On 22 Jun 2015 15:24, "pseidemann" wrote:
>
> hello,
>
> currently in rails you have two methods to save a record: `save` and
`save!`.
> I think `save` is often used wrong because the return value is not always
checked.
> even the documentation is not very clear about the subtle different about
th
On 2 December 2013 09:09, Alex wrote:
> This attack is not possible with non js content loaded by XHR or iframes,
> as the browser enforces cross-domain restrictions for both, and evil site
> will not be able to get at good site's content.
>
If the operators of EvilSite have gone to such lengths
On 28 June 2013 15:04, T.J. Schuck wrote:
> This introduces a localization issue -- not everyone has a Saturday/Sunday
> weekend! Particularly Islamic countries:
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Workweek_and_weekend#Islamic_countries but
> also Israel, Nepal, India, and others.
>
>
>
Seeing as "be
On 15 August 2012 20:23, Jason Fleetwood-Boldt wrote:
> "How many ruby developers does it does to ask if something is not false?"
>
> Although non-standard, I would argue that the most logical way to write that
> is:
>
> unless object.nil?
>
> I know it's a double-negative, but in fact if you thin
On 8 August 2012 14:33, Ken Collins wrote:
>
>> But when using UUIDs, there is no reason to ask the database for a
>> newly-inserted record's ID.
>
> There is if ActiveRecord uses it for a primary key.
But ActiveRecord will have generated it, and given it to the DB to
insert - the DB won't have
On 9 May 2012 11:29, mcasimir wrote:
> About 'this is duplicated code': what about STI?
>
> eg
> class Content < AR::Base
> class Article < Content
> class Video < Content
>
> Here Video instances will respond to :text, and Article will respond_to :url
> without batting an eye. moreover even in th
On 2 March 2012 21:18, Mark Peterson wrote:
> Again, not sure where you got the "rage" from.
>
I tend to get it from top-posting with no trimming ;-)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby
on Rails: Core" group.
To post to this group, send email to r
On 28 June 2011 01:14, Ryan Bigg wrote:
> where("LOWER(email) = ?", email) isn't good enough?
No.
It's a particular problem when using the dynamic
"find_or_create_by_email(value)" and the ilk.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby
on Rails: Core" g
On 4 February 2011 20:36, Michael Pavling wrote:
> That's my preference anyhoo...
oops! This is rails-core list... take it over to "talk"
apologies...
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby
on Rails: Core" group.
To po
On 4 February 2011 20:30, Paul wrote:
> I've always thought that validating the :parent (and not the foreign
> key) is the *more* correct thing to do ... but I don't understand why
> Rails does not reset the parent association when the parent_id is
> changed as demonstrated here,
>
> Any thoughts?
On 21 October 2010 20:26, blackbug wrote:
> (Are you running railroad on the aplication's root directory?)
Are you?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby
on Rails: Core" group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-c...@googlegroups.com.
11 matches
Mail list logo
