Any chance the entire app is open source on github? I'd take a look around.
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 7:29 AM, Joaquin Rivera Padron
wrote:
> hey there,
> I have the same issue here with rails 2.3.2, have you come to some advance
> with this?
>
> thanks in advance,
> joaquin
>
>
> >
>
--~--~
hey there,
I have the same issue here with rails 2.3.2, have you come to some advance
with this?
thanks in advance,
joaquin
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby
on Rails: Core" group.
To post to this
I'm dealing with this issue as well and as far as I can tell there is
only a single redirect. Has anybody figured out the problem?
On Apr 28, 10:48 am, Amos King wrote:
> It is a single redirect. Here is the log.
>
> Processing User::MemberInfoController#index (for 127.0.0.1 at
> 2009-04-28 09:
It is a single redirect. Here is the log.
Processing User::MemberInfoController#index (for 127.0.0.1 at
2009-04-28 09:44:23) [GET]
Parameters: {"action"=>"index", "controller"=>"user/member_info"}
Member Load (12.4ms) SELECT * FROM `member` WHERE
(`member`.`username` = 'factoryusername1')
err
render(redirect_to) :action=> 'index'
sorry
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 9:22 AM, Amos King wrote:
> I'l have to find it. The team changed it to a render instead of a
> redirect(as a temp fix) I have to change it back to tell you. We
> really hacked it. I had redirect_to :index and now it is:
I'l have to find it. The team changed it to a render instead of a
redirect(as a temp fix) I have to change it back to tell you. We
really hacked it. I had redirect_to :index and now it is:
#update_code
index
render :index
#failed update code
Horrible!
I'll get on changing it back and let you
> Should flash still be persisting through redirects? Until the recent
> release, when I had:
>
> flash[:error] = "Foo"
> redirect_to login_url
>
> The flash would be populated and displayed on the login page. Now the
> flash is being cleared. Is this intentional, and if so why?
No, and this w
We are only using ssl. It worked before the last upgrade. I can't
find a double redirect.
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 7:10 AM, John Trupiano wrote:
> Are you sure there's not a double redirect? This can happen if you're using
> a plugin like ssl_requirement, where the initial redirect to login_pa
Are you sure there's not a double redirect? This can happen if you're using
a plugin like ssl_requirement, where the initial redirect to login_path goes
to port 80, then the plugin jumps in and redirects to the same url on port
443.
-John
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 7:30 AM, Amos King wrote:
>
> S