[sage-devel] Re: IPython parallel update

2007-02-17 Thread Brian Granger
Joshua, Here are the notes on how we have addressed these issues: On 2/17/07, Joshua Kantor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hey Brian, > > I think all the issues I've come across are ones I've told you about. > To recap > > 1. Add capability so multiple groups of engines and remote controllers >

[sage-devel] Re: IPython parallel update

2007-02-17 Thread Joshua Kantor
Hey Brian, I think all the issues I've come across are ones I've told you about. To recap 1. Add capability so multiple groups of engines and remote controllers can operate on one machine without conflicting. 2. Keep track of the worker and controllers (PID)/clean up spawned processes graceful

[sage-devel] Anyone else try VMware Fusion (VMware for Macs)?

2007-02-17 Thread Jason Martin
Hi All, I was able to get 64-bit Ubuntu installed and running in a VMware virtual machine. Sage appears to build on it, too (that's as far as I've gotten in testing it). One problem I'm having is that I'd like to be able to login to the virtual machine remotely. However, I can't seem to get th

[sage-devel] Re: sage-2.1.3

2007-02-17 Thread William Stein
On Fri, 16 Feb 2007 17:31:03 -0800, Joel B. Mohler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > Whenever I try to clone I get the funny message like the below. I'm stumped > as to what that might mean. I got the same error with 2.1.2, but thought > that 2.1.3 would fix it :-( 2.1.0.1 was working ju

[sage-devel] Number field rings

2007-02-17 Thread Joel B. Mohler
Hi, I'm getting rather frustrated with the lack of speed for simple arithmetic in number fields. At the moment, I'm most interested in very fast cyclotomic fields. (A comparison is in the P.S. to get a feel for it). After some profiling and fiddling around a bit, it appears that the lack o

[sage-devel] Re: SAGE Status report talk

2007-02-17 Thread Robert Bradshaw
I've been meaning to do this. See http://sage.math.washington.edu: 9001/days3/sprints/3d I'll be at SAGE days Mon-Wed if anyone wants to talk to me about this (or, as always, email works fine too). On Feb 17, 2007, at 8:42 AM, David Joyner wrote: > Hi Robert: > I wonder if you would be kind e

[sage-devel] Re: SAGE Status report talk

2007-02-17 Thread Joel B. Mohler
On Saturday 17 February 2007 05:12, William Stein wrote: > Hi, > > Here are my slides for the opening talk at SAGE Days 3: > >http://sage.math.washington.edu/talks/2007-02-17-status/ Wow, wish I was there to hear it but it just didn't work out this time! I'm wishing you all a productive SAGE

[sage-devel] Re: sage-2.1.3

2007-02-17 Thread William Stein
On 2/17/07, Dan Christensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > 2.1.3 fixes the blas-related problems I had with 2.1.0.1. All tests > pass. > > This is on a Debian P4 laptop, with atlas3-sse2 installed. Cool, I hoped it would! I disabled allowing it to use FORTRAN Blas by default. (BLAS is actua

[sage-devel] Re: sage-2.1.3

2007-02-17 Thread Dan Christensen
2.1.3 fixes the blas-related problems I had with 2.1.0.1. All tests pass. This is on a Debian P4 laptop, with atlas3-sse2 installed. Dan --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send

[sage-devel] SAGE Status report talk

2007-02-17 Thread William Stein
Hi, Here are my slides for the opening talk at SAGE Days 3: http://sage.math.washington.edu/talks/2007-02-17-status/ -- William Stein Associate Professor of Mathematics University of Washington --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-d