On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 8:20 AM, genterminl
wrote:
> Tim,
>
> Thanks. That looks like exactly what I need to get started. I'm simply not
> familiar enough yet with ruby or rails to have come up with that from
> scratch myself, but I can certainly use it and modify it to handle the
> naming conve
Tim,
Thanks. That looks like exactly what I need to get started. I'm simply not
familiar enough yet with ruby or rails to have come up with that from
scratch myself, but I can certainly use it and modify it to handle the
naming conventions in my existing schema. Now I have to go back to wo
Well you don't exactly have to do it by *hand*. It's pretty easy to write a
script to generate the command for you. Just change table_name to whatever
your model is...
table_name = "Post"
output = [ "rails g scaffold #{table_name} --skip-migration" ]
ignore_columns = [ 'id', 'created_at', 'updat
On Oct 19, 4:16 pm, genterminl
wrote:
> The whole point is I have lots of tables with lots of columns, and I don't
> want to have to do all that typing. The magic_model_generator creates all
> the model files, and it can obviously see all the columns in the database,
> I'm just surprised that n
The whole point is I have lots of tables with lots of columns, and I don't
want to have to do all that typing. The magic_model_generator creates all
the model files, and it can obviously see all the columns in the database,
I'm just surprised that nobody has extended it or created something els
I believe you can also pass a "--skip-migration" option to scaffold so it
won't generate the migration.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby
on Rails: Talk" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rubyonrails
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 5:05 PM, genterminl
wrote:
> This is a problem I am also facing - trying to set up a rails app with
> a legacy database. The minimal model file Colin suggests works fine
> for access to the database, but I would love it if the scaffold (view,
> controller, ...) files could
Oct 18, 11:40 am, Colin Law wrote:
> On 18 October 2011 16:25, prasetya utama wrote:
>
> > yes i want to generate model, but the table has been created in
> > databases. And i want generate that table :)
>
> You say that you want to generate just the model, so you do not want
> to generate the fu
Thanks colin, for your advice :) and your coment
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby
on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this
On 18 October 2011 16:25, prasetya utama wrote:
> yes i want to generate model, but the table has been created in
> databases. And i want generate that table :)
I asked last time that you don't top post, it makes it difficult to
follow the thread,
insert your reply at appropriate points in previo
yes i want to generate model, but the table has been created in
databases. And i want generate that table :)
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby
on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to
On 18 October 2011 15:59, prasetya utama wrote:
Please don't top post, it makes it difficult to follow the thread,
insert your reply at appropriate points in previous message. Thanks.
> @colin : i haven't understand, can you explain how to make it. may be
> script for generate it like if i want
@colin : i haven't understand, can you explain how to make it. may be
script for generate it like if i want generate controller (ruby
script/generate ...)
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby
on Rails: Ta
13 matches
Mail list logo
