I am actually interested in the internal representations and
manipulation required to do this sort of thing. I.e. how would one
duplicate the internal workings of maxima in python.
Josh
On Apr 29, 10:21 pm, Michel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The way maxima works that from the view point
> of
The way maxima works that from the view point
of the user there are very few automatic simplifications.
There are however a lot of "expression manipulation commands" like
"expand",
"ratsimp", "factor", "trigexpand" etc...
Some automatic simplifications are 12+14=26, x+x=2*x.
Internally of course
Disclaimer: I think this may have more or less been covered in the
earlier mega-discussion on symbolic computation. Also the whole reason
we use maxima is to avoid dealing with the problems I'm describing but
I still
would like to think about it a bit and am curious if anyone has any
insight.
I
David Roe شارك بـ:
> I'd be happy to do it. Having just read through the code, it looks like it
> shouldn't be hard, with the following potential hangups:
> Does SAGE have Tamagawa numbers, Kodaira symbols and minimal models for
> elliptic curves?
> I need to think a bit about the syntax for com
"David Joyner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello SAGE people:
>
> This is proposal for 4th SAGE days 2007, to be held the week of
> June 11-16, 2007 (a Monday thru Saturday) in the Mathematics Department of
> the University of Washington in scenic Seattle.
I'm interested.
Nick
--~--~
Kyle,
I didn't apply the patch you have below. For SAGE-2.5, I did,
however, make some changes to how sets and hashing of sets works so
that your examples work fine, and I included them in the docstrings.
Basically, now finite sets will have their frozenset computed when the
set is created.
--
I've fixed this bug for SAGE-2.5.
On 2/19/07, didier deshommes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Allo,
> {{{log_html}}} crashes because of undefined variable:
>
> {{{
> sage: log_html ()
> [..]
> 245 T = self._title()
> 246 inlog = os.path.split(self._input_log_name())[1]
> -
Okay, thanks. I'll give it a try.
--Mike
On 4/29/07, Robert Bradshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I think its mostly there for convenience. Try passing in the empty
> list and then overriding gens() and ngens() for starters. Perhaps
> look into the source to see what it actually ends up doing
I think its mostly there for convenience. Try passing in the empty
list and then overriding gens() and ngens() for starters. Perhaps
look into the source to see what it actually ends up doing with them...
On Apr 29, 2007, at 12:15 AM, Mike Hansen wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm trying to implement s
Hello,
I'm trying to implement symmetric functions in SAGE and would like to
define them as an algebra that fits into SAGE's framework and plays
nicely with the rest of SAGE. But, it seems that Ring and Algebra are
subclasses of ParentWithGens which requires a (finite) list of
generators. What
10 matches
Mail list logo
