenting was done
entirely in Mathematica, so I couldn't give sage a lot of press. I
did show sage to vario
My benchmarks agree. The gap between primes is so small as to make my
communication point moot. Even checking some of the record setting
prime gaps, the pure pari method was never more than 20% faster, and I
think asymptotically it is likely they are equal speed (gaps don't get
big enough fast e
