Thanks, but I'm not using Devise; I'm using Authlogic, so I get the
error,
undefined method 'confirm!'
There must be a straight-forward way to do this with Authlogic...
On Jun 16, 12:27 am, Andrew Skegg wrote:
> daze writes:
>
> > In a Cucumber step definition,
In a Cucumber step definition, I'm trying to login, but I keep getting
this error:
You must activate the Authlogic::Session::Base.controller with a
controller object before creating objects
(Authlogic::Session::Activation::NotActivatedError)
My code:
Given /^I am the logged in (.+) "(.+)"$/ do |
I like to use code like
Login
which, when clicked, would trigger a jQuery action defined in my
application.js file to toggle the display of a div somewhere (in this
case, a div that is a partial for a login form).
But click_link "Login" fails to recognize this kind of anchor tag!
Worse, would Cap
On Jun 14, 11:32 am, amritpal pathak
wrote:
> > Routing.rb file has following stuff
>
> Check::Application.routes.draw do
> get "posts/index"
> resources :posts do
> end
> root :to => "posts#click1"
> root :to => "posts#click2"
> end
>
> Thank you
"root :to =>" is used to denote the HOME P
notice that when I try webrat, has_content?
no longer works.
I'm guessing has_content? is specific to Capybara... is "should
contain" the equivalent in webrat?
Thanks again.
On Jun 13, 11:02 am, David Chelimsky wrote:
> On Jun 13, 8:36 am, daze wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
I'm going through The RSpec Book, and (specifically around page 333) I
encountered a problem. Basically, whenever I use "should
have_selector" in a nested form, it silently passes when it SHOULD
fail.
I've been copying the code exactly as from the book. Now, there is
one major difference - I'm u
On May 31, 4:02 pm, Walter Davis wrote:
> If the browser is using a typeface (font) that doesn't include the
> precise character that your page encoding and HTML require, then you
> won't see that character. The glyph you describe sounds like the
> "missing glyph" character, and that's why I
On May 31, 9:41 am, Frederick Cheung
wrote:
> > Is it a problem if some articles were already cleaned by doing a
> > search and replace, e.g. swapping all ’ for its corresponding proper
> > symbol?
>
> Depends. if you have replaced with pure ascii then it's not a problem.
> if not (ie for a give
Cheung
wrote:
> On May 29, 6:45 pm, daze wrote:> I'm wondering if
> anyone can give any insight into how I could resolve
> > the problem on this website:
>
> >http://jdrampage.com/
>
> > basically, all the ’ are supposed to be apostrophes ( ' ), and
> >
I'm wondering if anyone can give any insight into how I could resolve
the problem on this website:
http://jdrampage.com/
basically, all the ’ are supposed to be apostrophes ( ' ), and
quotes are messed up too...
Is it possible to run some command in the "rails console production"
to fix this?
u mentioned would be
good...
On Apr 20, 6:54 pm, Robert Walker wrote:
> daze wrote in post #993901:
>
> > You know the very common "Older posts"/"Show more" link at the bottom
> > of your Facebook news feed? You know, it functions as a way to show
> > mo
Oh wow thanks!
But what's the most up-to-date solution?
On Apr 20, 2:38 am, Walter Lee Davis wrote:
> On Apr 19, 2011, at 11:33 PM, daze wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > You know the very common "Older posts"/"Show more" link at the bottom
You know the very common "Older posts"/"Show more" link at the bottom
of your Facebook news feed? You know, it functions as a way to show
more posts or whatever... it generates more content and allows you to
scroll down more.
I'm kind of surprised there isn't a nice gem that creates that
function
On Dec 28, 8:52 am, Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote:
> bingo bob wrote in post #971015:
>
> > Can I chip in here as a slight aside - after Marnen (or someone else on
> > here) "tore a strip off me" after I asked about cucumber without really
> > doing the groundwork myself I went off and tried it in my
Let's say I have this set up:
an article belongs to a section
If I go to sections/show, I would see a list of articles belonging to
that section. I want to be able to modify the position of each
article within that section, so in the model for article, I'd put...
acts_as_list :scope => :section
On Dec 27, 12:37 pm, Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote:
> > I'll get back to you on how the rspec + cucumber works out. I've been
> > reading the background of cucumber and I'll get them installed/running
> > soon hopefully.
> [...]
Okay... Cucumber is not something you pick up in a day, is it? W
On Dec 26, 10:18 pm, Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote:
> > All I see, including in the Rails 3 installation instructions here...
> > https://github.com/aslakhellesoy/cucumber-rails/blob/master/README.rdoc
> > ... are instructions involving RSpec only. :/ Bleh.
>
> Bleh? What have you got against RSpe
> >> > Alright. Here's one roadblock.
> >> > So what I understand w/BDD is that I should write all these tests,
> >> > watch them fail, and then code to make the tests pass.
>
> >> No. Write *one* test, watch it fail, make it pass, refactor as
> >> necessary. Then write the next test. Lather, rinse
On Dec 25, 11:44 pm, Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote:
> daze wrote in post #970694:
>
> > Alright. Here's one roadblock.
> > So what I understand w/BDD is that I should write all these tests,
> > watch them fail, and then code to make the tests pass.
>
> No. Write
Also, what's becoming REALLY bothersome (I must not full understand or
something) is that my tests keep failing, but testing things with
rails server works fine! :(((
On Dec 25, 11:18 pm, daze wrote:
> Alright. Here's one roadblock.
> So what I understand w/BDD is that I should
tever error comes up... I
don't understand how people do this.
On Dec 25, 10:05 pm, Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote:
> daze wrote in post #970685:
> [...]
>
>
>
> > With regard to the idea about testing behavior alone:
>
> > That makes a lot of sense. A lot. My ques
kay to use Shoulda and
factory_girl_rails to handle all my testing? Or is rspec / cucumber
absolutely necessary? (I don't feel like changing but I guess I
need to know)
On Dec 24, 8:37 pm, Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote:
> daze wrote in post #970545:
>
> > I noticed this...
&
I noticed this...
http://bjhess.com/blog/2008/04/27/five-rails-tips/
But it's outdated a bit. What should I do? I get a DEPRECATION
WARNING: response.layout has been deprecated. Use template.layout
instead. but after googling around I can't find a definitive solution.
It's gotta be simple...
Oh whoa okay thanks. I better make some changes now... :/
Can I use Shoulda w/ Rspec, or do I just use one over the other?
And I should use this one https://github.com/rspec/rspec-rails, right?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby
on Rails: Talk" g
On Dec 22, 10:38 pm, Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote:
> Let's see your error messages. But why the heck are you defining an
> object like this anyway? What are you trying to achieve?
I'm trying to get a test for acts_as_list working. I've defined a
method in test_helper that I use in my unit tests:
Here's my issue: running ruby -I test test/unit/something_test.rb for
each of my unit tests works perfectly.
However, running rake test:units brings errors in all of them - some
object becomes nil for some reason.
Why might this be happening?
Specifics: the object that is successfully not nil whe
Great, thanks!
So in summary:
1) Use rspec and shoulda together, as the Thoughtbot team (which
created shoulda) is saying they are using rspec
2) To test acts_as_list, test the behavior of it (or test the
inclusion of that one module in the appropriate class)
I don't know what "that one module i
On Dec 22, 9:45 am, Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote:
> Well, that whole way of testing is wrongheaded and always was. You
> shouldn't be testing for implementation details like instance methods;
> rather, you should be testing for behavior. (Although I sometimes test
> for acts_as_list by making sure
I'm using Shoulda.
After copying the code here
http://joshuaclayton.github.com/code/2009/07/14/should-act-as-list.html
into my test_helper file so I can test acts_as_list, I came across
issues. For one I realized I had to get rid of the _ between the
"should" and "have" in past cases,
Wow, that's great - thanks for the thorough response. I guess I'll
use the
t.sequence(:title) {|n| "Article#{n}"}
style when I can, but otherwise I'll have to keep that :count
Thanks again!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby
on Rails: Talk
On Dec 20, 9:13 pm, Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote:
> Well, you didn't quote the lines you were replying to, and you didn't
> state what you were wondering...so I'm left wondering how to read your
> mind. :D
>
> In future, please just ask what you need to ask.
>
> Best,
> --
> Marnen Laibow-Koserhttp:/
You could do something like
<%= form_for :user, :url=>{ blablabla } do |f| %>
(...)
<% end %>
:-)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby
on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscri
I'm using thoughtbot's shoulda, and I have this in a model:
validates_inclusion_of :year, :in => %w[ 09-10 10-11 ]
where :year is of type string. How do I test this in shoulda? Is it
with
(1) should ensure_inclusion_of
or do I have to do
(2) should allow_value('09-10').for(:year) and the should
I'm wondering about something along these lines too...
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby
on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-
I figured it out.
I simply forgot to put "Admin::" for the articles controller in the
admin namespace. Making the controllers start with "class
Admin::ArticlesController" resolved the issue.
Of course I had to add "Admin:: to any other controllers in the admin
namespace that were missing it too.
On Dec 20, 11:01 am, "ppgeng...@prevailhs.com"
wrote:
> As a note, in the case where you just want a number in a string I
> prefer this syntax:
>
> Factory.define :article do |t|
> t.association :section
> t.sequence(:title) {|n| "Article#{n}"}
> end
>
> That way you don't have a seque
On Dec 20, 11:01 am, "ppgeng...@prevailhs.com"
wrote:
> As a note, in the case where you just want a number in a string I
> prefer this syntax:
>
> Factory.define :article do |t|
> t.association :section
> t.sequence(:title) {|n| "Article#{n}"}
> end
>
> That way you don't have a seque
I get the match syntax for rails 3 in the routes.rb file:
match 'somewhere' => 'articles#index'
This would let me use somewhere_path, which is cool.
...
But how do I define a path called 'xyz' to something like admin/
articles/index? Something like...
match 'xyz' => 'admin/articles#index'
But
Figured it out. Here's the summary:
If you have a sequence called :xyz and you are calling it in a
factory, YOU NEED TO HAVE BRACKETS around the Factory.next(:xyz)
call. In my case:
# Factories
Factory.define :article do |t|
t.association :section # 'belongs to a section'
t.title
On Dec 18, 8:20 pm, David Kahn wrote:
> You are fine... I had a problem and did not know to put my code there.
What?? If I'm fine, then why isn't the :count sequence working for
one of the factories? (read first post)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Well, in the end, I've decided to only have mysql2 for production.
For development, I have sqlite3...it's just so "rails server" can work.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby
on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t.
On Dec 18, 3:25 pm, David Kahn wrote:
> Do you have your :count sequence defined in factories/factories.rb? I have a
> similar case defined in this file and it works fine:
I have everything above defined in one file: test/factories.rb. Is
that a problem?
The doc (https://github.com/thoughtbot/f
On Dec 18, 4:51 am, Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote:
> Why are you using the same sequence in two different factories?
I just want a way to number things differently for multiple
factories. I originally had a sequence called :article_title, but
then I didn't want to make something SO similar later
wit
If you check this out - it's in my factories.rb file:
--
# Factories
Factory.define :article do |t|
t.association :section # 'belongs to a section'
t.title {|x| "#{x.section.name}Article" + Factory.next(:count) }
...
end
(...)
Factory.define :page do |t|
t.titl
On Dec 14, 10:58 pm, David Kahn wrote:
> Did you look at your ArticlesController for clues?
Um...yes. But I didn't see anything odd.
> Also, does your app function through the browser but not running the tests?
Yes, running rails server works fine. It's the tests that give this
error.
> Wou
On Dec 15, 4:02 am, Colin Law wrote:
> If you want to run a test directly like this you have to tell it to
> include the test directory so it can find the helpers, so from the
> root of your app
> ruby -I test test/unit/article_test.rb
>
> That is a capital i (for Include)
>
> Colin
Okay - I gue
I'm having trouble testing my Rails 3 application. Unit testing
doesn't work. If I try ruby article_test.rb directly, I get a "no
such file to load" error, and if I try rake test:units or ruby unit/
article_test.rb I get this odd "superclass mismatch for class
ArticlesController" error!
I'm hopi
In the end, I just made a new rails 3 application and did a lot of
code transfer (copy/paste). It actually didn't take that long, and
things are great with the app in Rails 3.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby
on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to th
Hey thanks! Just like to say that factory_girl_rails (factory_girl
for Rails 3) works excellently.
On Dec 6, 5:24 pm, Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote:
> daze wrote in post #966672:
>
> > What is the preferred way to have testing data - fixtures, or
> > something like factory_girl (
Wait com'on there must be a way to get this mysql2 database to work
quickly with rails server
And I've never come across the invalid date error you described.
Something...maybe???
On Dec 4, 5:40 pm, Alpha Blue wrote:
> I don't recommend using mysql2 gem right now. It still has many
> problem
Hey thanks! I'll try mysql instead and hope that the server will work
better...
what a pity that mysql2 isn't so stable.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby
on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-t...@googlegroups.c
What is the preferred way to have testing data - fixtures, or
something like factory_girl (https://github.com/thoughtbot/
factory_girl)?
I definitely need something that can handle relationships between
things - for example, an article belongs to a section / a section has
many articles.
Also, how
On Dec 4, 5:41 am, gezope wrote:
> Try this: gem install thin (or gem install mongrel also good),
> then write it to your Gemfile: gem 'thin',
> then from command line: 'rails server -thin'
> it will be faster then Webrick, the default server.
I'm trying this right now, but I can't install thin
On Dec 4, 12:57 am, Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote:
> It's in MySQL's data directory, the location of which is set in your
> MySQL configuration. SQLiite works fundamentally differently from most
> other DBs, in that it puts the whole DB in a single file, which is nice
> and portable, but runs into c
Oh I just opened my HeidiSQL program and found that all these
databases an be found there! All the tables and stuff can be viewed
there...how nice. Except...I still don't understand WHERE these dbs
arehow does mysql2 handle them? How come they're not found in my
application when I look throu
I've created a db. Well... running 'rails console' and testing for
the existence of users and other resources works, so I'd infer that my
db has been created. But it's not in my db directory, or in the root
directory... where could it be?
I recently tried getting mysql2 to work with my rails 3.0
> Sorry for any confusion. I was answering the two different questions
> the OP seemed to ask:
> 1) *can* you set up different DBs for dev/test/production?
> Yes you can, and it's very easy.
> 2) *should* you do it?
> No - in most cases.
I think, when you say "should you do it?" you mean "should y
Whoa whoa whoa. form_for is for the VIEW. It generates html.
Specifcally, it generates tags and etc...
On Nov 26, 2:35 pm, RobL wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I'm having an awful lot of trouble trying to use form_for inside a
> helper. Any ideas how to get this to work?
>
> module MyHelper
>
> def
Should the types of databases for development, testing, and production
all be the same?
Is it okay to have, for example, sqlite3 for development and testing,
and mysql2 for production? Is that doable/common/not too hard to
configure?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to th
well, you should probably check this out:
http://api.rubyonrails.org/classes/ActiveRecord/Timestamp.html
It says: "Active Record automatically timestamps create and update
operations if the table has fields named created_at/created_on or
updated_at/updated_on."
On Nov 26, 6:54 pm, JK wrote:
> S
Ryan Bigg.
On Nov 24, 7:50 pm, daze wrote:
> Does anyone have any insight into why this is happening?
>
> C:\Users\Family\workspace\myapp>rake test
> (in C:/Users/Family/workspace/myapp)
> C:/Program Files/Ruby187/bin/ruby.exe: illegal switch in RUBYOPT: -F
> (RuntimeErro
Does anyone have any insight into why this is happening?
C:\Users\Family\workspace\myapp>rake test
(in C:/Users/Family/workspace/myapp)
C:/Program Files/Ruby187/bin/ruby.exe: illegal switch in RUBYOPT: -F
(RuntimeError)
C:/Program Files/Ruby187/bin/ruby.exe: illegal switch in RUBYOPT: -F
(RuntimeE
I found a clean answer, and I thought I'd explain the solution.
Basically, I was too caught up in the jQuery and etc. - in this case,
Prototype works very nicely. With jQuery, I got to fumbling around
with a js.erb files. With prototype, in this, case the solution is
really clean.
http://www.rub
In Rails 2, I used this kind of code to get a certain part of the page
to update.
<% if @section.has_sidebar %>
<% for page in @section.pages %>
<%= link_to_remote "#{page.name}",
:update=>'show_page', :url
=>
{ :controller=>'page
I'm on Windowsand I can't get anything to work with this plugin:
http://github.com/rails/rails_upgrade
If I run rake rails:upgrade:check, for example, I get this:
rake aborted!
fork() function is unimplemented on this machine
What a drag! I heard that Ruby's fork() function is unimplemented
I'm on Windowsand I can't get anything to work with this plugin:
http://github.com/rails/rails_upgrade
If I run rake rails:upgrade:check, for example, I get this:
rake aborted!
fork() function is unimplemented on this machine
What a drag! I heard that Ruby's fork() function is unimplemented
I keep seeing this error when I try to upload an image:
--
2 errors prohibited this panel from being saved
There were problems with the following fields:
Image C:/Users/Family/AppData/Local/Temp/stream,10032,0.png is not
recognized by the 'identify' command.
Image C:/Users/Family/AppData/Local/Te
I cloned the repo http://github.com/dmonopoly/jdmedia with
git clone git://github.com/dmonopoly/jdmedia.git
and got the app and everything. It's an app in Rails 3, if that
matters.
Anyway, after "cd jdmedia" I find that the app doesn't work, when I'm
sure the app should.
for example, typing rails
okay, thanks...I think I might try that. (I did not have any
occurrences of named_scope anywhere in my code, just for
clarification)
I noticed though that the problem seems to stem from the
acts_as_authentic line in my User model. might that mean anything?
what exactly is that line anyway
--
I recently upgraded to Rails 3, and this error has come up
ubiquitously:
DEPRECATION WARNING: Base.named_scope has been deprecated, please use
Base.scope instead.
Any ideas on how to get rid of it? Or should I just wait for
something?
There's actually no place in my application where the code
"B
Frederick Cheung wrote:
> On Jul 12, 2:44�pm, "Daze Z." wrote:
>> Thanks, Fred.
>> But what's the advantage of not providing a method body?
>>
>
> I think it's just a way of spelling out what tests you want to write
> (and be reminded that they
Frederick Cheung wrote:
> ...One of the few differences
> I'm aware of is that Active Support's test "..." allows you not to
> provide a method body (and test runs will then tell you about that)
> and it will raise an exception if you try to create two tests with the
> same name (whereas when just
72 matches
Mail list logo
