On 5/24/07, Robert Bradshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hmm... do I have to quit all other instances of sage first?
Yes, good point. Otherwise there are some problems involving
the pid file. Thanks for pointing this out.
I've now fixed the problem and some others. I'm uploading
a new .app
Works fine for me.
On 5/24/07, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> If you use an intel-based mac, could you possibly try out the dmg that
> I've posted here
> and let me know if it works for you:
>
> http://www.sagemath.org/incoming/
>
> It is supposed to be the case that wh
Hmm... do I have to quit all other instances of sage first?
On May 24, 2007, at 6:06 PM, William Stein wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> If you use an intel-based mac, could you possibly try out the dmg that
> I've posted here
> and let me know if it works for you:
>
> http://www.sagemath.org/incoming/
>
Hi,
If you use an intel-based mac, could you possibly try out the dmg that
I've posted here
and let me know if it works for you:
http://www.sagemath.org/incoming/
It is supposed to be the case that when you click on the included .app, that
SAGE pops up in your web browser. You can click a
William Stein wrote:
> Michael,
William,
>
> I put an ampersand at the end of this file:
>
> /Applications/Sage-2.5.app/Contents/MacOS/Sage-2.5
>
> and now the jumping goes away.
Great.
>
> I think the best way to build the SAGE OS X app is to
> literally build it in place in that subdirecto
Michael,
I put an ampersand at the end of this file:
/Applications/Sage-2.5.app/Contents/MacOS/Sage-2.5
and now the jumping goes away.
I think the best way to build the SAGE OS X app is to
literally build it in place in that subdirectory instead
of using a pre-built binary. This makes this
Here's a patch to implement one_element. You have to do "sage -ba"
after applying it since the auto dependence checking in setup.py isn't
good enough yet (any volunteers to fix it?).
-- William
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel
> Strong +1 for this. I can't believe we don't already have it :-)
>
> Not sure I would want it called _unit_ though, makes me think rather
> of invertible elements. How about _one_, or _unity_?
+1 for disambiguation of unit vs. unity.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To po
Hi,
I really liked being able to break down a factorization using the list
method. Apparently this is not available in the current calculus
package. I would like it to be added. I do not understand how the list
method for the factorization of Polynomial_integer_dense is
implemented or how to find
On 5/24/07, David Harvey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But I don't want to dive into making a UnitaryRing subclass just to
> address this issue. We start getting problems because pyrex doesn't
> support multiple inheritance; for this reason we've been trying to
> keep the class hierarchy as simple
We're tentatively considering making having a fortran compiler
a prerequisite for building SAGE from source. See below for the
discussion, if you're interested. Basically, this will make it much
easier for SAGE to be useful to a vast range of engineers that
do numerical computation.
--
On 5/24/07, Pablo De Napoli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Another difference (in favor of Sage) is that Sage is that Sage is
> distributed as sourcecode, whereas the others are binary-only
> distributions. Usually, the binary programs sizes are much smaller
> that in source form.
>
When I put 14
On May 24, 2007, at 2:31 PM, Mike Hansen wrote:
> Would it be better to have a UnitaryRing subclass? It'd be a bit more
> work but would be a bit more natural since not all rings have a unit.
You're right. Currently in SAGE the CommutativeRing class is assumed
to have a unit (algebraic geome
Would it be better to have a UnitaryRing subclass? It'd be a bit more
work but would be a bit more natural since not all rings have a unit.
On 5/24/07, Nick Alexander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> David Harvey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On May 24, 2007, at 1:53 PM, Michel wrote:
> >
> >>
David Harvey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On May 24, 2007, at 1:53 PM, Michel wrote:
>
>>
>> My apologies if I have misunderstood things. I am doing some pyrex
>> programming and I see there are many pitfalls (like writing !=None :-)
>>
>> I encountered the following problem:
>> If I understand
On May 24, 2007, at 1:53 PM, Michel wrote:
>
> My apologies if I have misunderstood things. I am doing some pyrex
> programming and I see there are many pitfalls (like writing !=None :-)
>
> I encountered the following problem:
> If I understand correctly then rings have a _zero_element attribut
My apologies if I have misunderstood things. I am doing some pyrex
programming and I see there are many pitfalls (like writing !=None :-)
I encountered the following problem:
If I understand correctly then rings have a _zero_element attribute
but not a _unit_element
attribute. Since you often wan
This is excellent, thanks!
On 5/24/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I wrote this, along with other 3d hacks for Alex's plotting code, about 9
> months ago. It's so horrendously slow, I didn't show it off much. You can
> imagine my surprise that the resultant image is the
Another difference (in favor of Sage) is that Sage is that Sage is
distributed as sourcecode, whereas the others are binary-only
distributions. Usually, the binary programs sizes are much smaller
that in source form.
On 5/24/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Heh. To be fair, y
I wrote this, along with other 3d hacks for Alex's plotting code, about 9
months ago. It's so horrendously slow, I didn't show it off much. You can
imagine my surprise that the resultant image is the only image in Wikipedia's
SAGE article to this day.
def xproj(x,y,z,r):
return (y*r[1] -
On 5/23/07, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 5/23/07, Marshall Hampton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Surface plots are very important for my sage-teaching plans.
> > Currently the maxima surface plots don't work for a notebook running
> > on a different machine (unless there is som
Hi,
I am interested in helping but fairly ignorant. I did manage to
crudely fix some problems with R and Rpy on OS X:
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel/browse_frm/thread/9b49021a79871f48/c7f2b4f67c6acb87?lnk=gst&q=Rpy&rnum=2#c7f2b4f67c6acb87
-Marshall Hampton
On May 23, 9:57 pm, "[E
Heh. To be fair, you get Matlab with all the bells & whistles.
On Wed, 23 May 2007, William Stein wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm attempting to update some of the software that I get through
> UW's site license. Here are the download sizes (on linux):
>
> Mathematics 6.0 .. 477MB
> Maple
23 matches
Mail list logo
