Thanks, Rick. I've asked the question on that thread as well. It seems to
suffer from the same issue: its just a claim that appears to conflict with
Matz's implication from the same post I included in my original question.
On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 9:14 AM, Rick wrote:
> Here's a link that's a li
I don't see why that's true. It would be simple enough to use a proper OO
solution, such as writing a class that has the same interface as an Array
but tracks changes, or to extend Array instances with a module that does
the same.
On Mar 14, 2014 9:10 AM, "Jan Brdo" wrote:
> That would mean monke
If you're calling count, it doesn't matter what select values you've
passed, since you're asking ActiveRecord to return an aggregate, not any
column values.
On Sun, Jun 1, 2014 at 9:19 AM, Rodrigo Lueneberg
wrote:
> Josh,
>
> If I remove the call to "select" how to specify which columns to sele
ation just to do a count.
>
> In this scenario you would need two relations, one for the selected
> columns and another only for count. I would prefer do it using raw SQL,
> don't you agree?
>
> Rod
>
> josh.jor...@gmail.com wrote in post #1148444:
> > If you'
4 matches
Mail list logo
