See https://github.com/ozpos/urps2 - use case 1
On Sunday, 24 March 2013 12:20:49 UTC, jle...@socit.co.uk wrote:
>
> Hi all, I am trying to reproduce rails 3.2 behaviour with fields_for and
> nested attributes.
>
> class ControllerAction < ActiveRecord::Base
> has_many :interactions, de
Hi All,
See https://github.com/ozpos/urps2 - still struggling with use case 2.
On Monday, 18 March 2013 19:32:57 UTC, jle...@socit.co.uk wrote:
>
> Hi All,
> I have 30 years as a self employed software engineer and have been
> experimenting with rails for several years but !!
>
> I would have mad
Hi, That is what happens now in models/controller_action.rb
def initialized_interactions() # this is the key method
[].tap do |o|
Role.all.each do |r|
if p = interactions.find { |p| p.role_id == r.id }
o << p.tap { |p| p.enable ||= true }
else
Hi, Sorry I do not know. This also confused me. Try using a name
associated with your email service provider. It should not have anything
to do with where your app server is running from.
John
On Sunday, 24 March 2013 09:11:15 UTC, Tommy Pollák wrote:
>
> From a Rails application containing e
So what should be returned instead ?
On Sunday, 24 March 2013 12:20:49 UTC, jle...@socit.co.uk wrote:
>
> Hi all, I am trying to reproduce rails 3.2 behaviour with fields_for and
> nested attributes.
>
> class ControllerAction < ActiveRecord::Base
> has_many :interactions, dependent: :d
Hi Jussi, Thank you for the suggestion. Ruby 2.0.
The problem is that an array is returned whereas rails 3.2 you get an
Interaction object.
I cannot figure out how to generate hidden fields and check boxes that will
be accepted by the update.
On Monday, 18 March 2013 19:32:57 UTC, jle...@socit.
mailers/user_mailer.rb
class UserMailer < ActionMailer::Base
default from: "youremailaddress"
# Subject can be set in your I18n file at config/locales/en.yml
# with the following lookup:
#
# en.user_mailer.password_reset.subject
#
def password_reset(us
Hi all, I am trying to reproduce rails 3.2 behaviour with fields_for and
nested attributes.
class ControllerAction < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :interactions, dependent: :destroy
has_many :roles, through: :interactions
scope :controllers, lambda {|name| where("controller_n
Yes I have, for some reason the builder object is an array under rails 4.0
and I have not found a way of presenting the view for edit.
On Monday, 18 March 2013 19:32:57 UTC, jle...@socit.co.uk wrote:
>
> Hi All,
> I have 30 years as a self employed software engineer and have been
> experimentin
So I have a rails 3.2.11 Example app that exhibits some simple core use
cases and I am starting again under rails 4.0.0.beta1
**
<%= f.label r %>
<%= f.fields_for :interactions, s.initialized_interactions() do
|builder| %>
<% role = builder.object.role %>
Hi Michael,
I think the problem may be with the hardware being too new. Some lap tops
have good comparability with mainstream linux distros.
I had better success with older hardware and although they run slow under
windows (which is by design by M$) they run quite fast under linux.
For example
Thank you for the suggestion, yes of course I would have given up years ago
without RBs fantastically clear material.
However edit multiple does not work on multi-level nested attributes. Yet
edit a single multi-level nested attribute (using update_attributes) works
fine.
My main point is th
RubyMine 5.0.2 Fabulous IDE, excellent value for money, superb debugging
with code coverage and VCS integration, stack analysis, object tree view,
model diagrams, db integration and lots more.
I think the obsession with the command line just overwhelms you with
detail, a bit like looking at the
Hi All,
I have 30 years as a self employed software engineer and have been
experimenting with rails for several years but !!
I would have made considerably more progress and been able to give back to
the community if only there was a demo application that was released with
each new rails releas
14 matches
Mail list logo
