What is the official channel to discus the notebook?
There seems to be a minor nuissance with the user interface. On all
browsers
I tried the scrollbar of a cell is partly under the global scrollbar
which is
disturbing.
I think I actually want the cells to have no scrollbar at all, i.e. to
just
Robert Bradshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Jun 5, 2007, at 10:01 PM, Nick Alexander wrote:
>
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>>
>>> Yikes, that sounds like a bug. FWIW, I think it's a good policy
>>> to never touch the main branch. When I want to test a patch, I
>>> make a new branch fro
On Jun 5, 2007, at 10:01 PM, Nick Alexander wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
>> Yikes, that sounds like a bug. FWIW, I think it's a good policy
>> to never touch the main branch. When I want to test a patch, I
>> make a new branch from the clean one, and apply the patch (or set
>> of
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Yikes, that sounds like a bug. FWIW, I think it's a good policy to never
> touch the main branch. When I want to test a patch, I make a new branch from
> the clean one, and apply the patch (or set of patches) there.
I'd love to do that, but sage -branch takes upwa
Yikes, that sounds like a bug. FWIW, I think it's a good policy to never touch
the main branch. When I want to test a patch, I make a new branch from the
clean one, and apply the patch (or set of patches) there.
On Tue, 5 Jun 2007, Nick Alexander wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> sage -upgrade seem
Hello all,
sage -upgrade seems to be blowing away my committed hg patches that
have not been pushed to William yet.
To the best of my memory, that did not happen in the past; has this
changed? Am I doing something wrong? This is getting annoying --
it's very hard to submit patches against up-t
Kate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Nick Alexander suggests using os.path.realpath or os.path.normpath.
> Neither work on this network, and so I suspect those functions are
> not portable.
Thanks for the heads up. Could I suggest better docstrings and a test
or two?
Nick
--~--~-~--~---
Hi:
1. Plot question: has anyone looked into
http://pyqwt.sourceforge.net/?
It seems to have some 3d capabilities
http://pyqwt.sourceforge.net/pyqwt3d-examples.html
but requires qt.
2. Some links on the wiki
http://www.sagemath.org:9001/Software_that_may_be_useful
seem to be broken since they poi
I've also got another library problem:
--
| SAGE Version 2.6, Release Date: 2007-06-02 |
| Type notebook() for the GUI, and license() for information.|
-
Hello,
due to work and I being lazy the last week I didn't work on
SAGEControl until yesterday. A first 0.0.1 snapshot can be seen at
http://apcocoa.org/~mabshoff/snapshots/SAGEControl-0.0.1.png
The snapshot should give you an idea how the code will work. You
cannot start the notebook at the mo
OK, thanks. I will look into hacking the quiver function.
It is unclear to me, from your response, if you understand the problem
with plot_vector_field in its current form. The example from the
wolfram site is somewhat misleading, since it uses a vector field of
the form (f(x),g(y)), but this is
On 6/5/07, Joshua Kantor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I just downloaded the sage-2.6 OSX intel binaries. They ran fine but
> when I tried to clone a repository and do -ba
Where and when did you download this? Could you download
from sagemath.org and try again? I had posted a "defective" binar
I just downloaded the sage-2.6 OSX intel binaries. They ran fine but
when I tried to clone a repository and do -ba
I got the errors
usr/bin/ld: Undefined symbols:
___gmpn_add_n referenced from libntl expected to be defined in /Users/
was/tmp/sage-2.6.alpha1/local/lib/libgmp.3.dylib
___gmpn_addmul_
On 6/5/07, alex clemesha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Any chance you could "commit" to implementing the
> > other vector field plots during SD4 next week?
>
> Yes, I guess could 'commit' ...
> ... does that mean 'promise to implement perfectly', I at least commit to
> try ;)
Excellent!
> b.t.w
> Any chance you could "commit" to implementing the
> other vector field plots during SD4 next week?
Yes, I guess could 'commit' ...
... does that mean 'promise to implement perfectly', I at least commit to
try ;)
b.t.w. Dorian and I have been working very hard on our project
that we are calling
Alex,
Any chance you could "commit" to implementing the
other vector field plots during SD4 next week?
On 6/5/07, alex clemesha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> >
> > At the moment, plot_vector_field is only capable of plotting product
> > vector fields, which is unacceptable for my use of it
> At the moment, plot_vector_field is only capable of plotting product
> vector fields, which is unacceptable for my use of it in an ODE
> class. Since it is a crucial issue for my use, I plan on trying to
> extend it to handle arbitrary 2d fields, unless Alex Clemesha feels
> like doing it for me
>> sage: maxima('%s' % (repr(x^2+1),))
>> x^2+1
>> sage: maxima('%s' % (x^2+1,))
>> This hangs because of the \t
>>
>> From my background, you would expect the canonical string conversion to
>> naturally work. I use the % operator on strings a great deal so I want
>> str(object) to nicely t
On Jun 5, 2007, at 10:55 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>> sage: maxima('%s' % (repr(x^2+1),))
>>> x^2+1
>>> sage: maxima('%s' % (x^2+1,))
>>> This hangs because of the \t
>>>
>>> From my background, you would expect the canonical string
>>> conversion to
>>> naturally work. I use the % op
On 6/5/07, Michel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I think I agree with Joel here. str(...) should give something
> which is suitable for embedding in text. In case of maxima
> objects it doesn't do that. In fact when I first encountered
> this behaviour I thought the str(...) function had a bug. I
I think I agree with Joel here. str(...) should give something
which is suitable for embedding in text. In case of maxima
objects it doesn't do that. In fact when I first encountered
this behaviour I thought the str(...) function had a bug. It hadn't
occurred to me that the \t's where for 2d disp
On Tuesday 05 June 2007 12:09, William Stein wrote:
> On 6/5/07, Joel B. Mohler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > sage: maxima('%s' % (repr(x^2+1),))
> > x^2+1
> > sage: maxima('%s' % (x^2+1,))
> > This hangs because of the \t
>
> By the way, I think this is a very bad way of moving
> symbolic e
Thanks, setting a breakpoint at exit allowed me to get a stacktrace
which told me that
the function called before exit is xerbla_ in the dynamic library
liblapack.so.
So the LD_PRELOAD trick may work. I can't seem to get it to work with
sage yet though.
Is there a similar command to LD_PRELOAD a
Michel,
> BTW
>
> My name is Michel and not Michael!
Sincere apologies!
Kate
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this grou
On 6/5/07, Joel B. Mohler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> sage: maxima('%s' % (repr(x^2+1),))
> x^2+1
> sage: maxima('%s' % (x^2+1,))
> This hangs because of the \t
>
By the way, I think this is a very bad way of moving
symbolic expressions into Maxima. *Much* *much* better
are any of the foll
On 6/5/07, Michel Van den Bergh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I have things running pretty well now. Below are my notes.
> Perhaps they can posted on the Wiki somewhere (in polished form).
>
Could you make a new section of the SAGE install
guide and send me a patch? To do this:
(1) cd t
On 6/5/07, Joel B. Mohler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm find the string representations of symbolic expressions to be a little
> non-intuitive.
Short answer: use "repr". SAGE is just following
the official Python guidelines for str versus repr:
str -- nice display to screen representati
One thing I can't figure out is how to make the arrows a constant
length. Any suggestions?
Thanks,
Marshall
On Jun 5, 9:39 am, Hamptonio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At the moment, plot_vector_field is only capable of plotting product
> vector fields, which is unacceptable for my use of it in a
On 6/5/07, Michel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Well this problem I could solve. They were caused by an /etc/mtab
> file which was out of sync, making mount -a believe some
> filesystems were mounted when they weren't.
>
> I have now a running setup. The only problem is that one has
> to be root
On Jun 5, 2007, at 01:18 , Joshua Kantor wrote:
>
> Thanks, I had forgot about that sort of thing and it might work. I'm
> not sure because some of the libraries linked in are static.
>
> My python module links against libsuperlu.a which is static which
> links against libblas. Because
> lib
Ok thanks for the explanation.
BTW
My name is Michel and not Michael!
On Jun 5, 3:54 pm, Kate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Michael,
>
> Thanks for the URL. (Alternately, you could have told me to look
> in the
>
> maxima.console() works but not maxima.interact()
>
> thread.)
>
> I do not
At the moment, plot_vector_field is only capable of plotting product
vector fields, which is unacceptable for my use of it in an ODE
class. Since it is a crucial issue for my use, I plan on trying to
extend it to handle arbitrary 2d fields, unless Alex Clemesha feels
like doing it for me. Any ti
I'm find the string representations of symbolic expressions to be a little
non-intuitive. The following transcript illustrates my concerns:
sage: type(x)
sage: str(x^2+1)
'\t\t\t\t 2\r\n \t\t\t\tx + 1'
sage: x^2+1
x^2 + 1
sage: print str(x^2+1)
Michael,
Thanks for the URL. (Alternately, you could have told me to look
in the
maxima.console() works but not maxima.interact()
thread.)
I do not have a problem with William's fix.
To explain why strip_automount_prefix() is necessary, some
computer networks only mount directories "on d
This one!
Hope the URL works.
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel/browse_thread/thread/ea56d4fc266fd79b/7bc0cb3bb2ff28cc?lnk=st&q=&rnum=4#7bc0cb3bb2ff28cc
Michel
On Jun 5, 2:46 pm, Kate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Michael,
>
> Which thread?
>
> Kate
>
> On Jun 4, 2:04 pm, Michel <[EMAIL
Michael,
Which thread?
Kate
On Jun 4, 2:04 pm, Michel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> William already posted a patch to this in another thread!
>
> On Jun 4, 7:39 pm, Nick Alexander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > PS. Strictly speaking one should use os.path.separator instead of
> > > "/" :-)
>
Well this problem I could solve. They were caused by an /etc/mtab
file which was out of sync, making mount -a believe some
filesystems were mounted when they weren't.
I have now a running setup. The only problem is that one has
to be root to do chroot in Fedora. So I created a user "sage"
inside
I have compiled sage from source in a FC7 chroot environment on FC4.
Everything works fine except pexpect which I can't get to work
properly.
sage: import pexpect
sage: pexpect.spawn("maxima")
Traceback (most recent call
last)
: Pexpect: pty.fork() failed: out of
pty dev
Thanks, I had forgot about that sort of thing and it might work. I'm
not sure because some of the libraries linked in are static.
My python module links against libsuperlu.a which is static which
links against libblas. Because
libsuperlu.a is static I'm not sure whether the static or dynamic
Michel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> At the risk of saying something really stupid (as I am relatively
> clueless
> in the matter)it seems LD_PRELOAD is often used
> to achieve the effect you want.
The same thought crossed my mind, but not wanting to do the followup
reading I kept my mouth s
40 matches
Mail list logo
