Re: [Rails-core] Making ActiveSupport::Cache consistent

2010-04-24 Thread Chad Woolley
On Saturday, April 24, 2010, Brian Durand wrote: >> This I'm not so sold on,  expires in is a memcached implementation >> specific feature and adding it to all the other cache stores simply >> seems to add overhead for very little gain.  No one is seriously going >> to be using MemoryStore or File

Re: [Rails-core] Making ActiveSupport::Cache consistent

2010-04-24 Thread Michael Koziarski
> I ended up doing a pretty large refactoring of ActiveSupport::Cache to > provide universal support for some options, fix some bugs, and update > the documentation. The patch is attached to this ticket. First, nice work. Great to see someone really roll up their sleeves. > Here are the highlig

Re: [Rails-core] Making ActiveSupport::Cache consistent

2010-04-23 Thread Ken Collins
This is a great topic and I just wanted to add that possibly a RedisStore might be good in core too. I was thinking of finding some time next week and doing a ActiveSupport::Cache::RedisStore that passes some tests and conforms to the LocalStore strategy too. I have seen this: http://github.co

[Rails-core] Making ActiveSupport::Cache consistent

2010-04-21 Thread Brian Durand
Lighthouse ticket: https://rails.lighthouseapp.com/projects/8994-ruby-on-rails/tickets/4452 I have recently been working on some gems that utilize ActiveSupport::Cache and ran into some issues with the different implementations handling the same functionality differently. One of the issues was th