Re: [Rails-core] Bump Mail dependency to pick up downstream memory improvements

Thanks guys. I've opened up a PR . Let's see what happens :) On Sunday, 24 January 2016 13:36:02 UTC, Ken Collins wrote: > > That is a great point too. I can see both sides. But looking at the memory > decrease as a "feature" seems like a winner to me

Re: [Rails-core] Bump Mail dependency to pick up downstream memory improvements

That is a great point too. I can see both sides. But looking at the memory decrease as a "feature" seems like a winner to me to at least try to go ~> 2.6 for the initial release of Rails 5.  - Ken On January 24, 2016 at 8:25:07 AM, Karl Freeman (karlfree...@gmail.com) wrote: That's a solid poi

Re: [Rails-core] Bump Mail dependency to pick up downstream memory improvements

That's a solid point. I don't really have a response other than because of the benefits above and the opportunity of doing this during a major release (e.g when people are already upgrading gems). Logically, in my head seeing a memory decrease during a major release of Rails by being progressive

Re: [Rails-core] Bump Mail dependency to pick up downstream memory improvements

It is already allowed to use mail 2.6 with rails, so why should we disallow to use mail < 2.6? On Sat, Jan 23, 2016, 21:19 Karl Freeman wrote: > Hey all, > > Without wanting to claim the hard work of others!! I would love to create > an issue that tracks bumping Mail to ~> 2.6 for Rails 5 (e.g r

[Rails-core] Bump Mail dependency to pick up downstream memory improvements

Hey all, Without wanting to claim the hard work of others!! I would love to create an issue that tracks bumping Mail to ~> 2.6 for Rails 5 (e.g re-create a PR like this one ). Here's why: Jeremyevan's PR to use a text-based columnar storage