On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 9:09 AM, mike wrote:
> Thanks for the info!
> The new engine, router and rack stuff seems like a solid base!
>
> Again.. keep up the good work! :-)
What you stumbled across is pretty much all in the lifo/docrails repository now.
Watch out for more guides, we will be doing
On Sun, Feb 7, 2010 at 3:08 AM, jnicklas wrote:
> Was going to check something in the source regarding the Rails 3 beta,
> but it's not tagged on GitHub. Would be awesome if someone could push
> the tag.
Generally release candidates are tagged, but the beta won't be. The
current state of the bet
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 6:09 PM, Jason King wrote:
> I think he means in your blog post, you have samples like this:
>
> Notifier.signup_notification.deliver
> def signup_notification(recipient)
>
> I was wondering the same thing, where is that recipient argument coming
> from?
Ahh... thanks, upd
2010/1/26 Nicolás Sanguinetti :
> Nice.
Thanks :)
> I'm not sure I understand the new API though. You define instance
> methods but call class methods? Also, what's that magic recipient
> parameter we never pass in? Why not just define class methods? Eg:
Class methods won't work unfortunately, t
Hi all,
Just letting you know we have a new DSL for Action Mailer.
class Notifier < ActionMailer::Base
delivers_from("sys...@example.com")
def signup_notification(recipient)
@account = recipient
attachments['an-image.jp'] = File.read("an-image.jpg")
attachments['terms.pdf'] = {:
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 9:48 PM, Mikel Lindsaar wrote:
> You can also look at the latest docs on railtie.rb that I just added at:
>
http://tinyurl.com/yc2545y
>
Having just re-read that again now, it needs much more work, for example it
omits to mention that you need to require th
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 1:52 AM, Mislav Marohnić
wrote:
>
> I suggest you write a post on how Railtie subclasses look like, what they
> can do and what are the options of hooking into the initializer other than
> simply appending new initialization steps to the list.
>
You can also look at the lat
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 7:33 PM, Xavier Noria wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 9:23 AM, Mikel Lindsaar
> wrote:
>
> > Our friends at Engine Yard have retained my services to go through the
> Rails
> > documentation to get the new API documented for Rails 3.0.
>
> G
ad through what I have written to add / improve / fix anything
that comes up. But it makes it a lot easier if the people doing API
changing commits update the changelog as they go.
Thanks
Mikel Lindsaar
http://lindsaar.net/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Gr
On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 1:57 PM, uncle_billy wrote:
> somehow. Before I even bother doing that, I was hoping to get some
> feedback - i.e. whether or not this will be shot down from the get-
> go.
The Oracle adapter is external to the rails code base now. I recommend you
fork the rsim github c
On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 4:48 PM, Ryan Bigg wrote:
> Oops you did, my bad. Maybe it is not including rubygems, therefore not
> looking for the i18n gem?
>
I had something like this on a pg dependancy - bad install of the pg gem.
Found the handling was to delete the gem and cache versions of pg ou
OK everyone, so we finally have Mail merged into ActionMailer replacing out
TMail
This is for the 3.0 release, and not part of the 2.x tree.
I am the TMail maintainer and I decided this year to write a ruby email
handler, the Mail gem is my solution to this.
Mail takes a very object oriented app
$ git clone git://github.com/mikel/rails.git
$ cd rails/actionmailer
$ gem install mail
$ rake
You should get 0 errors and 0 failures.
This is tested on Ruby 1.8.6, 1.8.7, 1.9.1 and 1.9.1-head (1.9.2)
Please feel free to test with your favourite ActionMailer rails app.
The major changes from us
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 11:15 PM, James H. wrote:
> Ask and ye shall receive. So, there are 10 failures on JRuby 1.4 and a
> TONNE a warnings. You can see the full output here:
> http://gist.github.com/242667
>
Thanks for the tests :)
A lot of the warnings actually come from the treetop parsers
On 25/11/2009, at 3:00, Chad Woolley wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 4:29 PM, Mikel Lindsaar
> wrote:
>> So I just updated the mail gem to 1.3.0 and against my fork of
>> actionmailer
>> at github/mikel/rails, ActionMailer now passes all tests in MRI
>
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 1:15 AM, Ken Collins wrote:
>
> KUDOS! Hell yes!
>
Heh, thanks.
So I just updated the mail gem to 1.3.0 and against my fork of actionmailer
at github/mikel/rails, ActionMailer now passes all tests in MRI 1.8.6, 1.8.7
and 1.9.1
Mikel
--
http://lindsaar.net/
Rails, RSpe
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 10:17 AM, Chad Woolley wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 5:48 AM, Mikel Lindsaar
> wrote:
> > So, I have integrated edge ActionMailer with the Mail gem, removing TMail
> in
> > the process.
> > Currently, ActionMailer is running with 1
So, I have integrated edge ActionMailer with the Mail gem, removing TMail in
the process.
Currently, ActionMailer is running with 131 tests, 309 assertions, 0
failures, 0 errors
This is using ActionMailer from http://github.com/mikel/rails as well as the
Mail gem version 1.2.8
But mail is throwi
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 9:56 AM, Yehuda Katz wrote:
> This sounds really cool. I'll take a careful look at it next week. Is there
> anything specific you could use help with?
> -- Yehuda
I think the biggest "gotcha" on any mail library is the handling of
multibyte character sets and encoding and
Hi all of both RoR Core and TMail.
You may know me better as the maintainer of TMail.
However, TMail has been a bit difficult to get working with Ruby 1.9,
so in the light of that, I sat down over the past few months and wrote
myself an all encompasing mail gem. Mail passes all of its hundreds
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 11:54 AM, Nate Wiger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Actually, we're very close to having this working -- we'd just need to
>> tweak TimeWithZone#to_s(:db) to report the time relative to the system
>> local zone if config.active_record.default_timezone == :local.
Unless I am
21 matches
Mail list logo
