Re: [rules-users] Drools with LDAP

2011-05-16 Thread Michael Anstis
Hi Sumeet, You can't change our schema, and as it's our "internal \ private" schema it is subject to change (although unlikely to change dramatically any-time soon). My advice would be to get a JCR Browser so you can look at and understand our schema; asking further questions here if you require.

Re: [rules-users] Drools with LDAP

2011-05-16 Thread Sumeet Karawal
Thanks Mike. It was really helpful. But how can we change the schema so that we use different reporting tools. Thanks & Regards, Sumeet Mailto: sumeet.kara...@tcs.com From:

[rules-users] Effect of KnowledgeAgent reload on currently running rules

2011-05-16 Thread Jamie Shaw
If I use the KnowledgeAgent with the 'drools.agent.newInstance' property set to 'false' to automatically reload my KnowledgeBase when resources in the changeset are updated, what happens to any existing sessions when the agent detects changes and reloads the KnowledgeBase? Do they continue to u

Re: [rules-users] unable to determine operator for symbol [before]

2011-05-16 Thread maav
Hi Vladimiro! Did you ever manage to find a solution to this problem? I'm having the exact same problem right now. The annying thing is that it worked a couple of days ago but now it doesn't and I can't find what I'm doing differently today... :S Best regards Mattias Avelin -- View this messag

Re: [rules-users] FW: typical rules application

2011-05-16 Thread Leonardo Gomes
You might want to read this article: http://herzberg.ca.sandia.gov/guidelines.shtml 2011/5/16 Abhay B. Chaware > Anyone ? > -- > > *From:* Abhay B. Chaware > *Sent:* Friday, May 13, 2011 6:17 PM > *To:* 'Rules Users List' > *Subject:* typical rules application > >

Re: [rules-users] FW: typical rules application

2011-05-16 Thread Abhay B. Chaware
Okay, I see what you are saying. Thanks W From: rules-users-boun...@lists.jboss.org [mailto:rules-users-boun...@lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Wolfgang Laun Sent: Monday, May 16, 2011 2:02 PM To: Rules Users List Subject: Re: [rules-users] FW: typical rules applica

Re: [rules-users] Drools Human Task Service Persistence

2011-05-16 Thread loumimi
thank you very much, It works know for me, I changed my conf to use BTMTransactionManagerLookup with JTA in transaction type, I have an insert in my sessioninfo table, I have also one line persisted in ProcessInstanceInfo but deleted just after Hibernate: select processins0_.InstanceId as col_0_

Re: [rules-users] [Drools Flow 5.1] persistence + spring + localTransaction

2011-05-16 Thread Greg Stasica
hi, i've put some notes on how to set it up in the below thread (have a look on the last entries) http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Can-Drools-Flow-Persistence-Work-without-JTA-td1647078.html#a2785697 but be aware of the bug http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/drools-flow-persistence-doesn-t-work-

Re: [rules-users] FW: typical rules application

2011-05-16 Thread Wolfgang Laun
Paraphrasing your 1st paragraph - how would you react to this question? "I am just trying to get a feel of size of a typical Java application. How many low-to-medium complex classes a typical Java application will have ? I understand and agree that it totally depends upon the application and busi

Re: [rules-users] Drools with LDAP

2011-05-16 Thread Michael Anstis
H... the Guvnor Administration user-guide has a section "1.2.3.1. Using your containers security and LDAP" Furthermore, Guvnor uses JackRabbit JCR for storage so any reporting tool able to integrate with this should be usable. We don't however publish a "public" schema so you'd need to pe

[rules-users] FW: typical rules application

2011-05-16 Thread Abhay B. Chaware
Anyone ? From: Abhay B. Chaware Sent: Friday, May 13, 2011 6:17 PM To: 'Rules Users List' Subject: typical rules application Hi I am just trying to get a feel of size of a typical rules application. How many low-to-medium complex rules a typical rules application

Re: [rules-users] [planner] How to initialize LocalSearchSolverScope ?

2011-05-16 Thread Geoffrey De Smet
Op 16-05-11 01:46, felipebr schreef: > Hi Geoffrey, thank you for your answer. > > My problem is implementing the solution initializer. > I didn“t set the starting solution because I am implementing the > startsolution interface. > Need I set it anyway ? Yes, a starting solution is kinda like sett