> On 10/27/06, Robert Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'm not trying to add a matplotlib primitive, exactly. I'm defining a
> > new type of primitive, GraphicPrimitive_NetworkXGraph. The user
> > doesn't need to use this primitive, but it's an intermediate step for
> > me in constructing a g
On 10/27/06, Robert Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm not trying to add a matplotlib primitive, exactly. I'm defining anew type of primitive, GraphicPrimitive_NetworkXGraph. The userdoesn't need to use this primitive, but it's an intermediate step forme in constructing a graphics object that wi
On 10/27/06, Robert Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
There's one thing that the Graphics class needs: the way it's writtenright now, the only graphics primitives you can add are the oneslisted in the module itself. If I get to the following point,import networkx as NX
G = NX.dodecahedral_graph()N
Is there any particular reason that the cdef functions in arith.pyx
are wrapped in classes? Why not just make them globals?
David
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email t
I just had eight "lisp.run" processes running on sage.math. They were
owned by me, so I killed them. I'm not sure how they got there. The
only weird thing I was doing was running a broken version of sage
where i was accidentally not incrementing a reference count
somewhere, and I had to ki
Quoting Bill Hart :
> ...
> What worries me is the following trace:
>
> sage: R=ZZ['y'];
> sage: f=(1+y+y^2)*(2+y^2)
>
---
>Traceback (most recent call last)
> /home/wbhart/ in ()
> : name 'y' is not defined
>
I had
One other problem is that if one changes the syntax of a certain SAGE
command, every other command which calls it via this trick will then be
thrown off. Of course that is already a problem if one changes an
existing SAGE library function, so it isn't really that much of an
issue. It may even make
Feel free to ignore this one, as I already mentioned it before, but
something still worries me about it slightly and I may have a
suggestion.
What worries me is the following trace:
sage: R=ZZ['y'];
sage: f=(1+y+y^2)*(2+y^2)
---
Bill,
Thanks for getting to the bottom of this. It's about time. People
have asked about this probably 10 times before...
-- William
On Fri, 27 Oct 2006 07:57:10 -0500, Bill Hart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> William Stein wrote:
>
>> Literals are parsed by the RealNumber command, which
William Stein wrote:
> Literals are parsed by the RealNumber command, which you can set to
> whatever
> you want (as I explained a day or two ago on sage-devel).
Whoops, I see that now. I can't imagine how I managed to miss that. It
works, thanks.
By the way, I noted above that one more decima
On Oct 26, 2006, at 11:24 PM, William Stein wrote:
>
> On Thu, 26 Oct 2006 19:13:03 -0500, David Harvey
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> I know a few people had been wondering how to see inside those opaque
>> mercurial bundle files. I asked on the mercurial mailing list, and
David Joyner wrote:
> Hi Pere:
>
> There is nothing on completely regular codes in SAGE or even in GUAVA,
> so this would be great!
Thanks,
> I downloaded your tarball and tried to read it. A few comments:
>
> 1. It needs lots more documentation, explanation, and examples.
This tarball was n
On Fri, 27 Oct 2006 02:57:59 -0500, Bill Page
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> William,
>
> I have prepared an initial "alpha" version of an spkg for Axiom.
>
> You can download it (or access it directly) from here:
>
> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/page/packages/axiom4sage-0.1.spkg
>
> Inst
William,
I have prepared an initial "alpha" version of an spkg for Axiom.
You can download it (or access it directly) from here:
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/page/packages/axiom4sage-0.1.spkg
Install it using the standard command in sage-1.4.2 or later:
$ sage -i axiom4sage-0.1.spk
David Joyner wrote:
> Hi Pere:
>
> There is nothing on completely regular codes in SAGE or even in GUAVA,
> so this would be great!
Thanks,
> I downloaded your tarball and tried to read it. A few comments:
>
> 1. It needs lots more documentation, explanation, and examples.
This tarball was no
15 matches
Mail list logo
